Cranfield University vs Harbin Engineering University
On research quality in 2022-now, Harbin Engineering University ranks #774 in the world and Cranfield University #775, of 22,385 institutions. Cranfield University stands higher in 4 of the 14 fields both publish in, Harbin Engineering University in 10.
Compare other institutions
Cranfield University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #775
- #1,113 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 3k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 14.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 38%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Aerospace Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Chemical Health and Safety.
Harbin Engineering University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #774
- #965 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 12k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 11.9%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 22%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Ocean Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Cranfield University leads on 5 of 8 measures: citation excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access and international co-authorship. Harbin Engineering University leads on 3 of 8 measures: research quality, output and growth.
- #775Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#774
- 1.39×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.06×
- 3kOutputfractional works, 2022-now12k
- 14.4%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited11.9%
- 30.9Citations per workall time, per fractional work10.1
- 38%Open accessof its works free to read, all time22%
- 22%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time8%
- +5%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+45%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Cranfield University stands higher in 4 of 14 fields, Harbin Engineering University in 10. Harbin Engineering University leads most in Materials Science (#286 against #728); Cranfield University leads most in Business, Management and Accounting (#486 against #1,259). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #673Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
- -Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#1,283
- #486Business, Management and Accounting#1,259
- #829Computer Science#430
- -Decision Sciences#422
- -Earth and Planetary Sciences#616
- -Economics, Econometrics and Finance#972
- -Energy#373
- #377Engineering#184
- #596Environmental Science#1,024
- #728Materials Science#286
- -Medicine#2,713
- -Physics and Astronomy#729
- #2,876Social Sciences-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Cranfield University rank | Harbin Engineering University rank | Cranfield University top 10% | Harbin Engineering University top 10% | Cranfield University works | Harbin Engineering University works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #673 | - | 16.7% | - | 109 | - |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | - | #1,283 | - | 14.9% | - | 71 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #486 | #1,259 | 17.4% | 19.2% | 183 | 122 |
| Computer Science | #829 | #430 | 13.6% | 10.7% | 236 | 1.7k |
| Decision Sciences | - | #422 | - | 11.1% | - | 119 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | - | #616 | - | 11.2% | - | 372 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | - | #972 | - | 16.2% | - | 95 |
| Energy | - | #373 | - | 9.8% | - | 112 |
| Engineering | #377 | #184 | 13.1% | 12.2% | 1.3k | 6k |
| Environmental Science | #596 | #1,024 | 13.5% | 11.3% | 270 | 340 |
| Materials Science | #728 | #286 | 12.8% | 12.6% | 89 | 784 |
| Medicine | - | #2,713 | - | 12.6% | - | 129 |
| Physics and Astronomy | - | #729 | - | 9.4% | - | 267 |
| Social Sciences | #2,876 | - | 18.4% | - | 103 | - |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.9× 0.1×
- Veterinary0.3× 0.0×
- Nursing0.4× 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting2.0× 0.4×
- Health Professions0.5× 0.1×
- Psychology0.6× 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities0.3× 0.1×
- Social Sciences0.3× 0.1×
- Environmental Science2.0× 0.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.1× 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.3× 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.8× 0.4×
- Decision Sciences2.1× 1.1×
- Neuroscience0.3× 0.2×
- Medicine0.1× 0.1×
- Energy2.0× 1.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.1× 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering3.1× 3.2×
- Engineering3.0× 3.7×
- Dentistry0.0× 0.1×
- Chemistry0.4× 0.6×
- Physics and Astronomy0.6× 1.1×
- Computer Science1.1× 2.1×
- Materials Science0.9× 2.1×
- Mathematics0.3× 0.8×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.8× 2.2×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Cranfield University leans further are at the top, Harbin Engineering University's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Cranfield University
- Product Design
- High-Order Schemes
- Material Characterization
- Turbulent Flow
- Aerodynamics
- Parameter Estimation
- Air Traffic Management
- Aircraft Design
- Electric Propulsion
- Aviation
- Multi-Agent Systems
- Microstructure
- Air Quality
- Large-Eddy Simulation
- Supply Chain Management
- Neural Networks
- Heat Transfer
- Environmental Impact
- Climate Change
- Deep Learning
- Sustainability
- Machine Learning
- Renewable Energy
- Mechanical Properties
- Collision Avoidance
- Autonomous Vehicles
- Emissions
- Risk Assessment
- Additive Manufacturing
- Alternative Fuels
- Environmental Management
- Circular Economy
- Numerical Simulation
- Renewable Jet Fuel
- Conflict Resolution
- Flight Control
- Sensor Fusion
- Path Planning
