Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

Historic Charleston Foundation

Research works
3
fractional, all time
Citations
17
5.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
1.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
11%
world 40%
International
7%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Historic Charleston Foundation is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Historic Charleston Foundation work in?

In all years, 62% of research at Historic Charleston Foundation is in Social Sciences, 32% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (35%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (29%), Arts and Humanities (24%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences32%Health Sciences6%Social Sciences62%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 6 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences135.3%
    2. Arts and Humanities123.5%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance02.9%
    1. Earth and Planetary Sciences129.4%
    2. Engineering02.9%
    1. Medicine05.9%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

    What are the most cited papers from Historic Charleston Foundation?

    The most cited paper from Historic Charleston Foundation is "“After the Chinese taste”: Chinese export porcelain and chinoiserie design in eighteen-century Charleston" (Robert A. Leath, 1999), with 12 citations. Next come "Backcountry and lowcountry: Perspectives on charleston in the context of trans-Atlantic culture, 1700–1850" (4) and "Hurricane Hugo and Historic Charleston: Damage Recordation and Retrieval" (0).

    All 3 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

    Which research topics does Historic Charleston Foundation publish most on?

    By volume: Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies, Fashion and Cultural Textiles and Literature: history, themes, analysis.

    1. 1 Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research Atmospheric Science 1 works
    2. 2 Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies Anthropology 0 works
    3. 3 Fashion and Cultural Textiles Museology 0 works
    4. 4 Literature: history, themes, analysis Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
    5. 5 Australian History and Society Sociology and Political Science 0 works
    6. 6 Canadian Identity and History Sociology and Political Science 0 works
    7. 7 Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies Economics and Econometrics 0 works
    8. 8 History of Medical Practice Neurology 0 works
    9. 9 Human auditory perception and evaluation Aerospace Engineering 0 works
    10. 10 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 0 works

    How open and international is its research?

    Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

    openly available11.1%not open88.9%

    World: 40% of research is openly available.

    with international co-authors7.4%domestic only92.6%

    World: 18% is written across borders.

    How has Historic Charleston Foundation's research output changed?

    20002005

    Other research institutions in Charleston

    All research institutions in Charleston

    Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or share a note about Historic Charleston Foundation. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.