Human auditory perception and evaluation
Human auditory perception and evaluation is a research topic within Aerospace Engineering. Science Explorer counts 27k research works in it since 1950. 6.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the perception and physiological response to hypersonic and ultrasonic stimuli, including their effects on brain activity, mental workload, nasal temperature, and bone-conducted hearing. It also investigates the use of facial skin thermography and ultrasound activation in understanding these phenomena.
- Hypersonic Effect
- Ultrasonic Perception
- Brain Activity
- Mental Workload
- Nasal Temperature
- Ultrasound Activation
- Bone-Conducted Hearing
- Facial Skin Thermogram
- High-Frequency Sounds
- Physiological Evaluation
- Research works
- 27k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.8k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 6.9% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +10% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Human auditory perception and evaluation research?
By volume, the United States and Germany publish the most (784 and 293 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 784 works
- 2 Germany 293 works
- 3 United Kingdom 224 works
- 4 Japan 224 works
- 5 India 198 works
- 6 China 162 works
- 7 Canada 92 works
- 8 Italy 84 works
- 9 France 83 works
- 10 Indonesia 69 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Human auditory perception and evaluation research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Health & Medical Publishing Group publishes the most Human auditory perception and evaluation research, followed by Human Growth Foundation and Sapienza University of Rome.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Health & Medical Publishing Group South Africa 31 works
- 2 Human Growth Foundation United States 20 works
- 3 Sapienza University of Rome Italy 20 works
- 4 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers United States 20 works
- 5 Bergmann und Partner Rechtsanwälte Germany 16 works
- 6 University of Pittsburgh United States 15 works
- 7 University of St Andrews United Kingdom 15 works
- 8 Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom 12 works
- 9 University of Vienna Austria 12 works
- 10 Rosemont College United States 12 works
Who are the leading researchers in Human auditory perception and evaluation?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Human auditory perception and evaluation include Roger Chou, R. W. L. Jones and Giuseppe Remuzzi.
- 1 Roger Chou 14k citations
- 2 R. W. L. Jones 8.3k citations
- 3 Giuseppe Remuzzi 8.1k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Human auditory perception and evaluation research done?
The largest centres of Human auditory perception and evaluation research in 2022–2025 are Tokyo (Japan), New York (United States), London (United Kingdom) and Beijing (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Piscataway and Cape Town.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- PiscatawayUS · 20.5 works120×
- Cape TownZA · 32.9 works28×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Human auditory perception and evaluation than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Human auditory perception and evaluation?
Among universities, judged by research, Sapienza University of Rome, University of St Andrews and University of Vienna score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sapienza University of Rome Italy | 60.7 | 0.6% | 6.3× | 20 | +110.6% |
| 2 | University of St Andrews United Kingdom | 57.5 | 0.0% | 24.7× | 15 | +206.1% |
| 3 | University of Vienna Austria | 54.5 | 0.3% | 8.9× | 12 | +76.0% |
| 4 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers United States | 45.3 | 0.0% | 239.9× | 20 | -12.9% |
| 5 | University of Pittsburgh United States | 43.1 | 0.4% | 7.2× | 15 | -43.6% |
| 6 | University of Florida United States | 41.8 | 0.9% | 3.1× | 9 | +20.2% |
| 7 | Rosemont College United States | 40.6 | 0.0% | 1483.9× | 12 | — |
| 8 | Shobhit University India | 35.5 | 0.0% | 71.3× | 10 | — |
| 9 | University of Rochester United States | 34.4 | 0.0% | 12.0× | 10 | -16.1% |
| 10 | Universitas Dharmawangsa Indonesia | 31.0 | 0.0% | 66.4× | 8 | — |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Human auditory perception and evaluation research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 10% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Human auditory perception and evaluation.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.