- Adaptive Mesh Refinement
- Optimal Control
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability180▲ 2.5×59 topics
- Deep Learning174▲ 1.68×69 topics
- Machine Learning148▲ 1.48×65 topics
- Climate Change144▲ 1.76×78 topics
- Renewable Energy119▲ 2.8×40 topics
- Environmental Impact103▲ 2.0×51 topics
- Mechanical Properties95▲ 3.2×32 topics
- Heat Transfer92▲ 6.3×16 topics
- Collision Avoidance90▲ 16×4 topics
- Neural Networks86▲ 1.86×32 topics
- Autonomous Vehicles83▲ 13×4 topics
- Supply Chain Management74▲ 2.8×20 topics
- Emissions72▲ 12×6 topics
- Large-Eddy Simulation72▲ 13×5 topics
- Risk Assessment67▲ 3.4×20 topics
- Air Quality62▲ 11×6 topics
- Additive Manufacturing59▲ 6.4×7 topics
- Microstructure56▲ 3.6×17 topics
- Alternative Fuels48▲ 41×2 topics
- Multi-Agent Systems47▲ 8.3×5 topics
- Environmental Management47▲ 3.8×12 topics
- Aviation45▲ 61×2 topics
- Circular Economy45▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Electric Propulsion44▲ 40×2 topics
- Numerical Simulation44▲ 5.0×11 topics
- Aircraft Design43▲ 94×1 topic
- Renewable Jet Fuel43▲ 94×1 topic
- Air Traffic Management39▲ 64×1 topic
- Conflict Resolution39▲ 32×1 topic
- Parameter Estimation38▲ 10×6 topics
- Flight Control37▲ 42×2 topics
- Aerodynamics36▲ 17×3 topics
- Sensor Fusion36▲ 11×3 topics
- Turbulent Flow35▲ 10.0×4 topics
- Path Planning35▲ 9.3×3 topics
- Material Characterization35▲ 9.9×3 topics
- Adaptive Mesh Refinement33▲ 18×2 topics
- High-Order Schemes33▲ 18×2 topics
- Optimal Control32▲ 14×4 topics
- Product Design32▲ 7.8×3 topics
Harbin Engineering University
- Stability Analysis
- Maritime Transportation
- Seafloor Mapping
- Marine Sediments
- Disturbance Observer
- Emissions
- Robotics
- Nonlinear Dynamics
- Robotic Manipulators
- Sensor Networks
- Vibration Analysis
- Adaptive Control
- Path Planning
- Microstructure
- Convolutional Neural Networks
- Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks
- Remote Sensing
- Heat Transfer
- Wireless Sensor Networks
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Neural Networks
- Mechanical Properties
- Numerical Simulation
- Acoustic Communications
- Fluid-Structure Interaction
- Nonlinear Systems
- Multi-Agent Systems
- Collision Avoidance
- Neural Network
- Feedback Control
- Sliding Mode Control
- Turbulent Flow
- Large-Eddy Simulation
- Sparse Representation
- Aerial Vehicles
- Finite-Time Stability
- Acoustic Techniques
- Wireless Communications
- Sensor Fusion
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Deep Learning1,204▲ 2.9×85 topics
- Machine Learning673▲ 1.67×89 topics
- Neural Networks620▲ 3.3×38 topics
- Wireless Sensor Networks504▲ 9.3×22 topics
- Mechanical Properties448▲ 3.8×38 topics
- Heat Transfer391▲ 6.6×20 topics
- Numerical Simulation376▲ 11×14 topics
- Remote Sensing342▲ 2.3×32 topics
- Acoustic Communications291▲ 56×1 topic
- Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks291▲ 56×1 topic
- Fluid-Structure Interaction277▲ 15×6 topics
- Convolutional Neural Networks270▲ 3.1×14 topics
- Nonlinear Systems268▲ 10×8 topics
- Microstructure264▲ 4.2×18 topics
- Multi-Agent Systems254▲ 11×6 topics
- Path Planning253▲ 17×3 topics
- Collision Avoidance244▲ 11×4 topics
- Adaptive Control230▲ 14×7 topics
- Neural Network225▲ 10×9 topics
- Vibration Analysis220▲ 6.8×9 topics
- Feedback Control217▲ 11×8 topics
- Sensor Networks210▲ 7.2×6 topics
- Sliding Mode Control197▲ 24×2 topics
- Robotic Manipulators191▲ 16×3 topics
- Turbulent Flow176▲ 12×4 topics
- Nonlinear Dynamics175▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Large-Eddy Simulation173▲ 7.6×5 topics
- Robotics172▲ 5.8×10 topics
- Sparse Representation171▲ 7.5×6 topics
- Emissions167▲ 7.0×6 topics
- Aerial Vehicles166▲ 27×2 topics
- Disturbance Observer166▲ 28×1 topic
- Finite-Time Stability166▲ 28×1 topic
- Marine Sediments166▲ 21×2 topics
- Acoustic Techniques165▲ 44×1 topic
- Seafloor Mapping165▲ 44×1 topic
- Wireless Communications163▲ 7.7×5 topics
- Maritime Transportation162▲ 24×2 topics
- Sensor Fusion157▲ 12×3 topics
- Stability Analysis154▲ 8.1×5 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Harbin Engineering University has out-published Cranfield University every year since 2005, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Cranfield University or Harbin Engineering University?
Harbin Engineering University publishes 4.0× as much research as Cranfield University in 2022-now (12k against 3k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Cranfield University or Harbin Engineering University?
14.4% of Cranfield University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 11.9% for Harbin Engineering University.
Is Cranfield University or Harbin Engineering University growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +45% against 2018-21 for Harbin Engineering University, and +5% for Cranfield University.
Which has more open access research, Cranfield University or Harbin Engineering University?
38% of Cranfield University's research is free to read, against 22% of Harbin Engineering University's.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Cranfield University
- 1 Vasilije M. Manovic #63,215 worldwide 13k citations · 205 works
- 2 Sandeep Jagtap #69,813 worldwide 4.2k citations · 143 works
- 3 Mahmood Shafiee #73,034 worldwide 4.3k citations · 120 works
- 4 Bruce Jefferson #73,711 worldwide 24k citations · 336 works
- 5 Zhugen Yang #78,952 worldwide 6.8k citations · 180 works
Harbin Engineering University
- 1 Piaoping Yang #4,610 worldwide 44k citations · 567 works
- 2 Zhuangjun Fan #5,431 worldwide 39k citations · 267 works
- 3 Yujin Chen #7,214 worldwide 29k citations · 398 works
- 4 Shili Gai #7,988 worldwide 25k citations · 292 works
- 5 Chunling Zhu #10,829 worldwide 17k citations · 225 works