Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Anthropology

Latin American Cultural Politics

Latin American Cultural Politics is a research topic within Anthropology. Science Explorer counts 8.6k research works in it since 1950. 11.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the coloniality of power and knowledge in Latin America, focusing on decolonization, Eurocentrism, postcolonialism, and social movements. It delves into topics such as Buen Vivir, interculturality, and the impact of globalization on indigenous communities. The papers critically examine the historical, social, and epistemological dimensions of coloniality and aim to redefine knowledge production from a decolonial perspective.

  • Coloniality
  • Decolonization
  • Latin America
  • Eurocentrism
  • Postcolonialism
  • Epistemology
  • Social Movements
  • Buen Vivir
  • Interculturality
  • Globalization
Research works
8.6k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
952
per year above
Top-10% rate
11.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+14%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Latin American Cultural Politics research?

By volume, Brazil and Mexico publish the most (257 and 237 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Brazil 257 works
  2. 2 Mexico 237 works
  3. 3 Argentina 223 works
  4. 4 Colombia 184 works
  5. 5 Spain 170 works
  6. 6 United States 103 works
  7. 7 Peru 89 works
  8. 8 Chile 84 works
  9. 9 Ecuador 59 works
  10. 10 France 37 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Brazil: 17.8%Mexico: 16.4%Argentina: 15.4%Colombia: 12.7%6 others listed: 37.6%18%largest
Brazil257 · 17.8%Mexico237 · 16.4%Argentina223 · 15.4%Colombia184 · 12.7%6 others listed543 · 37.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Latin American Cultural Politics research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México publishes the most Latin American Cultural Politics research, followed by Universidad de Buenos Aires and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas.

Who are the leading researchers in Latin American Cultural Politics?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Latin American Cultural Politics include Ramón Grosfoguel, Arturo Escobar and Walter D. Mignolo.

  1. 1 Ramón Grosfoguel United States 776 citations
  2. 2 Arturo Escobar Cuba 620 citations
  3. 3 Walter D. Mignolo United States 581 citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Latin American Cultural Politics research done?

The largest centres of Latin American Cultural Politics research in 2022–2025 are Mexico City (Mexico), Buenos Aires (Argentina), Bogotá (Colombia) and Lima (Peru). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Córdoba.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Mexico City Mexico 104 works
  2. 2 Buenos Aires Argentina 96 works
  3. 3 Bogotá Colombia 86 works
  4. 4 Lima Peru 60 works
  5. 5 Madrid Spain 59 works
  6. 6 Santiago Chile 45 works
  7. 7 São Paulo Brazil 38 works
  8. 8 Medellín Colombia 26 works
  9. 9 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 26 works
  10. 10 Quito Ecuador 23 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. CórdobaAR · 20.6 works44×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Latin American Cultural Politics than the world average.

See Latin American Cultural Politics on the map

Where is the best place to study Latin American Cultural Politics?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Universidad de Buenos Aires score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 14.31%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidad Nacional de Córdoba: 16, 23.6%Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 44, 12.6%Universidad de Buenos Aires: 38, 10.2%El Colegio de México: 10, 22.2%Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana: 13, 14.9%Universidad de Guadalajara: 12, 10.7%Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú: 12, 19.4%National University of San Marcos: 28, 7.9%Universidad de Antioquia: 15, 11.9%Universidad de Oriente: 9, 9.7%Universidad Nacional…El Colegio de MéxicoUniversidad Nacional…Universidad de Bueno…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidad Nacional de CórdobaArgentina 72.423.6%59.7×16 +62.4%
2 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico 67.612.6%28.3×44 +16.4%
3 Universidad de Buenos AiresArgentina 64.810.2%59.1×38 +48.8%
4 El Colegio de MéxicoMexico 60.622.2%82.6×10 +39.6%
5 Universidad Autónoma MetropolitanaMexico 57.714.9%37.7×13 +80.7%
6 Universidad de GuadalajaraMexico 57.710.7%25.0×12 +162.1%
7 Pontificia Universidad Católica del PerúPeru 57.119.4%47.7×12 -35.3%
8 National University of San MarcosPeru 56.97.9%70.2×28 +63.6%
9 Universidad de AntioquiaColombia 55.911.9%39.0×15 +30.3%
10 Universidad de OrienteVenezuela 52.99.7%336.4×9

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Latin American Cultural Politics research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 14% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Latin American Cultural Politics.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.