Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Applied Mathematics

Point processes and geometric inequalities

Point processes and geometric inequalities is a research topic within Applied Mathematics. Science Explorer counts 13k research works in it since 1950. 15.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the analysis and modeling of spatial point patterns, including methods such as spatstat, design-based stereology, Lp Minkowski inequalities, and Hawkes processes. It covers topics related to convex bodies, valuations, estimation methods, and neuronal counting techniques in various scientific fields.

  • Spatstat
  • Point Processes
  • Stereology
  • Minkowski Inequalities
  • Hawkes Processes
  • Convex Bodies
  • Valuations
  • Estimation Methods
  • Neuronal Counting
  • Statistical Analysis
Research works
13k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
15.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-7%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Point processes and geometric inequalities research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (291 and 254 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 291 works
  2. 2 China 254 works
  3. 3 France 137 works
  4. 4 Germany 127 works
  5. 5 Italy 74 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 65 works
  7. 7 Japan 57 works
  8. 8 Russia 56 works
  9. 9 India 56 works
  10. 10 Spain 54 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 24.9%China: 21.7%France: 11.7%Germany: 10.8%6 others listed: 30.9%25%largest
United States291 · 24.9%China254 · 21.7%France137 · 11.7%Germany127 · 10.8%6 others listed362 · 30.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Point processes and geometric inequalities research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique publishes the most Point processes and geometric inequalities research, followed by TU Wien and University of Freiburg.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFrance 16 works
  2. 2 TU WienAustria 13 works
  3. 3 University of FreiburgGermany 12 works
  4. 4 Aarhus UniversityDenmark 10 works
  5. 5 Ruhr University BochumGermany 10 works
  6. 6 Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGermany 9 works
  7. 7 China Three Gorges UniversityChina 9 works
  8. 8 Alfréd Rényi Institute of MathematicsHungary 8 works
  9. 9 University of Science and Technology of ChinaChina 8 works
  10. 10 University of WarwickUnited Kingdom 8 works

Who are the leading researchers in Point processes and geometric inequalities?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Point processes and geometric inequalities include Terence Tao and Joel A. Tropp.

  1. 1 Terence Tao United States 3.1k citations
  2. 2 Joel A. Tropp United States 2.8k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Point processes and geometric inequalities research done?

The largest centres of Point processes and geometric inequalities research in 2022–2025 are Paris (France), Beijing (China), Moscow (Russia) and Shanghai (China).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Paris France 48 works
  2. 2 Beijing China 45 works
  3. 3 Moscow Russia 32 works
  4. 4 Shanghai China 25 works
  5. 5 New York United States 22 works
  6. 6 Tokyo Japan 21 works
  7. 7 Budapest Hungary 20 works
  8. 8 Vienna Austria 20 works
  9. 9 London United Kingdom 16 works
  10. 10 Hangzhou China 15 works
See Point processes and geometric inequalities on the map

Where is the best place to study Point processes and geometric inequalities?

Among universities, judged by research, TU Wien, Ruhr University Bochum and University of Freiburg score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 19.2833%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →TU Wien: 13, 45.1%Ruhr University Bochum: 10, 20.1%University of Freiburg: 12, 17.8%Aarhus University: 10, 22.8%Karlsruhe Institute of Technology: 9, 9.9%China Three Gorges University: 9, 0.0%TU WienAarhus UniversityRuhr University BochumUniversity of Freiburg
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 TU WienAustria 80.645.1%26.2×13 -14.2%
2 Ruhr University BochumGermany 63.220.1%15.9×10 +74.0%
3 University of FreiburgGermany 52.117.8%20.2×12 -48.5%
4 Aarhus UniversityDenmark 51.922.8%8.9×10 -23.7%
5 Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGermany 48.99.9%10.5×9 +33.5%
6 China Three Gorges UniversityChina 42.20.0%25.6×9 +75.4%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Point processes and geometric inequalities research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 7% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Point processes and geometric inequalities.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.