Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Washington D.C. · United States

Center for the National Interest

cftni.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
68
▼ 6% vs 2013–17
Citations
1.3k
18.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
22.5%
record average 16.5%
Open access
34%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Center for the National Interest is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Immunology and Microbiology: 0.36× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.82× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.77× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.55× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringDentistry: 2.73× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.91× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.02× its world share, 3 worksMedicineNursing: 2.03× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.38× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.86× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 2.37× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 2.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Center for the National Interest?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Russia, Nationalism, Power, Politics, Diplomacy, International Law and Global Governance.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Globalization11▲ 8.6×18 topics
  2. Nationalism3▲ 8.3×4 topics
  3. Russia3▲ 136×3 topics
  4. Human Rights3▲ 5.0×3 topics
  5. Power3▲ 54×2 topics
  6. Diplomacy3▲ 43×2 topics
  7. International Law3▲ 15×2 topics
  8. Politics3▲ 15×5 topics
  9. Economy2▲ 39×2 topics
  10. Global Governance2▲ 17×1 topic
  11. International Institutions2▲ 174×1 topic
  12. Israel2▲ 94×1 topic
  13. Palestine2▲ 58×1 topic
  14. Social Justice2▲ 6.1×5 topics
  15. Diversity2▲ 16×3 topics
  16. Higher Education2▲ 7.7×6 topics
  17. Middle East2▲ 55×2 topics
  18. Cultural Competence2▲ 22×3 topics
  19. Geopolitics2▲ 25×2 topics
  20. Radicalization2▲ 117×1 topic
  21. Terrorism2▲ 65×1 topic
  22. Ukraine2▲ 124×2 topics
  23. Corporate Governance2▲ 4.5×4 topics
  24. International Relations2▲ 12×2 topics
  25. Political Economy2▲ 9.7×3 topics
  26. Colonialism2▲ 4.8×3 topics
  27. Capitalism2▲ 27×1 topic
  28. Hybrid Warfare2▲ 243×1 topic
  29. Military Strategy2▲ 243×1 topic
  30. Religion2▲ 3.8×2 topics
  31. Transition2▲ 23×1 topic
  32. Secularism1▲ 19×3 topics
  33. Decision Making1▲ 8.6×2 topics
  34. Empire1▲ 22×2 topics
  35. Migration1▲ 6.4×3 topics
  36. Gender Equality1▲ 8.6×2 topics
  37. Sovereignty1▲ 17×3 topics
  38. Cosmopolitanism1▲ 16×2 topics
  39. Patient Satisfaction1▲ 6.7×6 topics
  40. Territorial Governance1▲ 11×2 topics

Which research topics does Center for the National Interest publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Russia and Soviet political economy, European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies, Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education and Glaucoma and retinal disorders.

Russia and Soviet politi…1Russia and Soviet political economy: 1 fractional worksEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies: 0 fractional worksCatholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education: 0 fractional worksGlaucoma and retinal disorders: 0 fractional worksSpeech and dialogue systems: 0 fractional worksSpeech Recognition and Synthesis: 0 fractional worksInternational Relations …0International Relations and Foreign Policy: 0 fractional worksPhilosophy and Historical Thought: 0 fractional worksPolitical Theology and Sovereignty: 0 fractional worksMilitary Strategy and Te…0Military Strategy and Technology: 0 fractional works
Political Science and International RelationsSafety ResearchOphthalmologyArtificial Intelligence3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Russia and Soviet political economy Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  2. 2 European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  3. 3 Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education Safety Research 0 works
  4. 4 Glaucoma and retinal disorders Ophthalmology 0 works
  5. 5 Speech and dialogue systems Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  6. 6 Speech Recognition and Synthesis Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  7. 7 International Relations and Foreign Policy Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  8. 8 Philosophy and Historical Thought Philosophy 0 works
  9. 9 Political Theology and Sovereignty Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  10. 10 Military Strategy and Technology Control and Systems Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available33.6%not open66.4%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors21.5%domestic only78.5%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Center for the National Interest's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 6% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Washington D.C.

All research institutions in Washington D.C.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.