Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies is a research topic within Economics and Econometrics. Science Explorer counts 39k research works in it since 1950. 5.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers covers topics related to dynamic economic modeling, financial analysis, monetary policy, asset pricing, panel data models, market competition, investment contracts, and macroeconomic time series. It explores various aspects of economic evaluation, stock prices, fiscal stabilizations, and the impact of different macroeconomic variables on financial markets.
- Financial Analysis
- Monetary Policy
- Asset Pricing
- Panel Data Models
- Economic Evaluation
- Stock Prices
- Market Competition
- Investment Contracts
- Macroeconomic Time Series
- Fiscal Stabilizations
- Research works
- 39k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 2.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 5.4% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +7% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies research?
By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1.2k and 384 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 1.2k works
- 2 United Kingdom 384 works
- 3 Germany 378 works
- 4 India 263 works
- 5 China 205 works
- 6 Italy 146 works
- 7 Japan 131 works
- 8 Canada 127 works
- 9 Indonesia 114 works
- 10 France 99 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of Cambridge publishes the most Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies research, followed by Health & Medical Publishing Group and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 94 works
- 2 Health & Medical Publishing GroupSouth Africa 39 works
- 3 Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersUnited States 38 works
- 4 Sapienza University of RomeItaly 27 works
- 5 Human Growth FoundationUnited States 26 works
- 6 Weatherford CollegeUnited States 25 works
- 7 Health AffairsUnited States 24 works
- 8 PraxisEstonia 20 works
- 9 University of ViennaAustria 16 works
- 10 University of MichiganUnited States 15 works
Who are the leading researchers in Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies include David Moher, Roger Chou and Giuseppe Remuzzi.
- 1 David Moher Canada 38k citations
- 2 Roger Chou United States 14k citations
- 3 Giuseppe Remuzzi Italy 8.1k citations
- 4 G. N. Taylor Australia 7.7k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies research done?
The largest centres of Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies research in 2022–2025 are Cambridge (United Kingdom), New York (United States), London (United Kingdom) and Beijing (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Piscataway, Cape Town and Tallinn.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Cambridge United Kingdom 103 works
- 2 New York United States 102 works
- 3 London United Kingdom 80 works
- 4 Beijing China 63 works
- 5 Tokyo Japan 53 works
- 6 Berlin Germany 47 works
- 7 Washington D.C. United States 45 works
- 8 Cape Town South Africa 43 works
- 9 Rome Italy 41 works
- 10 Piscataway United States 39 works
Where it is the local speciality
- PiscatawayUS · 39.5 works161×
- Cape TownZA · 42.9 works25×
- TallinnEE · 21.1 works17×
- CambridgeGB · 103.0 works15×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies?
Among universities, judged by research, Sapienza University of Rome, University of Cambridge and University of Rochester score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sapienza University of RomeItaly | 57.6 | 2.9% | 6.0× | 27 | +302.2% |
| 2 | University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom | 56.3 | 0.0% | 21.1× | 94 | -5.8% |
| 3 | University of RochesterUnited States | 48.7 | 3.4% | 8.2× | 10 | +56.6% |
| 4 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersUnited States | 47.2 | 0.0% | 321.0× | 38 | +38.7% |
| 5 | National University of LaosLaos | 44.3 | 0.0% | 166.6× | 12 | — |
| 6 | Stanford UniversityUnited States | 43.7 | 5.6% | 2.5× | 12 | -1.4% |
| 7 | University of TorontoCanada | 42.8 | 6.1% | 1.4× | 8 | +4.0% |
| 8 | University of St AndrewsUnited Kingdom | 42.1 | 0.2% | 16.2× | 14 | +30.5% |
| 9 | Weatherford CollegeUnited States | 41.9 | 1.0% | 4.5× | 25 | +462.3% |
| 10 | Chennai Mathematical InstituteIndia | 40.4 | 0.0% | 59.5× | 14 | — |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 7% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2018. The fastest-growing topics are Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.