Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Government institution · Shepparton · Australia

Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority

gbcma.vic.gov.auROR OpenAlex
Research works
8
▲ 19% vs 2018-21
Citations
191
25.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
40%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%
Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority

Not ranked overall: Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority work in?

In all years, 37% of research at Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority is in Physical Sciences, 35% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (27%), Health Professions (22%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (18%).

Physical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 37.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 27.4% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 8.5% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 6.6% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 4.9% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workOcean Engineering: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 34.5% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 21.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 11.9% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 4.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 9.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 20.5% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 18.0% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 6.6% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 7.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workALL ITS WORKGoulburn BrokenCatchment…8fractional works, all years
Life Sciences20%Physical Sciences37%Health Sciences35%Social Sciences8%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science227.4%
    2. Engineering18.4%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences01.4%
    1. Health Professions221.9%
    2. Medicine19.3%
    3. Nursing02.2%
    4. Veterinary01.0%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences118.0%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.5%
    1. Social Sciences04.7%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance02.1%
    3. Psychology00.9%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 4.77× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Engineering: 0.74× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 6.54× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 4.40× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.32× its world share, 0 worksMedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.81× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 0.96× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 6.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Environmental Science6.54×1 works
  2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences4.77×0 works
  3. Health Professions4.40×0 works
  4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.81×0 works
  5. Social Sciences0.96×0 works
  6. Engineering0.74×0 works
  7. Medicine0.32×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority?

The most cited paper from Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority is "Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment" (Alison J. King, Keith A. Ward, Deborah L. O’Connor et al., 2009), with 202 citations. Next come "Alterations in flood frequency increase exotic and native species richness of understorey vegetation in a temperate floodplain eucalypt forest" (57) and "The Value of Rural Isolated Practice Endorsed Registered Nurses in a Small Rural Health Service" (51).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment Alison J. King, Keith A. Ward, Deborah L. O’Connor et al. · Freshwater Biology 2 Mar 2009 202
2 Alterations in flood frequency increase exotic and native species richness of understorey vegetation in a temperate floodplain eucalypt forest Kate Stokes, Keith A. Ward, Matthew J. Colloff · Plant Ecology 11 Sep 2010 57
3 The Value of Rural Isolated Practice Endorsed Registered Nurses in a Small Rural Health Service Fiona Currie, Genevieve Nielsen, Kaye Elizabeth Ervin et al. · Research in Health Science Open access 30 May 2016 51
4 Ecology and conservation of grassy wetlands dominated by spiny mud grass Pseudoraphis spinescens in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia Matthew J. Colloff, Keith A. Ward, Jane Roberts · Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13 Sep 2013 33
5 Epidemiology of women???s recreational ice hockey injuries Donna M Dryden, Louis Hugo Francescutti, Brian Hunter Rowe et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Aug 2000 33
All 27 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Water resources management and optimization, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, Healthcare innovation and challenges and Global Health Workforce Issues.

Water resources manageme…0Water resources management and optimization: 0 fractional worksWater-Energy-Food Nexus …0Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies: 0 fractional worksHealthcare innovation an…0Healthcare innovation and challenges: 0 fractional worksGlobal Health Workforce …0Global Health Workforce Issues: 0 fractional worksProbiotics and Fermented Foods: 0 fractional worksMeat and Animal Product Quality: 0 fractional worksFish Ecology and Managem…0Fish Ecology and Management Studies: 0 fractional worksMarine and fisheries research: 0 fractional worksCrustacean biology and ecology: 0 fractional worksRural development and su…0Rural development and sustainability: 0 fractional works
Ocean EngineeringWater Science and TechnologyEducationEmergency Medical Services6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Water resources management and optimization Ocean Engineering 0 works
  2. 2 Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies Water Science and Technology 0 works
  3. 3 Healthcare innovation and challenges Education 0 works
  4. 4 Global Health Workforce Issues Emergency Medical Services 0 works
  5. 5 Probiotics and Fermented Foods Food Science 0 works
  6. 6 Meat and Animal Product Quality Animal Science and Zoology 0 works
  7. 7 Fish Ecology and Management Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works
  8. 8 Marine and fisheries research Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  9. 9 Crustacean biology and ecology Ecology 0 works
  10. 10 Rural development and sustainability General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available40.4%not open59.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.1%domestic only74.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 19% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000016% in 2023.

0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority0.0000011% in 2024200020102020

Fractional works of Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Shepparton

All research institutions in Shepparton

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.