Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
In research, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco stands highest in Agricultural and Biological Sciences (#432 of 3,409 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#3,641 of 12,888 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#3,459 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Information Systems and Management — Forestry is 20.4× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #4,378 of 28,054 · #5,576 all time
- Rank in Brazil
- #46 of 714
- Research works
- 14k ▲ 49% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 116k 8.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 72% world 28%
What is Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #432 of 3,409 | 9.0% | 742 | #401 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #3,641 of 12,888 | 9.8% | 1,085 | #6343 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #3,459 of 10,521 | 8.5% | 984 | #4077 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #2,670 of 7,800 | 8.7% | 957 | #3179 | |
| Social SciencesField | #2,693 of 6,365 | 7.5% | 610 | #3431 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #1,538 of 3,551 | 6.9% | 504 | #1844 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #5,195 of 11,982 | 6.6% | 323 | #6951 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #2,026 of 4,667 | 16.0% | 207 | #3289 | |
| EducationSubfield | #1,014 of 1,892 | 7.6% | 273 | #1267 | |
| Arts and HumanitiesField | #1,236 of 1,998 | 10.0% | 143 | #2296 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences#401 #432
- Physical Sciences#6,343 #3,641
- Social Sciences#4,077 #3,459
- Life Sciences#3,179 #2,670
- Social Sciences#3,431 #2,693
- Environmental Science#1,844 #1,538
- Health Sciences#6,951 #5,195
- Computer Science#3,289 #2,026
- Education#1,267 #1,014
- Arts and Humanities#2,296 #1,236
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Forestry takes 20.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- ForestrySubfield · 71.2 works20×
- Nature and Landscape ConservationSubfield · 62.1 works7.8×
- Information Systems and ManagementSubfield · 72.2 works7.5×
- Aquatic ScienceSubfield · 43.6 works7.2×
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield · 133.6 works6.8×
- Agronomy and Crop ScienceSubfield · 48.4 works6.1×
- VeterinaryField · 27.8 works6.1×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 6.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Veterinary 6.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4.7×
- Environmental Science 3.0×
- Decision Sciences 2.7×
- Arts and Humanities 1.5×
- Social Sciences 1.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.1×
- Mathematics 0.9×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.9×
- Computer Science 0.8×
- Nursing 0.7×
- Energy 0.6×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Chemistry 0.6×
- Psychology 0.5×
- Dentistry 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco?
Ranked on the composite score, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Eduardo Sevilla Guzmán and Sami Jorge Michereff lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco.
- 1 Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque Brazil · #66,654 worldwide 478 citations · 93 works
- 2 Eduardo Sevilla Guzmán Brazil · #131,302 worldwide 69 citations · 28 works
- 3 Sami Jorge Michereff Brazil · #135,094 worldwide 174 citations · 39 works
- 4 Marcos Paz Saraiva Câmara Brazil · #165,367 worldwide 198 citations · 23 works
- 5 Lília Willadino Brazil · #250,502 worldwide 69 citations · 29 works
- 6 Terezinha Rangel Câmara Brazil · #253,158 worldwide 55 citations · 22 works
- 7 Ana Lícia Patriota Feliciano Brazil · #259,747 worldwide 39 citations · 33 works
- 8 Ângela Maria Vieira Batista Brazil · #261,854 worldwide 21 citations · 38 works
- 9 Bruno Silva Leite Brazil · #269,034 worldwide 15 citations · 27 works
- 10 Antônio André Cunha Callado Brazil · #283,563 worldwide 11 citations · 52 works
Which keywords describe research at Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Teacher Training, Biodiversity, Sustainability, Qualitative Research, Public Policy, Online Learning, Curriculum Development and Social Inequality.
- Teaching Methodologies
- Biogeography
- Active Learning
- Critical Pedagogy
- Educational Games
- Distance Learning
- Quantitative Research
- Marketing Strategies
- Educational Reform
- Research Methods
- Media Education
- Genetic Diversity
- Waste Management
- Science Education
- Social Inequality
- Public Policy
- Educational Technology
- Online Learning
- Biodiversity
- Sustainability
- Teacher Training
- Climate Change
- Qualitative Research
- Curriculum Development
- Environmental Impact
- Sustainable Development
- Agroecology
- Soil Fertility
- Food Security
- Social Network Analysis
- WebQuests
- Data Analysis
- Innovation Management
- Organizational Management
- Inclusive Education
- Pedagogical Practices
- Educational Policies
- Water Resources
- Environmental Education
- Didactic Models
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Teacher Training235▲ 11×12 topics
- Sustainability225▲ 2.8×66 topics
- Climate Change178▲ 1.97×75 topics
- Biodiversity169▲ 6.8×30 topics
- Qualitative Research158▲ 5.4×12 topics
- Online Learning145▲ 5.2×12 topics
- Curriculum Development134▲ 5.7×7 topics
- Educational Technology130▲ 3.3×23 topics
- Environmental Impact128▲ 2.2×47 topics
- Public Policy128▲ 7.7×14 topics
- Sustainable Development117▲ 2.2×28 topics
- Social Inequality101▲ 11×8 topics
- Agroecology89▲ 18×5 topics
- Science Education88▲ 42×3 topics
- Soil Fertility87▲ 12×8 topics
- Waste Management85▲ 6.2×9 topics
- Food Security81▲ 4.4×18 topics
- Genetic Diversity78▲ 5.3×19 topics
- Social Network Analysis78▲ 19×3 topics
- Media Education77▲ 41×1 topic
- WebQuests77▲ 41×1 topic
- Research Methods75▲ 14×2 topics
- Data Analysis73▲ 8.0×5 topics
- Educational Reform72▲ 17×3 topics
- Innovation Management71▲ 13×3 topics
- Marketing Strategies71▲ 21×2 topics
- Organizational Management71▲ 32×1 topic
- Quantitative Research71▲ 15×1 topic
- Inclusive Education71▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Distance Learning70▲ 6.2×6 topics
- Pedagogical Practices69▲ 23×3 topics
- Educational Games68▲ 21×2 topics
- Educational Policies67▲ 17×2 topics
- Critical Pedagogy67▲ 23×2 topics
- Water Resources67▲ 8.2×7 topics
- Active Learning67▲ 11×5 topics
- Environmental Education66▲ 13×5 topics
- Biogeography65▲ 7.4×19 topics
- Didactic Models64▲ 46×1 topic
- Teaching Methodologies64▲ 14×1 topic
Which research topics does Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education and Digital Technologies, Business and Management Studies, Education Pedagogy and Practices and Science and Education Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 77 works
- 2 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 71 works
- 3 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 67 works
- 4 Science and Education Research Education 64 works
- 5 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 61 works
- 6 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 58 works
- 7 Agricultural and Food Sciences Forestry 55 works
- 8 Geography and Environmental Studies Water Science and Technology 44 works
- 9 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 40 works
- 10 Growth and nutrition in plants Plant Science 40 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 49% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Recife
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
- Universidade de Pernambuco
- Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
- Centro Universitário Maurício de Nassau
- Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
- Secretaria de Educação de Pernambuco
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.