- Research works
- 115 ▼ 61% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 420 3.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 21.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 26% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Democracy X is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which keywords describe research at Democracy X?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Pedagogy, Qualitative Research, Tacit Knowledge, Social Sciences, Ethical Guidelines, Embodiment and Dementia Care.
- Technology Integration
- Blended Learning
- Private R&D
- Cognitive Engagement
- SMEs
- Co-Creation
- Online Learning
- European Legal Systems
- Renewable Energy
- Public Health
- Phenomenology
- Family Dynamics
- Social Media
- Communication
- Methodology
- Learning
- Dementia Care
- Ethical Guidelines
- Tacit Knowledge
- Pedagogy
- Education
- Qualitative Research
- Social Sciences
- Embodiment
- Interactional Expertise
- Discourse Analysis
- Ethics
- Innovation
- Healthcare
- Innovation Policy
- Human Rights
- Democracy
- E-Learning
- Judicial Review
- User Engagement
- Open Innovation
- User-Centric Design
- Informal Learning
- R&D Subsidies
- Distance Education
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education21▲ 14×10 topics
- Pedagogy19▲ 47×5 topics
- Qualitative Research18▲ 27×3 topics
- Tacit Knowledge18▲ 262×3 topics
- Social Sciences18▲ 95×3 topics
- Ethical Guidelines17▲ 276×2 topics
- Embodiment17▲ 86×2 topics
- Dementia Care17▲ 838×1 topic
- Interactional Expertise17▲ 889×1 topic
- Learning15▲ 65×5 topics
- Discourse Analysis14▲ 51×1 topic
- Methodology14▲ 228×1 topic
- Ethics6▲ 10×4 topics
- Communication5▲ 16×3 topics
- Innovation4▲ 4.3×11 topics
- Social Media4▲ 4.9×10 topics
- Healthcare4▲ 5.4×2 topics
- Family Dynamics4▲ 48×1 topic
- Innovation Policy4▲ 46×4 topics
- Phenomenology4▲ 30×1 topic
- Human Rights4▲ 3.9×3 topics
- Public Health4▲ 2.4×8 topics
- Democracy4▲ 8.4×2 topics
- Renewable Energy4▲ 3.1×6 topics
- E-Learning3▲ 5.1×6 topics
- European Legal Systems3▲ 66×1 topic
- Judicial Review3▲ 27×1 topic
- Online Learning3▲ 6.3×2 topics
- User Engagement3▲ 62×2 topics
- Co-Creation3▲ 82×2 topics
- Open Innovation3▲ 51×1 topic
- SMEs3▲ 16×2 topics
- User-Centric Design3▲ 143×1 topic
- Cognitive Engagement3▲ 30×2 topics
- Informal Learning3▲ 22×4 topics
- Private R&D3▲ 133×1 topic
- R&D Subsidies3▲ 133×1 topic
- Blended Learning2▲ 21×1 topic
- Distance Education2▲ 14×1 topic
- Technology Integration2▲ 9.2×4 topics
Which research topics does Democracy X publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Critical Theory and Philosophy, Veterinary Practice and Education Studies, Impulse Buying and Technology Impacts and Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Critical Theory and Philosophy Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 2 Veterinary Practice and Education Studies Speech and Hearing 0 works
- 3 Impulse Buying and Technology Impacts Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 4 Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 5 Political Philosophy and Ethics Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 6 Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development Management of Technology and Innovation 0 works
- 7 Child Development and Digital Technology Education 0 works
- 8 Interprofessional Education and Collaboration General Health Professions 0 works
- 9 Social and Behavioral Studies Health 0 works
- 10 Cultural and Artistic Studies Cultural Studies 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Democracy X's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 61% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Copenhagen
- University of Copenhagen
- Rigshospitalet
- Copenhagen Business School
- Copenhagen University Hospital
- Gentofte Hospital
- Bispebjerg Hospital
- Statens Serum Institut
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.