South China University of Technology vs University of Washington
On research quality in 2022–now, South China University of Technology ranks #46 in the world and University of Washington #48, of 28,054 institutions. South China University of Technology stands higher in 5 of the 15 fields both publish in, University of Washington in 10.
Research profiles alike: -0.33different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
South China University of Technology
- World rank, 2022–now
- #46
- #207 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 22k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 24.6%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 21%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Polymers and Plastics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Process Chemistry and Technology.
University of Washington
- World rank, 2022–now
- #48
- #13 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 21k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 22.8%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 34%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Aging, Oceanography, Virology.
Who leads in each field?
South China University of Technology stands higher in 5 of 15 fields, University of Washington in 10. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #131Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#24
- #99Business, Management and Accounting—
- #29Chemistry—
- #57Computer Science#53
- #44Energy—
- #18Engineering#229
- #98Environmental Science#65
- —Health Professions#23
- #15Materials Science—
- —Mathematics#49
- #363Medicine#30
- —Neuroscience#37
- #73Physics and Astronomy#33
- —Psychology#68
- —Social Sciences#17
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Energy2.7× 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering2.6× 0.3×
- Materials Science3.4× 0.5×
- Engineering2.7× 0.5×
- Chemistry2.1× 0.7×
- Computer Science1.5× 0.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.5× 0.3×
- Nursing1.2× 0.9×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.5× 0.4×
- Environmental Science0.9× 1.0×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.7× 0.8×
- Physics and Astronomy1.1× 1.6×
- Decision Sciences0.7× 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.5× 0.8×
- Mathematics0.7× 1.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.7× 1.5×
- Neuroscience0.7× 1.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.5× 1.7×
- Social Sciences0.2× 0.7×
- Dentistry0.3× 1.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.4× 1.7×
- Veterinary0.1× 0.6×
- Psychology0.3× 1.6×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.6×
- Medicine0.2× 1.6×
- Health Professions0.2× 1.6×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where South China University of Technology leans further are at the top, University of Washington’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, South China University of Technology or University of Washington?
South China University of Technology publishes 1.1× as much research as University of Washington in 2022–now (22k against 21k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, South China University of Technology or University of Washington?
24.6% of South China University of Technology's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 22.8% for University of Washington.