Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Researcher · Instituto Florestal · Brazil

Edgar Fernando de Luca

Edgar Fernando de Luca publishes mostly in Plant Science, Soil Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, on topics such as Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Soil Management and Crop Yield and Growth and nutrition in plants.

ORCID 0000-0003-2991-284X OpenAlex
World rank
#4,184,598
of 7,710,434 ranked researchers
Rank in Brazil
#64,784
of 253,246
Works
31
Citations
499
Citations per work
16.1
h-index
8
i10-index 6Top 63% in Plant Science
Edgar Fernando de Luca

What does Edgar Fernando de Luca research?

Edgar Fernando de Luca's work is mostly in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (45%), Environmental Science (26%).

Life Sciences: 14 works · 44.8% of their workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 14 works · 44.8% of their workPlant Science: 7 works · 23.7% of their workSoil Science: 7 works · 21.1% of their workEverything else: 9 works · 28.8% of their workPhysical Sciences: 8 works · 26.4% of their workEnvironmental Science: 8 works · 26.4% of their workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 2 works · 7.9% of their workNature and Landscape Conservation: 2 works · 7.9% of their workEcology: 2 works · 5.3% of their workWater Science and Technology: 2 works · 5.3% of their workTHEIR WORKEdgar Fernando deLuca31works
Life Sciences45%Physical Sciences26%

Their six largest subfields, inside their fields and domains; the grey slice is everything else they publish. The interactive view splits every one of their works down to single topics.

The fields and subfields, with their numbers
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1444.8%
  2. Everything else928.8%
    1. Environmental Science826.4%
  1. 1Plant Science24% of their works
  2. 2Soil Science21% of their works
  3. 3Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law8% of their works
  4. 4Nature and Landscape Conservation8% of their works
  5. 5Water Science and Technology5% of their works
  6. 6Ecology5% of their works

Research topics

Which keywords describe Edgar Fernando de Luca's research?

The keywords of their largest research topics: Soil Fertility, Climate Change Impact, Nitrogen Cycle, No-till Crop Production, Soil Carbon Sequestration, Soil Compaction, Sustainable Development and Genomics.

Size is their works in the topics tagged with each word, from their 8 largest topics. Each links to the topic it comes from most. The words come from the keyword list OpenAlex gives each topic, not from the text of the papers, so a word can appear that none of the papers uses.

All 19 words, with their numbers
  1. Soil Fertility132 topics
  2. Climate Change Impact102 topics
  3. Nitrogen Cycle71 topic
  4. No-till Crop Production71 topic
  5. Soil Carbon Sequestration71 topic
  6. Soil Compaction71 topic
  7. Sustainable Development72 topics
  8. Genomics61 topic
  9. Plant Nutrition61 topic
  10. Substrates61 topic
  11. Sugarcane61 topic
  12. Allometric Models41 topic
  13. Biomass Estimation41 topic
  14. Environmental Conservation41 topic
  15. Hydrographic Basins41 topic
  16. Environmental Education31 topic
  17. Sustainability31 topic
  18. Root Reinforcement21 topic
  19. Slope Stability21 topic

Where does Edgar Fernando de Luca work?

Edgar Fernando de Luca's main affiliation in the publication record is Instituto Florestal, Brazil.

How many publications and citations does Edgar Fernando de Luca have?

OpenAlex counts 31 works and 499 citations for Edgar Fernando de Luca, an h-index of 8, ranking #4,184,598 of 7,710,434 researchers worldwide on the quality score.

Ranked on field-normalised citation excellence (50%), output (30%) and citations (20%). Counts come from OpenAlex author records, which occasionally merge different people who share a name or split one person into several.

Papers, co-authors, who cited this work and researchers on the nearest topics have tabs of their own, above. Is this your page? Claim it with your ORCID iD, or request a correction or removal.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Edgar Fernando de Luca. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.