Clinical Practice Research Datalink
- Research works
- 95 ▲ 30% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.3k 35.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 34.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 75% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Clinical Practice Research Datalink is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, 4.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 4.3×
- Decision Sciences 3.3×
- Medicine 3.0×
- Health Professions 1.6×
- Psychology 1.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.1×
- Social Sciences 0.9×
- Computer Science 0.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.6×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Clinical Practice Research Datalink?
Ranked on the composite score, Rachael Williams lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
- 1 Rachael Williams United Kingdom · #1,309,421 worldwide 17 citations · 32 works
Which keywords describe research at Clinical Practice Research Datalink?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Big Data, Data Integration, Primary Care, Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, Epidemiology, Quality of Life and Data Mining.
- Continuity of Care
- Signal Detection
- Pharmacovigilance
- Health Information Exchange
- Mortality Risk
- Medication Errors
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Health Equity
- Data Quality
- Quality Assessment
- Electronic Health Records
- Multimorbidity
- Global Burden
- Quality Improvement
- Public Health
- Data Mining
- Machine Learning
- Data Cleaning
- Quality of Life
- Big Data
- Epidemiology
- Data Integration
- Primary Care
- Record Linkage
- Risk Factors
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Clinical Guidelines
- Health Services
- Chronic Conditions
- Chronic Disease Management
- Health Disparities
- Clinical Coding
- Guidelines
- ICD-10
- Adverse Drug Reactions
- Glycemic Control
- Clinical Decision Support Systems
- Patient Outcomes
- Respiratory
- Evidence-Based Practice
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology9▲ 2.4×30 topics
- Big Data8▲ 16×6 topics
- Data Integration6▲ 26×2 topics
- Quality of Life6▲ 4.6×12 topics
- Primary Care6▲ 14×9 topics
- Data Cleaning6▲ 248×1 topic
- Record Linkage6▲ 248×1 topic
- Machine Learning5▲ 2.6×10 topics
- Risk Factors5▲ 4.8×17 topics
- Data Mining5▲ 11×5 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines4▲ 7.7×10 topics
- Public Health4▲ 2.9×12 topics
- Clinical Guidelines4▲ 12×7 topics
- Quality Improvement3▲ 15×6 topics
- Health Services3▲ 43×2 topics
- Global Burden3▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Chronic Conditions3▲ 51×1 topic
- Multimorbidity3▲ 88×1 topic
- Chronic Disease Management2▲ 18×3 topics
- Electronic Health Records2▲ 43×3 topics
- Health Disparities2▲ 13×4 topics
- Quality Assessment2▲ 13×2 topics
- Clinical Coding2▲ 230×1 topic
- Data Quality2▲ 68×2 topics
- Guidelines2▲ 5.0×7 topics
- Health Equity2▲ 13×4 topics
- ICD-102▲ 230×1 topic
- Type 2 Diabetes2▲ 13×3 topics
- Adverse Drug Reactions2▲ 33×2 topics
- Medication Errors2▲ 45×2 topics
- Glycemic Control2▲ 15×3 topics
- Mortality Risk2▲ 9.6×5 topics
- Clinical Decision Support Systems2▲ 71×1 topic
- Health Information Exchange2▲ 71×1 topic
- Patient Outcomes2▲ 30×2 topics
- Pharmacovigilance2▲ 152×1 topic
- Respiratory2▲ 19×2 topics
- Signal Detection2▲ 152×1 topic
- Evidence-Based Practice2▲ 11×3 topics
- Continuity of Care2▲ 28×1 topic
Which research topics does Clinical Practice Research Datalink publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Pregnancy and Medication Impact, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum and Maternal and fetal healthcare.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Pregnancy and Medication Impact Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 2 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 1 works
- 3 Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
- 4 Maternal and fetal healthcare Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
- 5 Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0 works
- 6 Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 Neurology 0 works
- 7 Medical Coding and Health Information Health Information Management 0 works
- 8 Gender Politics and Representation Gender Studies 0 works
- 9 Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
- 10 Gender, Education, and Development Issues Education 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Clinical Practice Research Datalink's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 30% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in London
- University College London
- Imperial College London
- King's College London
- Queen Mary University of London
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- University of London
- Brunel University of London
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.