Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment is a research topic within Cognitive Neuroscience. Science Explorer counts 26k research works in it since 1950. 30.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the neuroscience and psychology of moral judgment, with a focus on the role of disgust, emotion, and disease avoidance in ethical decision-making. It delves into the interplay between intuition and reasoning, the impact of intentional actions, and the evolutionary origins of moral sentiments.

  • Moral Judgment
  • Disgust
  • Neuroscience
  • Emotion
  • Ethics
  • Social Intuition
  • Disease Avoidance
  • Utilitarianism
  • Psychology
  • Evolution
Research works
26k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
7.8k
per year above
Top-10% rate
30.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+46%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1.7k and 537 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.7k works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 537 works
  3. 3 Germany 474 works
  4. 4 China 446 works
  5. 5 Canada 236 works
  6. 6 Netherlands 228 works
  7. 7 Italy 226 works
  8. 8 Australia 199 works
  9. 9 France 154 works
  10. 10 Japan 142 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 39.2%United Kingdom: 12.3%Germany: 10.9%China: 10.3%6 others listed: 27.3%39%largest
United States1,704 · 39.2%United Kingdom537 · 12.3%Germany474 · 10.9%China446 · 10.3%6 others listed1,185 · 27.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Toronto publishes the most Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment research, followed by University of Oxford and Yale University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of TorontoCanada 35 works
  2. 2 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 35 works
  3. 3 Yale UniversityUnited States 28 works
  4. 4 Utrecht UniversityNetherlands 26 works
  5. 5 University of ChicagoUnited States 25 works
  6. 6 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 25 works
  7. 7 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenGermany 25 works
  8. 8 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 24 works
  9. 9 Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamNetherlands 22 works
  10. 10 University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 21 works

Who are the leading researchers in Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment include Zhiyuan Liu, John T. Cacioppo and Roy F. Baumeister.

  1. 1 Zhiyuan Liu China 3.7k citations
  2. 2 John T. Cacioppo United States 3.7k citations
  3. 3 Roy F. Baumeister United States 3.6k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment research done?

The largest centres of Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Beijing (China), New York (United States) and Toronto (Canada).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 114 works
  2. 2 Beijing China 93 works
  3. 3 New York United States 78 works
  4. 4 Toronto Canada 61 works
  5. 5 Paris France 55 works
  6. 6 Tokyo Japan 53 works
  7. 7 Amsterdam Netherlands 52 works
  8. 8 Oxford United Kingdom 48 works
  9. 9 Warsaw Poland 46 works
  10. 10 Munich Germany 45 works
See Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment on the map

Where is the best place to study Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment?

Among universities, judged by research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and University of Kent score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 38%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: 22, 40.0%University of Amsterdam: 21, 48.7%University of Kent: 14, 43.6%University of Oxford: 35, 36.3%Utrecht University: 26, 27.3%University of Würzburg: 14, 34.9%Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz: 8, 51.5%London School of Economics and Political Science: 13, 37.5%University of Vienna: 19, 31.7%University of Zurich: 21, 28.5%University of Amster…University of KentVrije Universiteit A…University of Oxford
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamNetherlands 76.340.0%10.0×22 +94.4%
2 University of AmsterdamNetherlands 69.448.7%6.9×21 +50.6%
3 University of KentUnited Kingdom 66.943.6%16.6×14 +16.3%
4 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 63.236.3%4.8×35 +56.2%
5 Utrecht UniversityNetherlands 62.127.3%8.5×26 +31.5%
6 University of WürzburgGermany 60.734.9%11.2×14 +15.9%
7 Johannes Gutenberg University MainzGermany 60.151.5%4.8×8 +256.3%
8 London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom 59.937.5%9.3×13 +27.6%
9 University of ViennaAustria 59.531.7%6.7×19 +103.6%
10 University of ZurichSwitzerland 58.928.5%6.9×21 +69.9%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 46% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2022. The fastest-growing topics are Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.