Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Frailty in Older Adults

Frailty in Older Adults is a research topic within Geriatrics and Gerontology. Science Explorer counts 32k research works in it since 1950. 24.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the concept of frailty in older adults, with an emphasis on geriatric care, comprehensive geriatric assessment, and its implications for various health outcomes. The papers cover topics such as the measurement of frailty, its association with aging and chronic diseases, the impact on surgical and cancer treatment outcomes, and interventions to prevent or reverse frailty in older individuals.

  • Frailty
  • Geriatric Assessment
  • Aging
  • Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
  • Elderly Patients
  • Functional Decline
  • Cancer in Older Adults
  • Inflammation
  • Mortality Risk
  • Physical Performance
Research works
32k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
7.8k
per year above
Top-10% rate
24.2%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+90%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Frailty in Older Adults research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (2.2k and 1.3k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 2.2k works
  2. 2 China 1.3k works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 809 works
  4. 4 Japan 698 works
  5. 5 Canada 417 works
  6. 6 Australia 400 works
  7. 7 Spain 392 works
  8. 8 Italy 322 works
  9. 9 Brazil 315 works
  10. 10 Germany 284 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 31.1%China: 18.5%United Kingdom: 11.2%Japan: 9.7%6 others listed: 29.5%31%largest
United States2,250 · 31.1%China1,339 · 18.5%United Kingdom809 · 11.2%Japan698 · 9.7%6 others listed2,131 · 29.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Frailty in Older Adults research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Harvard University publishes the most Frailty in Older Adults research, followed by Johns Hopkins University and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College.

Who are the leading researchers in Frailty in Older Adults?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Frailty in Older Adults include Cyrus Cooper, Hermann Brenner and Luigi Ferrucci.

  1. 1 Cyrus Cooper United Kingdom 7.2k citations
  2. 2 Hermann Brenner Germany 5.8k citations
  3. 3 Luigi Ferrucci United States 5.3k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Frailty in Older Adults research done?

The largest centres of Frailty in Older Adults research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom), Tokyo (Japan) and Seoul (South Korea). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Ōbu, Limerick and Winston-Salem.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 233 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 201 works
  3. 3 Tokyo Japan 176 works
  4. 4 Seoul South Korea 134 works
  5. 5 Singapore Singapore 131 works
  6. 6 Boston United States 128 works
  7. 7 New York United States 115 works
  8. 8 Shanghai China 104 works
  9. 9 Melbourne Australia 96 works
  10. 10 Baltimore United States 96 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ŌbuJP · 29.9 works100×
  2. LimerickIE · 20.5 works10×
  3. Winston-SalemUS · 36.8 works9.8×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Frailty in Older Adults than the world average.

See Frailty in Older Adults on the map

Where is the best place to study Frailty in Older Adults?

Among universities, judged by research, Capital Medical University, Dalhousie University and Wake Forest University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 30.01%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Capital Medical University: 33, 30.2%Dalhousie University: 27, 28.1%Wake Forest University: 27, 16.3%Karolinska Institutet: 24, 27.5%Harvard University: 41, 29.2%Sichuan University: 32, 38.4%University College London: 29, 29.8%Johns Hopkins University: 40, 24.6%Hong Kong Polytechnic University: 9, 51.6%National University Health System: 11, 24.4%Capital Medical Univ…Dalhousie UniversityKarolinska InstitutetWake Forest University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Capital Medical UniversityChina 64.830.2%5.8×33 +677.1%
2 Dalhousie UniversityCanada 62.128.1%7.5×27 +105.0%
3 Wake Forest UniversityUnited States 61.116.3%11.1×27 +131.7%
4 Karolinska InstitutetSweden 59.827.5%5.5×24 +103.0%
5 Harvard UniversityUnited States 59.529.2%3.3×41 +126.3%
6 Sichuan UniversityChina 58.738.4%1.9×32 +781.6%
7 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 58.629.8%2.1×29 +199.6%
8 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 58.524.6%3.8×40 +165.3%
9 Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong 57.451.6%1.0×9 +285.9%
10 National University Health SystemSingapore 57.324.4%17.1×11 +80.6%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Frailty in Older Adults research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 90% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Frailty in Older Adults.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.