Chongqing University vs University of Washington
On research quality in 2022–now, University of Washington ranks #48 in the world and Chongqing University #50, of 28,054 institutions. Chongqing University stands higher in 7 of the 16 fields both publish in, University of Washington in 9.
Research profiles alike: -0.24different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Chongqing University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #50
- #321 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 22k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 25.6%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 24%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Mechanics of Materials, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering.
University of Washington
- World rank, 2022–now
- #48
- #13 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 21k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 22.8%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 34%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Aging, Oceanography, Virology.
Who leads in each field?
Chongqing University stands higher in 7 of 16 fields, University of Washington in 9. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #134Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#24
- #97Business, Management and Accounting—
- #63Chemistry—
- #80Computer Science#53
- #24Economics, Econometrics and Finance—
- #27Energy—
- #14Engineering#229
- #16Environmental Science#65
- —Health Professions#23
- #26Materials Science—
- —Mathematics#49
- —Medicine#30
- —Neuroscience#37
- —Physics and Astronomy#33
- —Psychology#68
- —Social Sciences#17
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Energy2.7× 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering2.6× 0.3×
- Engineering3.2× 0.5×
- Materials Science2.6× 0.5×
- Chemistry1.3× 0.7×
- Computer Science1.1× 0.9×
- Environmental Science1.2× 1.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.5× 0.4×
- Decision Sciences0.9× 1.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.2× 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.7× 0.8×
- Physics and Astronomy1.2× 1.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.4× 0.8×
- Mathematics0.6× 1.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.7× 1.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.6× 1.5×
- Neuroscience0.5× 1.9×
- Social Sciences0.2× 0.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.4× 1.7×
- Nursing0.2× 0.9×
- Medicine0.2× 1.6×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.6×
- Psychology0.2× 1.6×
- Dentistry0.1× 1.2×
- Health Professions0.2× 1.6×
- Veterinary0.1× 0.6×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Chongqing University leans further are at the top, University of Washington’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Chongqing University or University of Washington?
Chongqing University publishes 1.1× as much research as University of Washington in 2022–now (22k against 21k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Chongqing University or University of Washington?
25.6% of Chongqing University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 22.8% for University of Washington.