Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Lexington · United States

George C Marshall Foundation

Research works
12
▼ 100% vs 2018-21
Citations
46
3.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
6%
world 40%
International
4%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: George C Marshall Foundation is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does George C Marshall Foundation work in?

In all years, 64% of research at George C Marshall Foundation is in Social Sciences, 25% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (48%), Environmental Science (14%), Computer Science (8%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 8 fractional works · 64.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 48.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 3 fractional works · 25.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 2 fractional works · 15.5% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 7.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 4.2% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 3.4% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 25.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 14.2% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 9.9% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 4.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 8.5% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 5.7% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 6.7% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 3.3% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 3.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workALL ITS WORKGeorge C MarshallFoundation12fractional works, all years
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences25%Health Sciences4%Social Sciences64%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences648.0%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance17.1%
    3. Arts and Humanities03.4%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting02.8%
    5. Psychology02.8%
    1. Environmental Science214.2%
    2. Computer Science18.5%
    3. Engineering02.8%
    1. Immunology and Microbiology03.3%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences02.8%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.6%
    1. Medicine03.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at George C Marshall Foundation?

Ranked on the quality score, Mame Warren and Larry I. Bland lead among researchers whose main affiliation is George C Marshall Foundation.

  1. 1 Mame Warren United States · #3,969,382 worldwide 11 citations · 15 works
  2. 2 Larry I. Bland United States · #4,470,758 worldwide 46 citations · 32 works
All ranked researchers at George C Marshall Foundation

What are the most cited papers from George C Marshall Foundation?

The most cited paper from George C Marshall Foundation is "The evolution and socioecology of dominance in primate groups: A theoretical formulation, classification and assessment" (Clara B. Jones, 1981), with 11 citations. Next come "Our Country: Northern Evangelicals and the Union during the Civil War Era" (4) and "A Time for Giants: Politics of the American High Command in World War II" (3).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The evolution and socioecology of dominance in primate groups: A theoretical formulation, classification and assessment Clara B. Jones · Primates 1981 11
2 Our Country: Northern Evangelicals and the Union during the Civil War Era David W. Hein · Journal of American History 11 Nov 2019 4
3 A Time for Giants: Politics of the American High Command in World War II Larry I. Bland, D. Clayton James, Anne Sharp Wells · Journal of American History Dec 1988 3
4 Spanning the Century: The Life of W. Averell Harriman, 1891-1986. Larry I. Bland, Rudy Abramson · Journal of American History Sep 1993 2
5 WILLIAM FREDERICK FRIEDMAN: A PICTORIAL ESSAY Alison L. Oswald · Cryptologia Jul 1992 1
All 11 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does George C Marshall Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Library Science and Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence Applications and Research Data Management Practices.

  1. 1 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 0 works
  2. 2 Artificial Intelligence Applications Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  3. 3 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available5.9%not open94.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors4.2%domestic only95.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has George C Marshall Foundation's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 100% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is George C Marshall Foundation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000048% in 2018.

0.00020%0.00040%George C Marshall Foundation0.000022% in 20191980199020002010

Fractional works of George C Marshall Foundation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Lexington

All research institutions in Lexington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about George C Marshall Foundation. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.