Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Berkeley · United States

Center for Accessible Technology

cforat.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
12
◆ 1% vs 2018-21
Citations
130
11.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
20.7%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
50%
world 40%
International
30%
world 18%
Center for Accessible Technology

Not ranked overall: Center for Accessible Technology is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Center for Accessible Technology work in?

In all years, 51% of research at Center for Accessible Technology is in Social Sciences, 34% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (23%), Medicine (20%), Health Professions (13%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 6 fractional works · 50.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 22.6% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 8.7% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 12.1% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 7.2% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 8.7% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 5.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 5.6% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workHealth Sciences: 4 fractional works · 33.8% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 20.3% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 9.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 3.8% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 13.5% of its workOccupational Therapy: 1 fractional works · 6.7% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 10.0% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 5.3% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 5.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 5.3% of its workALL ITS WORKCenter forAccessible…12fractional works, all years
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences10%Health Sciences34%Social Sciences51%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences322.6%
    2. Arts and Humanities112.1%
    3. Psychology18.7%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting15.6%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.9%
    1. Medicine220.3%
    2. Health Professions213.5%
    1. Computer Science03.5%
    2. Engineering02.6%
    3. Chemistry02.0%
    4. Environmental Science01.9%
    1. Neuroscience15.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Neuroscience: 3.93× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 10.47× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.27× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.53× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.63× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.55× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 10.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 9 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions10.47×1 works
  2. Neuroscience3.93×0 works
  3. Social Sciences2.55×1 works
  4. Medicine1.27×1 works
  5. Psychology0.63×0 works
  6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.60×0 works
  7. Arts and Humanities0.53×0 works
  8. Computer Science0.47×0 works
  9. Engineering0.07×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Center for Accessible Technology?

The most cited paper from Center for Accessible Technology is "Opening Doors or Slamming Them Shut? Online Learning Practices and Students with Disabilities" (Sheryl E. Burgstahler, 2015), with 90 citations. Next come "Telehealth and digital health innovations: A mixed landscape of access" (54) and "Evaluation of Existing and New Periodic Tables of the Elements for the Chemistry Education of Blind Students" (34).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Opening Doors or Slamming Them Shut? Online Learning Practices and Students with Disabilities Sheryl E. Burgstahler · Social Inclusion Open access 28 Dec 2015 90
2 Telehealth and digital health innovations: A mixed landscape of access Jimmy Phuong, Patricia Ordóñez, Jerry Cao et al. · PLOS Digital Health Open access 15 Dec 2023 54
3 Evaluation of Existing and New Periodic Tables of the Elements for the Chemistry Education of Blind Students Dennis Fantin, Marc Sutton, Lena Josefine Daumann et al. · Journal of Chemical Education 22 Feb 2016 34
4 One model to rule them all, one model to bind them? A critique of the use of accessibility-related models in post-secondary education Jane Seale, Sheryl E. Burgstahler, Alice Havel · Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning Open access 19 Feb 2020 18
5 Audible pedestrian signals as directional beacons Robert S. Wall, Daniel H. Ashmead, Billie Louise Bentzen et al. · International Congress Series Sep 2005 5
All 19 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Center for Accessible Technology publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Retirement, Disability, and Employment, Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention.

Retirement, Disability, …1Retirement, Disability, and Employment: 1 fractional worksAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility: 1 fractional worksCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders: 0 fractional worksBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention: 0 fractional worksAutism Spectrum Disorder…0Autism Spectrum Disorder Research: 0 fractional worksParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments: 0 fractional worksChild Development and Digital Technology: 0 fractional worksFamily and Disability Support Research: 0 fractional worksGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology: 0 fractional worksInfant Development and Preterm Care: 0 fractional works
DemographyOccupational TherapyPsychiatry and Mental healthPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Retirement, Disability, and Employment Demography 1 works
  2. 2 Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility Occupational Therapy 1 works
  3. 3 Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  4. 4 Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 0 works
  5. 5 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
  6. 6 Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments Neurology 0 works
  7. 7 Child Development and Digital Technology Education 0 works
  8. 8 Family and Disability Support Research Clinical Psychology 0 works
  9. 9 Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology Human-Computer Interaction 0 works
  10. 10 Infant Development and Preterm Care Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available50.3%not open49.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors30.1%domestic only69.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Center for Accessible Technology's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 1% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Center for Accessible Technology as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000026% in 2023.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Center for Accessible Technology0.000038% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Center for Accessible Technology over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Berkeley

All research institutions in Berkeley

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Center for Accessible Technology. Posts are plain text and can be reported.