Chinese University of Hong Kong vs Washington University in St. Louis
On research quality in 2022–now, Chinese University of Hong Kong ranks #66 in the world and Washington University in St. Louis #69, of 28,054 institutions. Chinese University of Hong Kong stands higher in 6 of the 12 fields both publish in, Washington University in St. Louis in 6.
Research profiles alike: 0.59similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Chinese University of Hong Kong
- World rank, 2022–now
- #66
- #220 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 14k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 29.1%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 32%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Geophysics.
Washington University in St. Louis
- World rank, 2022–now
- #69
- #41 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 14k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 20.9%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 41%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Transplantation, General Decision Sciences.
Who leads in each field?
Chinese University of Hong Kong stands higher in 6 of 12 fields, Washington University in St. Louis in 6. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #29Arts and Humanities—
- #101Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#27
- #13Computer Science—
- —Decision Sciences#34
- #90Engineering—
- #194Environmental Science—
- —Health Professions#111
- —Immunology and Microbiology#9
- #61Medicine#19
- —Neuroscience#6
- #15Psychology#28
- #27Social Sciences#250
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Computer Science1.5× 0.4×
- Dentistry0.6× 0.2×
- Engineering0.8× 0.3×
- Materials Science0.6× 0.3×
- Energy0.6× 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.8× 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.2× 0.7×
- Social Sciences1.0× 0.6×
- Decision Sciences1.1× 0.7×
- Environmental Science0.7× 0.5×
- Mathematics1.3× 0.9×
- Arts and Humanities0.8× 0.6×
- Chemical Engineering0.6× 0.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.8× 0.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.2× 0.9×
- Psychology1.9× 1.5×
- Chemistry0.6× 0.5×
- Nursing0.8× 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.2× 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy1.1× 1.0×
- Health Professions0.8× 1.2×
- Medicine1.2× 2.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.1× 2.2×
- Neuroscience1.3× 3.0×
- Veterinary0.2× 0.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology1.0× 2.9×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Chinese University of Hong Kong leans further are at the top, Washington University in St. Louis’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Chinese University of Hong Kong or Washington University in St. Louis?
Washington University in St. Louis publishes 1.0× as much research as Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2022–now (14k against 14k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Chinese University of Hong Kong or Washington University in St. Louis?
29.1% of Chinese University of Hong Kong's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 20.9% for Washington University in St. Louis.