Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence is a research topic within Sociology and Political Science. Science Explorer counts 25k research works in it since 1951. 23.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the multifaceted aspects of terrorism, including its causes, effects, and countermeasures. It delves into the psychology, sociology, and economics of radicalization, as well as the impact of terrorism on global politics, economies, and societies. The papers also examine the role of education, poverty, and political freedom in relation to terrorism.

  • Terrorism
  • Radicalization
  • Extremism
  • Violent
  • Political
  • Globalization
  • Religious
  • Counterterrorism
  • Psychological
  • Social
Research works
25k
fractional, since 1951
In the world top 10%
6.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
23.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+45%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1.1k and 478 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.1k works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 478 works
  3. 3 Nigeria 435 works
  4. 4 Türkiye 290 works
  5. 5 Germany 249 works
  6. 6 Indonesia 244 works
  7. 7 Pakistan 220 works
  8. 8 India 175 works
  9. 9 Russia 174 works
  10. 10 Australia 174 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 31.6%United Kingdom: 13.4%Nigeria: 12.2%Türkiye: 8.1%6 others listed: 34.7%32%largest
United States1,128 · 31.6%United Kingdom478 · 13.4%Nigeria435 · 12.2%Türkiye290 · 8.1%6 others listed1,237 · 34.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Indonesia publishes the most Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence research, followed by Deakin University and Ludovika University of Public Service.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of IndonesiaIndonesia 33 works
  2. 2 Deakin UniversityAustralia 27 works
  3. 3 Ludovika University of Public ServiceHungary 25 works
  4. 4 University of NigeriaNigeria 25 works
  5. 5 Institute for Peace Research and Security PolicyGermany 22 works
  6. 6 King's College LondonUnited Kingdom 22 works
  7. 7 University of IbadanNigeria 21 works
  8. 8 Leiden UniversityNetherlands 19 works
  9. 9 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 18 works
  10. 10 Georgetown UniversityUnited States 18 works

Where is Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence research done?

The largest centres of Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Washington D.C. (United States), Moscow (Russia) and Istanbul (Türkiye). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Abuja.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 99 works
  2. 2 Washington D.C. United States 95 works
  3. 3 Moscow Russia 93 works
  4. 4 Istanbul Türkiye 68 works
  5. 5 New York United States 62 works
  6. 6 Islamabad Pakistan 57 works
  7. 7 Ankara Türkiye 57 works
  8. 8 Budapest Hungary 49 works
  9. 9 Tehran Iran 40 works
  10. 10 Warsaw Poland 39 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. AbujaNG · 29.7 works19×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence than the world average.

See Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence on the map

Where is the best place to study Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Nigeria, Leiden University and Deakin University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 31.74%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Nigeria: 25, 29.2%Leiden University: 19, 44.4%Deakin University: 27, 13.4%Swansea University: 10, 56.7%Royal Holloway University of London: 12, 40.8%Islamia University of Bahawalpur: 11, 35.7%University of Ibadan: 21, 13.0%University of Huddersfield: 8, 23.7%University of Oslo: 15, 37.0%Charles Sturt University: 10, 23.5%Swansea UniversityLeiden UniversityUniversity of NigeriaDeakin University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of NigeriaNigeria 75.629.2%17.3×25 +381.5%
2 Leiden UniversityNetherlands 73.744.4%10.3×19 +55.5%
3 Deakin UniversityAustralia 70.013.4%10.6×27 +239.8%
4 Swansea UniversityUnited Kingdom 63.556.7%8.9×10 -7.0%
5 Royal Holloway University of LondonUnited Kingdom 61.640.8%17.2×12 +36.7%
6 Islamia University of BahawalpurPakistan 61.435.7%11.5×11 +59.6%
7 University of IbadanNigeria 60.413.0%15.2×21 +117.6%
8 University of HuddersfieldUnited Kingdom 59.923.7%14.1×8 +562.2%
9 University of OsloNorway 58.937.0%5.6×15 +126.8%
10 Charles Sturt UniversityAustralia 58.323.5%12.9×10 +182.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 45% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.