George C Marshall Foundation
- Research works
- 12 ▼ 40% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 46 3.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 6% world 28%
Not ranked overall: George C Marshall Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which research topics does George C Marshall Foundation publish most on?
By volume: Vietnamese History and Culture Studies, American Environmental and Regional History, Canadian Identity and History and Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Vietnamese History and Culture Studies Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 2 American Environmental and Regional History Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
- 3 Canadian Identity and History Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 4 Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
- 5 American Constitutional Law and Politics Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 6 Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 7 Island Studies and Pacific Affairs Demography 0 works
- 8 Military History and Strategy Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 9 Primate Behavior and Ecology Social Psychology 0 works
- 10 World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact Political Science and International Relations 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has George C Marshall Foundation's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 40% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Lexington
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.