Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging is a research topic within Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Science Explorer counts 23k research works in it since 1950. 16.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the concept of the exposome, which encompasses the totality of environmental exposures throughout a person's life, including external and internal factors, and their biological responses. The papers cover topics such as environmental epidemiology, omics-based biomarkers, cohort studies, and the impact of environmental factors on health and disease risks.
- Exposome
- Environmental Exposure
- Epidemiology
- Health
- Omics
- Biomarkers
- Cohort Study
- Public Health
- Genetics
- Disease Risk
- Research works
- 23k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 3.7k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 16.1% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +66% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (2.6k and 925 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 2.6k works
- 2 China 925 works
- 3 United Kingdom 549 works
- 4 Canada 246 works
- 5 France 219 works
- 6 Germany 208 works
- 7 Italy 205 works
- 8 India 181 works
- 9 Netherlands 168 works
- 10 Australia 159 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill publishes the most Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging research, followed by Harvard University and Johns Hopkins University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 84 works
- 2 Harvard UniversityUnited States 64 works
- 3 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 46 works
- 4 University of Southern CaliforniaUnited States 39 works
- 5 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 39 works
- 6 Columbia UniversityUnited States 36 works
- 7 University of MichiganUnited States 35 works
- 8 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States 34 works
- 9 Emory UniversityUnited States 34 works
- 10 Peking UniversityChina 34 works
Who are the leading researchers in Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging include John P. A. Ioannidis, Dan J. Stein and Mika Kivimäki.
- 1 John P. A. Ioannidis United States 8k citations
- 2 Dan J. Stein South Africa 7.7k citations
- 3 Mika Kivimäki United Kingdom 6.7k citations
- 4 Josep María Haro Spain 6.4k citations
- 5 Emelia J. Benjamin United States 6k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging research done?
The largest centres of Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom), New York (United States) and Boston (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Chapel Hill, Bethesda and Bristol.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 Beijing China 194 works
- 2 London United Kingdom 191 works
- 3 New York United States 147 works
- 4 Boston United States 105 works
- 5 Chapel Hill United States 87 works
- 6 Paris France 85 works
- 7 Baltimore United States 85 works
- 8 Cambridge United States 81 works
- 9 Shanghai China 78 works
- 10 Los Angeles United States 72 works
Where it is the local speciality
- Chapel HillUS · 87.4 works7.3×
- BethesdaUS · 59.4 works7.1×
- BristolGB · 39.6 works6.4×
- DurhamUS · 50.2 works6.1×
- BaltimoreUS · 85.2 works5.2×
- St LouisUS · 39.9 works5.1×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging?
Among universities, judged by research, Harvard University, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and University of Southern California score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvard UniversityUnited States | 65.7 | 22.1% | 7.6× | 64 | +103.1% |
| 2 | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States | 65.5 | 16.0% | 10.6× | 34 | +181.6% |
| 3 | University of Southern CaliforniaUnited States | 61.6 | 19.8% | 7.9× | 39 | +158.3% |
| 4 | University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States | 57.0 | 4.0% | 7.3× | 84 | +205.6% |
| 5 | Karolinska InstitutetSweden | 54.1 | 15.0% | 9.4× | 28 | -7.6% |
| 6 | University of BristolUnited Kingdom | 53.7 | 18.0% | 8.4× | 30 | +36.6% |
| 7 | University College LondonUnited Kingdom | 53.5 | 20.6% | 4.2× | 39 | +123.6% |
| 8 | King's College LondonUnited Kingdom | 53.1 | 17.0% | 6.0× | 30 | +127.6% |
| 9 | Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States | 52.4 | 13.9% | 6.3× | 46 | +107.7% |
| 10 | Columbia UniversityUnited States | 50.6 | 18.0% | 6.6× | 36 | +56.3% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 66% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.