Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Flint · United States

Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

mott.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
7
fractional, all time
Citations
66
10.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
31%
world 40%
International
6%
world 18%
Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

Not ranked overall: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Charles Stewart Mott Foundation work in?

In all years, 66% of research at Charles Stewart Mott Foundation is in Social Sciences, 20% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (51%), Medicine (15%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (8%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 4 fractional works · 66.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 50.7% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 19.1% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 14.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 12.5% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 7.6% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 7.6% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 7.6% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 6.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 20.3% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 15.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 6.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 5.0% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 10.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 5.0% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 5.0% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workALL ITS WORKCharles StewartMott Foundation7fractional works, all years
Life Sciences10%Physical Sciences4%Health Sciences20%Social Sciences66%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 10 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences350.7%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance07.6%
    3. Psychology07.6%
    1. Medicine115.3%
    2. Health Professions05.0%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences05.0%
    2. Neuroscience02.6%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics02.6%
    1. Engineering03.1%
    2. Environmental Science00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Neuroscience: 4.72× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceEngineering: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.28× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.45× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.39× its world share, 1 worksMedicinePsychology: 7.55× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.32× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 7.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology7.55×0 works
  2. Neuroscience4.72×0 works
  3. Medicine2.39×1 works
  4. Health Professions1.45×0 works
  5. Social Sciences1.32×0 works
  6. Environmental Science0.28×0 works
  7. Engineering0.09×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Charles Stewart Mott Foundation?

The most cited paper from Charles Stewart Mott Foundation is "After-School Programs Are Making a Difference" (Marianne Kugler, 2001), with 38 citations. Next come "After-School Programs for Adolescents" (21) and "Survey Response in a Statewide Social Experiment: Differences in Being Located and Collaborating, by Race and Hispanic Origin" (9).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 After-School Programs Are Making a Difference Marianne Kugler · NASSP Bulletin Sep 2001 38
2 After-School Programs for Adolescents Adriana de Kanter · NASSP Bulletin Sep 2001 21
3 Survey Response in a Statewide Social Experiment: Differences in Being Located and Collaborating, by Race and Hispanic Origin Yunju Nam, Lisa Reyes Mason, Yeon-Joo Kim et al. · Social Work Research Open access 7 Feb 2013 9
4 Ensuring quality and sustainability in after‐school programs An‐Me Chung, Adriana A. de Kanter, Robert M. Stonehill · New Directions for Youth Development Jun 2002 2
5 A New Generation and New Thinking in Vietnamese Legal Scholarship Mark Sidel · Asian Journal of Comparative Law Open access Dec 2016 1
All 7 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Charles Stewart Mott Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: COVID-19 and Mental Health, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, Sex and Gender in Healthcare and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.

COVID-19 and Mental Health0COVID-19 and Mental Health: 0 fractional worksMaternal Mental Health D…0Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum: 0 fractional worksSex and Gender in Healthcare: 0 fractional worksPsychology of Moral and …0Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment: 0 fractional worksRacial and Ethnic Identi…0Racial and Ethnic Identity Research: 0 fractional worksVaccine Coverage and Hes…0Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy: 0 fractional worksCardiovascular Health an…0Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors: 0 fractional worksFamily and Disability Support Research: 0 fractional worksResilience and Mental Health: 0 fractional worksBreastfeeding Practices and Influences: 0 fractional works
Clinical PsychologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthCognitive NeuroscienceSociology and Political Science3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 COVID-19 and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 0 works
  2. 2 Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  3. 3 Sex and Gender in Healthcare Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  4. 4 Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
  5. 5 Racial and Ethnic Identity Research Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  6. 6 Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Health 0 works
  7. 7 Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 0 works
  8. 8 Family and Disability Support Research Clinical Psychology 0 works
  9. 9 Resilience and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 0 works
  10. 10 Breastfeeding Practices and Influences Epidemiology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available31.3%not open68.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors5.7%domestic only94.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Charles Stewart Mott Foundation's research output changed?

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Flint

All research institutions in Flint

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.