Beijing Normal University vs Qingdao University
On research quality in 2022–now, Beijing Normal University ranks #82 in the world and Qingdao University #84, of 28,054 institutions. Beijing Normal University stands higher in 6 of the 15 fields both publish in, Qingdao University in 9.
Research profiles alike: -0.11different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Beijing Normal University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #82
- #372 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 14k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 28.3%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 30%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology.
Qingdao University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #84
- #513 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 11k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 27.9%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 35%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Polymers and Plastics, Biomaterials, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials.
Who leads in each field?
Beijing Normal University stands higher in 6 of 15 fields, Qingdao University in 9. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #57Agricultural and Biological Sciences—
- —Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#168
- —Business, Management and Accounting#167
- #80Chemistry#45
- #128Computer Science#286
- #13Earth and Planetary Sciences—
- #70Economics, Econometrics and Finance#9
- —Energy#25
- #217Engineering#85
- #5Environmental Science#249
- #60Materials Science#41
- —Medicine#210
- —Neuroscience#106
- #30Psychology—
- #55Social Sciences#866
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Social Sciences1.1× 0.2×
- Psychology2.8× 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences2.5× 0.4×
- Arts and Humanities0.7× 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy2.4× 0.5×
- Mathematics2.8× 0.6×
- Environmental Science3.3× 0.8×
- Decision Sciences1.1× 0.5×
- Computer Science1.2× 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.6× 0.3×
- Health Professions0.4× 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.4× 1.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.8× 0.6×
- Neuroscience1.8× 1.4×
- Chemistry1.4× 1.8×
- Energy1.3× 2.8×
- Engineering0.6× 1.4×
- Materials Science1.1× 3.1×
- Veterinary0.1× 0.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.3× 1.0×
- Chemical Engineering0.7× 2.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.5× 1.9×
- Nursing0.3× 1.2×
- Medicine0.2× 1.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.2× 1.7×
- Dentistry0.1× 1.2×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Beijing Normal University leans further are at the top, Qingdao University’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Beijing Normal University or Qingdao University?
Beijing Normal University publishes 1.3× as much research as Qingdao University in 2022–now (14k against 11k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Beijing Normal University or Qingdao University?
28.3% of Beijing Normal University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 27.9% for Qingdao University.