E Ink (South Korea)
In research, E Ink (South Korea) stands highest in Social Sciences (#4,938 of 10,521 worldwide), Social Sciences (#3,674 of 6,365 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#8,999 of 11,982 worldwide), 2022–2025.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #14,640 of 28,054 · #11,547 all time
- Rank in South Korea
- #265 of 417
- Research works
- 3.1k ▲ 39% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 24k 7.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 38% world 28%
What is E Ink (South Korea) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #4,938 of 10,521 | 17.0% | 246 | #4853 | |
| Social SciencesField | #3,674 of 6,365 | 20.7% | 140 | #4223 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #8,999 of 11,982 | 7.6% | 77 | #5157 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #11,795 of 12,888 | 6.8% | 76 | #10301 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where E Ink (South Korea) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#4,853 #4,938
- Social Sciences#4,223 #3,674
- Health Sciences#5,157 #8,999
- Physical Sciences#10,301 #11,795
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 4.1×
- Social Sciences 2.6×
- Health Professions 2.0×
- Psychology 1.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.5×
- Energy 0.7×
- Medicine 0.7×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Neuroscience 0.6×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Nursing 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Veterinary 0.4×
- Decision Sciences 0.3×
- Chemical Engineering 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
- Dentistry 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at E Ink (South Korea)?
Ranked on the composite score, G. Jäschke, Karen Cox and Yvonne Rainer lead among researchers whose main affiliation is E Ink (South Korea).
- 1 G. Jäschke South Korea · #218,475 worldwide 36 citations · 40 works
- 2 Karen Cox South Korea · #220,241 worldwide 128 citations · 20 works
- 3 Yvonne Rainer South Korea · #536,690 worldwide 17 citations · 19 works
- 4 Jean Racine South Korea · #623,185 worldwide 0 citations · 19 works
- 5 Karl Borchardt South Korea · #627,346 worldwide 1 citations · 21 works
- 6 Joep Hubben South Korea · #694,482 worldwide 3 citations · 38 works
- 7 Colin van der Heiden South Korea · #829,581 worldwide 42 citations · 33 works
- 8 Constance Dolman South Korea · #847,385 worldwide 2 citations · 18 works
- 9 Berry Middel South Korea · #898,516 worldwide 30 citations · 30 works
- 10 CJSDW Editorial Staff South Korea · #1,048,080 worldwide 0 citations · 35 works
Which keywords describe research at E Ink (South Korea)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, Governance, Education, Bildungsungleichheit, Ethnografisches Schreiben, Learning, E-Learning and Teaching.
- Gender Dynamics
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Teaching Methods
- Youth Engagement
- Teacher Development
- Inclusion
- Nationalism
- Cultural Studies
- Competence
- Community Empowerment
- Didactics
- Gender
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Identity
- Learning
- E-Learning
- Ethnografisches Schreiben
- Sustainable Development
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
- Education
- Governance
- Bildungsungleichheit
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Digital Learning
- Teaching
- Cultural Heritage
- Curriculum
- Teacher Education
- Professional Development
- Financial Performance
- Inclusive Education
- Literature
- Health Promotion
- Migration
- Physical Education
- Special Education
- Language Learning
- Innovation Management
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education27▲ 3.8×42 topics
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse24▲ 142×2 topics
- Governance21▲ 15×9 topics
- Sustainable Development18▲ 2.7×30 topics
- Bildungsungleichheit16▲ 133×1 topic
- Ethnografisches Schreiben16▲ 133×1 topic
- Globalization16▲ 1.95×49 topics
- E-Learning16▲ 3.8×16 topics
- Sustainability14▲ 1.42×38 topics
- Learning13▲ 11×8 topics
- Digital Learning12▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Identity11▲ 3.6×34 topics
- Teaching11▲ 21×6 topics
- Human Rights10▲ 2.3×34 topics
- Cultural Heritage10▲ 4.2×16 topics
- Innovation10▲ 2.2×17 topics
- Curriculum10▲ 24×5 topics
- Gender9▲ 4.1×23 topics
- Teacher Education9▲ 17×5 topics
- Didactics9▲ 21×2 topics
- Professional Development9▲ 11×10 topics
- Community Empowerment9▲ 2.8×9 topics
- Financial Performance8▲ 3.4×4 topics
- Competence8▲ 166×1 topic
- Inclusive Education8▲ 5.3×10 topics
- Cultural Studies8▲ 4.7×13 topics
- Literature7▲ 3.2×17 topics
- Nationalism7▲ 3.7×15 topics
- Health Promotion7▲ 5.2×5 topics
- Inclusion7▲ 11×8 topics
- Migration7▲ 4.9×16 topics
- Teacher Development7▲ 26×3 topics
- Physical Education6▲ 12×4 topics
- Youth Engagement6▲ 6.1×3 topics
- Special Education6▲ 23×3 topics
- Teaching Methods6▲ 9.3×4 topics
- Language Learning5▲ 17×4 topics
- Small and Medium Enterprises5▲ 7.0×3 topics
- Innovation Management5▲ 7.2×2 topics
- Gender Dynamics5▲ 11×4 topics
Which research topics does E Ink (South Korea) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Sociology and Education Studies, Education Methods and Technologies, Regional Development and Management Studies and Physical Education and Pedagogy.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Sociology and Education Studies Sociology and Political Science 16 works
- 2 Education Methods and Technologies Education 8 works
- 3 Regional Development and Management Studies Economics and Econometrics 4 works
- 4 Physical Education and Pedagogy Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 4 works
- 5 Public Health and Nutrition Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 4 works
- 6 Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion Education 3 works
- 7 Linguistic Education and Pedagogy Language and Linguistics 3 works
- 8 Educational Methods and Media Use Information Systems 3 works
- 9 SMEs Development and Digital Marketing Demography 3 works
- 10 Linguistic research and analysis Language and Linguistics 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has E Ink (South Korea)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 39% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Seoul
- Seoul National University
- Yonsei University
- Korea University
- Sungkyunkwan University
- Hanyang University
- Kyung Hee University
- Chung-Ang University
- Samsung (South Korea)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.