Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Radnor · United States

Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration

theaftd.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
15
▲ 503% vs 2018-21
Citations
181
12.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.4%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
50%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%
Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration

Not ranked overall: Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration work in?

In all years, 64% of research at Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration is in Health Sciences, 20% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (61%), Neuroscience (15%), Psychology (10%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 10 fractional works · 64.1% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 60.9% of its workNeurology: 4 fractional works · 29.4% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 2 fractional works · 12.5% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 8.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 3.4% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 20.1% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 10.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 10.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 15.6% of its workNeuroscience: 2 fractional works · 15.0% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 2 fractional works · 14.6% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKAssociation forFrontotemporal…15fractional works, all years
Life Sciences16%Physical Sciences0%Health Sciences64%Social Sciences20%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 10 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine960.9%
    2. Health Professions03.2%
    1. Psychology210.1%
    2. Social Sciences14.1%
    3. Decision Sciences02.3%
    4. Arts and Humanities02.2%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.4%
    1. Neuroscience215.0%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.6%
    1. Computer Science00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 11.90× its world share, 2 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceHealth Professions: 1.02× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.33× its world share, 7 worksMedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.89× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 3.16× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 11.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Neuroscience11.90×2 works
  2. Medicine3.33×7 works
  3. Psychology3.16×1 works
  4. Health Professions1.02×0 works
  5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.89×0 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.13×0 works
  7. Social Sciences0.12×0 works
  8. Computer Science0.03×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration?

Ranked on the quality score, Shana G. Dodge and Sharon S. Denny lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration.

  1. 1 Shana G. Dodge United States · #2,415,826 worldwide 93 citations · 16 works
  2. 2 Sharon S. Denny United States · #3,520,442 worldwide 222 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration

What are the most cited papers from Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration?

The most cited paper from Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration is "Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria" (Günter U. Höglinger et al., 2017), with 2,430 citations. Next come "Utility of the global CDR® plus NACC FTLD rating and development of scoring rules: Data from the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Consortium" (170) and "Which ante mortem clinical features predict progressive supranuclear palsy pathology?" (169).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria Günter U. Höglinger et al. · Movement Disorders Open access 3 May 2017 2,430
2 Utility of the global CDR® plus NACC FTLD rating and development of scoring rules: Data from the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Consortium Toji Miyagawa et al. · Alzheimer s & Dementia Open access 2020 170
3 Which ante mortem clinical features predict progressive supranuclear palsy pathology? Gesine Respondek et al. · Movement Disorders Open access 13 May 2017 169
4 How to apply the movement disorder society criteria for diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy Max‐Joseph Grimm et al. · Movement Disorders Open access 18 Mar 2019 144
5 Pathological Influences on Clinical Heterogeneity in Lewy Body Diseases David G. Coughlin, Howard I. Hurtig, David John Irwin · Movement Disorders Open access 29 Oct 2019 138
All 64 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research.

Genetic Neurodegenerativ…2Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases: 2 fractional worksAmyotrophic Lateral Scle…2Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research: 2 fractional worksParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments: 1 fractional worksDementia and Cognitive I…1Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research: 1 fractional worksVoice and Speech Disorders0Voice and Speech Disorders: 0 fractional worksCerebral Palsy and Movem…0Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders: 0 fractional worksHead and Neck Cancer Studies: 0 fractional worksFamily and Disability Support Research: 0 fractional worksBiomedical Ethics and Regulation: 0 fractional worksNeurological disorders and treatments: 0 fractional works
Cellular and Molecular NeuroscienceNeurologyPsychiatry and Mental healthPhysiology2 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2 works
  2. 2 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research Neurology 2 works
  3. 3 Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments Neurology 1 works
  4. 4 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
  5. 5 Voice and Speech Disorders Physiology 0 works
  6. 6 Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  7. 7 Head and Neck Cancer Studies Otorhinolaryngology 0 works
  8. 8 Family and Disability Support Research Clinical Psychology 0 works
  9. 9 Biomedical Ethics and Regulation Physiology 0 works
  10. 10 Neurological disorders and treatments Neurology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available49.6%not open50.4%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors9.3%domestic only90.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 503% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000039% in 2024.

still counting0.000025%0.000050%0.000075%Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration0.000063% in 20252020

Fractional works of Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Radnor

All research institutions in Radnor

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration. Posts are plain text and can be reported.