Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Religious Tourism and Spaces

Religious Tourism and Spaces is a research topic within Geography, Planning and Development. Science Explorer counts 19k research works in it since 1950. 18.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the changing geographies of religion in modernity, focusing on topics such as religious tourism, pilgrimage, sacred spaces, secularism, spiritual tourism, postsecular geographies, cultural geography, religious identity, tourist motivations, and spatial theory.

  • Religious Tourism
  • Pilgrimage
  • Sacred Spaces
  • Secularism
  • Spiritual Tourism
  • Postsecular Geographies
  • Cultural Geography
  • Religious Identity
  • Tourist Motivations
  • Spatial Theory
Research works
19k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
3.5k
per year above
Top-10% rate
18.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+33%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Religious Tourism and Spaces research?

By volume, the United States and Indonesia publish the most (506 and 375 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 506 works
  2. 2 Indonesia 375 works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 300 works
  4. 4 India 210 works
  5. 5 Spain 186 works
  6. 6 France 157 works
  7. 7 China 154 works
  8. 8 Brazil 134 works
  9. 9 Italy 114 works
  10. 10 Germany 111 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 22.5%Indonesia: 16.7%United Kingdom: 13.3%India: 9.4%6 others listed: 38.1%23%largest
United States506 · 22.5%Indonesia375 · 16.7%United Kingdom300 · 13.3%India210 · 9.4%6 others listed858 · 38.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Religious Tourism and Spaces research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universiti Teknologi MARA publishes the most Religious Tourism and Spaces research, followed by Film Independent and Jagiellonian University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Universiti Teknologi MARAMalaysia 14 works
  2. 2 Film IndependentUnited States 14 works
  3. 3 Jagiellonian UniversityPoland 13 works
  4. 4 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 13 works
  5. 5 Institut Agama Islam Negeri BengkuluIndonesia 13 works
  6. 6 Universidade de Santiago de CompostelaSpain 12 works
  7. 7 Universidad Complutense de MadridSpain 12 works
  8. 8 University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 11 works
  9. 9 University of TorontoCanada 11 works
  10. 10 Aarhus UniversityDenmark 11 works

Who are the leading researchers in Religious Tourism and Spaces?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Religious Tourism and Spaces include C. Michael Hall, Heesup Han and David Harvey.

  1. 1 C. Michael Hall New Zealand 2.2k citations
  2. 2 Heesup Han South Korea 2.1k citations
  3. 3 David Harvey United Kingdom 2k citations
  4. 4 Brian C. Wilson Canada 1.6k citations
  5. 5 Erik Cohen Israel 1.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Religious Tourism and Spaces research done?

The largest centres of Religious Tourism and Spaces research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Paris (France), Madrid (Spain) and Jakarta (Indonesia).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 53 works
  2. 2 Paris France 50 works
  3. 3 Madrid Spain 47 works
  4. 4 Jakarta Indonesia 44 works
  5. 5 Lisbon Portugal 41 works
  6. 6 Bandung Indonesia 40 works
  7. 7 Moscow Russia 31 works
  8. 8 Budapest Hungary 29 works
  9. 9 Krakow Poland 27 works
  10. 10 Yogyakarta Indonesia 27 works
See Religious Tourism and Spaces on the map

Where is the best place to study Religious Tourism and Spaces?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Universiti Teknologi MARA and Jagiellonian University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 20.42%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: 12, 21.2%Universiti Teknologi MARA: 14, 25.9%Jagiellonian University: 14, 23.0%Babeș-Bolyai University: 10, 21.7%Universidad Complutense de Madrid: 12, 18.9%Arizona State University: 9, 36.9%University of Oxford: 13, 21.9%Trunojoyo University: 10, 12.1%University of Edinburgh: 11, 13.1%Durham University: 8, 9.5%Universiti Teknologi…Jagiellonian Univers…Babeș-Bolyai Univers…Universidade de Sant…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidade de Santiago de CompostelaSpain 69.421.2%10.8×12 +44.6%
2 Universiti Teknologi MARAMalaysia 68.125.9%4.7×14 +100.7%
3 Jagiellonian UniversityPoland 63.523.0%5.2×14 +90.7%
4 Babeș-Bolyai UniversityRomania 55.021.7%10.8×10 -10.1%
5 Universidad Complutense de MadridSpain 49.818.9%4.1×12 +68.2%
6 Arizona State UniversityUnited States 46.236.9%3.4×9 -2.9%
7 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 46.021.9%2.7×13 -35.7%
8 Trunojoyo UniversityIndonesia 44.512.1%9.7×10
9 University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 41.813.1%4.0×11 +29.6%
10 Durham UniversityUnited Kingdom 36.79.5%6.0×8 +75.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Religious Tourism and Spaces research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 33% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Religious Tourism and Spaces.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.