Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Anthropology

History of Colonial Brazil

History of Colonial Brazil is a research topic within Anthropology. Science Explorer counts 8.7k research works in it since 1950. 9.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the history of Brazilian slavery, society, and the African diaspora in colonial Brazil. It delves into the social dynamics, racial identity, abolitionism, cultural representation, economic empowerment, written culture, and religious practices during this period.

  • Brazilian slavery
  • colonial Brazil
  • African diaspora
  • social dynamics
  • racial identity
  • abolitionism
  • cultural representation
  • economic empowerment
  • written culture
  • religious practices
Research works
8.7k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
789
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+12%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead History of Colonial Brazil research?

By volume, Brazil and Portugal publish the most (1.3k and 135 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Brazil 1.3k works
  2. 2 Portugal 135 works
  3. 3 United States 67 works
  4. 4 Spain 36 works
  5. 5 France 33 works
  6. 6 Argentina 17 works
  7. 7 Chile 15 works
  8. 8 Italy 14 works
  9. 9 Germany 13 works
  10. 10 United Kingdom 12 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Brazil: 79.5%Portugal: 8.1%United States: 4.0%Spain: 2.2%6 others listed: 6.2%80%largest
Brazil1,327 · 79.5%Portugal135 · 8.1%United States67 · 4.0%Spain36 · 2.2%6 others listed104 · 6.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead History of Colonial Brazil research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidade de São Paulo publishes the most History of Colonial Brazil research, followed by Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro and Universidade Federal do Pará.

Who are the leading researchers in History of Colonial Brazil?

The most-cited researchers publishing on History of Colonial Brazil include Carlos Fiolhais, Stanley J. Stein and Herbert S. Klein.

  1. 1 Carlos Fiolhais Portugal 3.9k citations
  2. 2 Stanley J. Stein United States 278 citations
  3. 3 Herbert S. Klein United States 199 citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is History of Colonial Brazil research done?

The largest centres of History of Colonial Brazil research in 2022–2025 are São Paulo (Brazil), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), Lisbon (Portugal) and Salvador (Brazil). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Seropédica, São Luís and Niterói.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 São Paulo Brazil 220 works
  2. 2 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 147 works
  3. 3 Lisbon Portugal 85 works
  4. 4 Salvador Brazil 52 works
  5. 5 Belém Brazil 52 works
  6. 6 Brasília Brazil 50 works
  7. 7 Recife Brazil 49 works
  8. 8 Belo Horizonte Brazil 47 works
  9. 9 Niterói Brazil 38 works
  10. 10 São Luís Brazil 33 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. SeropédicaBR · 20.8 works92×
  2. São LuísBR · 32.7 works56×
  3. NiteróiBR · 38.1 works47×
  4. Juiz de ForaBR · 23.3 works47×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in History of Colonial Brazil than the world average.

See History of Colonial Brazil on the map

Where is the best place to study History of Colonial Brazil?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Lisbon, Universidade de São Paulo and Universidade Federal de Pernambuco score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 12.61%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Lisbon: 22, 15.3%Universidade de São Paulo: 78, 10.7%Universidade Federal de Pernambuco: 20, 12.4%Universidade Nova de Lisboa: 32, 14.2%Universidade Federal do Pará: 39, 11.8%Universidade Federal de São Paulo: 24, 14.1%Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro: 37, 11.0%Universidade Federal do Maranhão: 23, 13.7%Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: 44, 6.6%Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina: 20, 16.3%University of LisbonUniversidade Nova de…Universidade Federal…Universidade de São …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of LisbonPortugal 39.515.3%21.8×22 +147.3%
2 Universidade de São PauloBrazil 37.610.7%27.0×78 +42.7%
3 Universidade Federal de PernambucoBrazil 36.012.4%24.2×20 +218.4%
4 Universidade Nova de LisboaPortugal 34.614.2%67.2×32 +41.7%
5 Universidade Federal do ParáBrazil 32.411.8%58.7×39 +61.9%
6 Universidade Federal de São PauloBrazil 32.214.1%35.6×24 +78.8%
7 Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazil 31.011.0%29.7×37 +53.0%
8 Universidade Federal do MaranhãoBrazil 31.013.7%69.0×23 +86.4%
9 Universidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroBrazil 30.76.6%58.8×44 +99.7%
10 Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaBrazil 29.516.3%19.2×20 +39.4%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is History of Colonial Brazil research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 12% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are History of Colonial Brazil.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.