Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology is a research topic within Anthropology. Science Explorer counts 30k research works in it since 1950. 42.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the genetic, archaeological, and paleontological evidence related to human evolution, including the origins of modern humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans. It also delves into the behavioral modernity of early humans, stone tool technology, and the environmental factors influencing Pleistocene extinctions.
- Hominin Genetics
- Paleolithic Archaeology
- Modern Human Origins
- Neanderthal Genome
- Early Hominid Fossils
- Pleistocene Extinctions
- Stone Tool Technology
- Ancient Human Behavior
- Cultural Innovation
- Genomic History
- Research works
- 30k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 13k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 42.4% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +9% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology research?
By volume, the United States and France publish the most (723 and 591 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 723 works
- 2 France 591 works
- 3 United Kingdom 352 works
- 4 China 349 works
- 5 Spain 347 works
- 6 Germany 233 works
- 7 Russia 197 works
- 8 Argentina 195 works
- 9 Australia 184 works
- 10 Italy 123 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique publishes the most Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology research, followed by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas and University of the Witwatersrand.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFrance 73 works
- 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasArgentina 58 works
- 3 University of the WitwatersrandSouth Africa 42 works
- 4 University of TübingenGermany 37 works
- 5 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 36 works
- 6 Department of ArchaeologySri Lanka 35 works
- 7 Travaux et Recherches Archéologiques sur les Cultures, les Espaces et les SociétésFrance 34 works
- 8 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 30 works
- 9 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 27 works
- 10 Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució SocialSpain 26 works
Who are the leading researchers in Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology include Hai Cheng, Bernd Kromer and William M. Gardner.
- 1 Hai Cheng China 2.9k citations
- 2 Bernd Kromer Germany 2.7k citations
- 3 William M. Gardner United States 2.7k citations
- 4 Alex Bayliss United Kingdom 2.6k citations
- 5 Christopher Bronk Ramsey United Kingdom 2.4k citations
- 6 A. Townsend Peterson United States 2.1k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology research done?
The largest centres of Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology research in 2022–2025 are Paris (France), Beijing (China), Buenos Aires (Argentina) and Madrid (Spain). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Metz, Tarragona and Pessac.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Paris France 209 works
- 2 Beijing China 143 works
- 3 Buenos Aires Argentina 92 works
- 4 Madrid Spain 85 works
- 5 London United Kingdom 72 works
- 6 Johannesburg South Africa 61 works
- 7 Oxford United Kingdom 55 works
- 8 Toulouse France 55 works
- 9 Moscow Russia 54 works
- 10 Tübingen Germany 53 works
Where it is the local speciality
- MetzFR · 25.0 works83×
- TarragonaES · 46.2 works53×
- PessacFR · 27.9 works39×
- NanterreFR · 36.2 works27×
- TübingenDE · 52.7 works22×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology?
Among universities, judged by research, University of Tübingen, University of the Witwatersrand and Universitat Rovira i Virgili score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of TübingenGermany | 74.9 | 64.2% | 22.4× | 37 | +69.8% |
| 2 | University of the WitwatersrandSouth Africa | 68.8 | 52.6% | 23.1× | 42 | +35.5% |
| 3 | Universitat Rovira i VirgiliSpain | 68.1 | 65.7% | 30.4× | 20 | +44.2% |
| 4 | University of AlgarvePortugal | 64.8 | 60.6% | 42.3× | 16 | +38.3% |
| 5 | Griffith UniversityAustralia | 64.5 | 54.7% | 8.1× | 14 | +275.4% |
| 6 | University of FerraraItaly | 61.7 | 64.9% | 13.1× | 10 | +47.5% |
| 7 | Australian National UniversityAustralia | 61.3 | 49.5% | 11.3× | 24 | +14.8% |
| 8 | Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSpain | 60.8 | 58.4% | 9.7× | 18 | +4.0% |
| 9 | University of JohannesburgSouth Africa | 60.4 | 67.3% | 6.9× | 19 | +56.5% |
| 10 | Universidad de AlcaláSpain | 59.4 | 59.9% | 11.8× | 9 | +64.5% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 9% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.