Saveetha University vs Shanghai University
On research quality in 2022–now, Shanghai University ranks #86 in the world and Saveetha University #88, of 28,054 institutions. Saveetha University stands higher in 9 of the 17 fields both publish in, Shanghai University in 8.
Research profiles alike: 0.04different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Saveetha University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #88
- #691 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 16.6%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 45%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Periodontics, General Dentistry, Dentistry.
Shanghai University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #86
- #360 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 15k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 20.8%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 24%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Computational Mathematics, Metals and Alloys, Acoustics and Ultrasonics.
Who leads in each field?
Saveetha University stands higher in 9 of 17 fields, Shanghai University in 8. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #151Agricultural and Biological Sciences—
- #267Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#254
- —Business, Management and Accounting#75
- #88Chemistry#94
- #79Computer Science#191
- #4Dentistry—
- —Economics, Econometrics and Finance#71
- —Energy#64
- #57Engineering#51
- #73Environmental Science#253
- #6Health Professions—
- #39Materials Science#53
- —Mathematics#5
- #129Medicine#1,013
- #1Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics—
- —Physics and Astronomy#136
- —Social Sciences#462
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Dentistry13.6× 0.1×
- Health Professions1.1× 0.2×
- Veterinary0.4× 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.8× 0.2×
- Medicine0.9× 0.2×
- Nursing0.9× 0.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.2× 0.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.7× 0.3×
- Neuroscience1.3× 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.0× 0.6×
- Psychology0.5× 0.3×
- Computer Science2.2× 1.6×
- Environmental Science0.8× 0.7×
- Energy1.8× 1.9×
- Chemistry1.2× 1.4×
- Decision Sciences1.0× 1.4×
- Materials Science2.0× 2.9×
- Engineering1.4× 2.6×
- Chemical Engineering1.1× 2.2×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.2×
- Social Sciences0.1× 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.2× 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.4× 1.2×
- Mathematics0.5× 1.9×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.2× 1.1×
- Physics and Astronomy0.2× 1.9×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Saveetha University leans further are at the top, Shanghai University’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Saveetha University or Shanghai University?
Saveetha University publishes 1.3× as much research as Shanghai University in 2022–now (20k against 15k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Saveetha University or Shanghai University?
20.8% of Shanghai University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 16.6% for Saveetha University.