Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Santa Fe · United States

Archaeological Conservancy

Research works
70
▲ 160% vs 2018-21
Citations
110
1.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
90%
world 40%
International
2%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Archaeological Conservancy is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Archaeological Conservancy work in?

In 2022-now, 51% of research at Archaeological Conservancy is in Social Sciences, 48% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Earth and Planetary Sciences (38%), Social Sciences (35%), Arts and Humanities (17%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 18 fractional works · 51.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 34.8% of its workAnthropology: 9 fractional works · 25.2% of its workArcheology: 2 fractional works · 5.7% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workArts and Humanities: 6 fractional works · 16.7% of its workArcheology: 4 fractional works · 11.9% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workClassics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhysical Sciences: 17 fractional works · 47.6% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 13 fractional works · 37.6% of its workPaleontology: 7 fractional works · 20.9% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 3 fractional works · 8.1% of its workGeochemistry and Petrology: 2 fractional works · 6.7% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 9.1% of its workMechanics of Materials: 3 fractional works · 9.1% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workALL ITS WORKArchaeologicalConservancy35fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences48%Social Sciences51%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 6 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1234.8%
    2. Arts and Humanities616.7%
    1. Earth and Planetary Sciences1337.6%
    2. Engineering39.1%
    3. Computer Science00.9%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.9%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 23.99× its world share, 13 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.60× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringArts and Humanities: 5.77× its world share, 6 worksArts and HumanitiesSocial Sciences: 2.75× its world share, 12 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 24.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 6 fields, with their numbers
  1. Earth and Planetary Sciences23.99×13 works
  2. Arts and Humanities5.77×6 works
  3. Social Sciences2.75×12 works
  4. Engineering0.60×3 works
  5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.20×0 works
  6. Computer Science0.12×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Archaeological Conservancy?

The most cited paper from Archaeological Conservancy is "Origins and genetic legacies of the Caribbean Taino" (Hannes Schroeder et al., 2018), with 130 citations. Next come "Genomic insights into the early peopling of the Caribbean" (117) and "A Reevaluation of the Mogollon-Mimbres Archaeological Sequence" (77).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Origins and genetic legacies of the Caribbean Taino Hannes Schroeder et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Open access 20 Feb 2018 130
2 Genomic insights into the early peopling of the Caribbean Kathrin Nägele et al. · Science Open access 4 Jun 2020 117
3 A Reevaluation of the Mogollon-Mimbres Archaeological Sequence Roger Anyon, Patricia A. Gilman, Steven A. LeBlanc · KIVA Jun 1981 77
4 The Political Economy of Exile in the Great Dismal Swamp Daniel O. Sayers, Patrick Burke, Aaron M. Henry · International Journal of Historical Archaeology 30 Jan 2007 41
5 Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Treponemal Infection in South Florida: An Epidemiological Approach William C. Schaffer, Robert S. Carr · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 24 Aug 2013 3
All 13 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Archaeological Conservancy?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Agricultural Origins, Radiocarbon Dating, Cultural Identity, African Diaspora, Black Feminist Theory, Cultural Heritage, Hominin Genetics and Paleolithic Archaeology.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 24 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 24 words, with their numbers
  1. Agricultural Origins7▲ 642×1 topic
  2. Radiocarbon Dating7▲ 642×1 topic
  3. Cultural Identity6▲ 34×2 topics
  4. African Diaspora6▲ 404×1 topic
  5. Black Feminist Theory6▲ 1740×1 topic
  6. Cultural Heritage4▲ 19×3 topics
  7. Hominin Genetics3▲ 433×1 topic
  8. Paleolithic Archaeology3▲ 433×1 topic
  9. Archaeology3▲ 70×2 topics
  10. Graphene3▲ 13×1 topic
  11. Maritime Archaeology3▲ 493×1 topic
  12. Mediterranean3▲ 101×1 topic
  13. Nanocomposites3▲ 11×1 topic
  14. Remote Sensing3▲ 7.4×2 topics
  15. LiDAR3▲ 188×1 topic
  16. Satellite Imagery3▲ 61×1 topic
  17. Geological Modeling2▲ 449×1 topic
  18. Uncertainty Analysis2▲ 449×1 topic
  19. Archaeological Analysis2▲ 626×1 topic
  20. Iron Production2▲ 626×1 topic
  21. Religious Identity1▲ 62×2 topics
  22. Cultural History1▲ 24×2 topics
  23. Pilgrimage1▲ 155×1 topic
  24. Religious Tourism1▲ 155×1 topic

Which research topics does Archaeological Conservancy publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies, Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology.

  1. 1 Archaeology and ancient environmental studies Paleontology 7 works
  2. 2 Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies Anthropology 6 works
  3. 3 Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology Anthropology 3 works
  4. 4 Maritime and Coastal Archaeology Archeology 3 works
  5. 5 Railway Systems and Materials Science Mechanics of Materials 3 works
  6. 6 Archaeological Research and Protection Space and Planetary Science 3 works
  7. 7 Geological Modeling and Analysis Geochemistry and Petrology 2 works
  8. 8 Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts Archeology 2 works
  9. 9 Religious Tourism and Spaces Geography, Planning and Development 1 works
  10. 10 Historical Architecture and Urbanism History 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available89.8%not open10.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors1.7%domestic only98.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Archaeological Conservancy's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 160% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Archaeological Conservancy as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00014% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Archaeological Conservancy0.00020% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Archaeological Conservancy over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Santa Fe

All research institutions in Santa Fe

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Archaeological Conservancy. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.