Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods is a research topic within Education. Science Explorer counts 61k research works in it since 1952. 16.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the implementation and development of the Merdeka Belajar (Independent Learning) curriculum, emphasizing the Kampus Merdeka (Independent Campus) concept. It explores topics such as curriculum development, character education, educational policy, 21st century skills, teacher competency, local wisdom integration, social studies learning models, and the application of neuroscience in education.
- Merdeka Belajar
- Kampus Merdeka
- Curriculum Development
- Character Education
- Educational Policy
- 21st Century Skills
- Teacher Competency
- Local Wisdom
- Social Studies Learning Model
- Neuroscience in Education
- Research works
- 61k fractional, since 1952
- In the world top 10%
- 9.7k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 16.1% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +589% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods research?
By volume, Indonesia and ?? publish the most (30k and 1k works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Indonesia 30k works
- 2 ?? 1k works
- 3 United States 232 works
- 4 Malaysia 212 works
- 5 Philippines 116 works
- 6 India 95 works
- 7 Singapore 94 works
- 8 Thailand 69 works
- 9 Sudan 60 works
- 10 Bangladesh 56 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu publishes the most Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods research, followed by State University of Padang and Indonesia University of Education.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu Indonesia 1.1k works
- 2 State University of Padang Indonesia 1k works
- 3 Indonesia University of Education Indonesia 1k works
- 4 State University of Makassar Indonesia 672 works
- 5 State University of Malang Indonesia 653 works
- 6 State University of Medan Indonesia 604 works
- 7 Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan Indonesia 598 works
- 8 Universitas PGRI Semarang Indonesia 592 works
- 9 Universitas Negeri Surabaya Indonesia 563 works
- 10 Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Indonesia 560 works
Who are the leading researchers in Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods include Agus Purwanto and Imam Gunawan.
- 1 Agus Purwanto 348 citations
- 2 Imam Gunawan 328 citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods research done?
The largest centres of Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods research in 2022–2025 are Jakarta (Indonesia), Medan (Indonesia), Bandung (Indonesia) and Yogyakarta (Indonesia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Curup, Padangsidempuan and Purworejo.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Jakarta Indonesia 2.1k works
- 2 Medan Indonesia 2k works
- 3 Bandung Indonesia 1.8k works
- 4 Yogyakarta Indonesia 1.6k works
- 5 Semarang Indonesia 1.5k works
- 6 Bengkulu Indonesia 1.5k works
- 7 Malang Indonesia 1.3k works
- 8 Makassar Indonesia 1.3k works
- 9 Padang Indonesia 1.3k works
- 10 Surabaya Indonesia 1.3k works
Where it is the local speciality
- Curup43.6 works62×
- PadangsidempuanID · 597.6 works45×
- PurworejoID · 65.1 works34×
- Purwokerto75.1 works33×
- Kelurahan TounsaruID · 238.3 works31×
- Padang94.2 works30×
- SingarajaID · 428.4 works30×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods?
Among universities, judged by research, Indonesia University of Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha and Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indonesia University of Education Indonesia | 72.0 | 21.7% | 32.4× | 1,004 | +1409.5% |
| 2 | Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Indonesia | 69.4 | 24.4% | 31.1× | 387 | +3718.5% |
| 3 | Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta Indonesia | 69.3 | 24.0% | 19.9× | 367 | +1077.1% |
| 4 | Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu Indonesia | 68.7 | 14.9% | 26.2× | 1,149 | +2326.5% |
| 5 | Yogyakarta State University Indonesia | 68.2 | 19.4% | 29.0× | 513 | +416.9% |
| 6 | State University of Padang Indonesia | 68.1 | 14.6% | 31.3× | 1,050 | +926.8% |
| 7 | State University of Malang Indonesia | 67.8 | 16.7% | 22.0× | 654 | +1983.1% |
| 8 | Universitas Negeri Surabaya Indonesia | 67.7 | 18.0% | 24.1× | 563 | +395.4% |
| 9 | State University of Semarang Indonesia | 67.0 | 17.1% | 22.3× | 528 | +383.0% |
| 10 | Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta Indonesia | 66.7 | 19.4% | 23.8× | 365 | +642.2% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 589% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2023. The fastest-growing topics are Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.