Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Topic · Aerospace Engineering

Human auditory perception and evaluation

Human auditory perception and evaluation is a research topic within Aerospace Engineering. Science Explorer counts 27k research works in it since 1950. 10.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the perception and physiological response to hypersonic and ultrasonic stimuli, including their effects on brain activity, mental workload, nasal temperature, and bone-conducted hearing. It also investigates the use of facial skin thermography and ultrasound activation in understanding these phenomena.

  • Hypersonic Effect
  • Ultrasonic Perception
  • Brain Activity
  • Mental Workload
  • Nasal Temperature
  • Ultrasound Activation
  • Bone-Conducted Hearing
  • Facial Skin Thermogram
  • High-Frequency Sounds
  • Physiological Evaluation
Research works
27k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
10.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
-3%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
United States
36% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Human auditory perception and evaluation

Which countries lead Human auditory perception and evaluation research?

By volume, the United States and Germany publish the most (929 and 354 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States 929 works
  2. 2 Germany 354 works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 261 works
  4. 4 Japan 252 works
  5. 5 India 232 works
  6. 6 China 194 works
  7. 7 Canada 105 works
  8. 8 Italy 100 works
  9. 9 France 94 works
  10. 10 Indonesia 72 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 35.8%Germany: 13.7%United Kingdom: 10.1%Japan: 9.7%6 others listed: 30.7%36%largest
United States929 · 35.8%Germany354 · 13.7%United Kingdom261 · 10.1%Japan252 · 9.7%6 others listed796 · 30.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Human auditory perception and evaluation research?

By volume in 2022-now, Human Growth Foundation publishes the most Human auditory perception and evaluation research, followed by Health & Medical Publishing Group and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 Human Growth FoundationUnited States 46 works
  2. 2 Health & Medical Publishing GroupSouth Africa 31 works
  3. 3 Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFrance 24 works
  4. 4 Sapienza University of RomeItaly 20 works
  5. 5 Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersUnited States 20 works
  6. 6 Bergmann und Partner RechtsanwälteGermany 18 works
  7. 7 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 17 works
  8. 8 University of PittsburghUnited States 16 works
  9. 9 University of St AndrewsUnited Kingdom 15 works
  10. 10 Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation TrustUnited Kingdom 14 works

Who are the leading researchers in Human auditory perception and evaluation?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Human auditory perception and evaluation include David Moher, Jun Wang and Giuseppe Remuzzi.

  1. 1 David Moher Canada 898k citations
  2. 2 Jun Wang China 340k citations
  3. 3 Giuseppe Remuzzi Italy 328k citations
  4. 4 Gregory Y.H. Lip United Kingdom 311k citations
  5. 5 Dan J. Stein South Africa 306k citations
  6. 6 Peter Jüni Switzerland 303k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Human auditory perception and evaluation?

The most cited paper in Human auditory perception and evaluation is "AIP Conference Proceedings" (T Arturo Fernández, 2006), with 5,228 citations. Next come "Personal communication" (2,888) and "Preface to the Second Edition" (2,059).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 AIP Conference Proceedings T Arturo Fernández · conference Conference paper Dec 2006 5,228
2 Personal communication Glen W. Davidson, Danell Crase · Death Studies 1989 2,888
3 Preface to the Second Edition Jes Olesen · Cephalalgia Open access May 2004 2,059
4 Transportation journal West Madison Street · Transportation Research Aug 1967 1,099
5 AIP Conference Proceedings J. Montaño, J. Jesús Toscano, F. Ramírez–Zavaleta et al. · conference Conference paper Dec 2011 1,003
All 102 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Human auditory perception and evaluation research done?

The largest centres of Human auditory perception and evaluation research in 2022-now are New York (United States), Tokyo (Japan), London (United Kingdom) and Beijing (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Piscataway and Cape Town.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 New YorkUnited States 95 works
  2. 2 TokyoJapan 88 works
  3. 3 LondonUnited Kingdom 69 works
  4. 4 BeijingChina 55 works
  5. 5 ParisFrance 37 works
  6. 6 Washington D.C.United States 37 works
  7. 7 BerlinGermany 33 works
  8. 8 Cape TownSouth Africa 33 works
  9. 9 RomeItaly 31 works
  10. 10 MunichGermany 26 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. PiscatawayUS · 20.6 works100×
  2. Cape TownZA · 32.9 works24×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Human auditory perception and evaluation than the world average.

See Human auditory perception and evaluation on the map

Where is the best place to study Human auditory perception and evaluation?

Among universities, judged by research, Sapienza University of Rome, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and University of St Andrews score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 14.82%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Sapienza University …University of St And…University of Pittsb…Institute of Electri…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Sapienza University of RomeItaly 91.739.1%5.7×20 +906.2%
2Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersUnited States 55.95.4%233.6×20 +52.0%
3University of St AndrewsUnited Kingdom 53.69.5%24.2×15 +200.6%
4University of PittsburghUnited States 52.48.2%6.8×16 +274.5%
5University of TorontoCanada 49.134.6%1.5×9 +34.7%
6University of ViennaAustria 46.73.4%8.9×14 +336.6%
7University of MichiganUnited States 44.222.1%2.5×11 +10.7%
8Rosemont CollegeUnited States 42.79.5%1564.8×13 -
9Weatherford CollegeUnited States 38.19.2%3.1×12 +322.8%
10University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 37.47.2%3.0×11 +9.3%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Human auditory perception and evaluation, country by country

Is Human auditory perception and evaluation research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 3% lower than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2020.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Human auditory perception and evaluation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.014% in 2024.

still counting0.025%0.050%0.075%Human auditory perception and evaluation0.013% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Human auditory perception and evaluation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Human auditory perception and evaluation10.5% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Human auditory perception and evaluation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.