Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques
In research, Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,981 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Arts and Humanities — Arts and Humanities is 8.4× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #17,250 of 28,054 · #10,048 all time
- Rank in France
- #777 of 1,422
- Research works
- 1.4k ▼ 23% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 7.2k 5.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 15.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 32% world 28%
What is Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,981 of 10,521 | 16.8% | 78 | #2883 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Arts and Humanities takes 8.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Arts and HumanitiesField · 32.2 works8.4×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 8.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 8.4×
- Psychology 3.0×
- Neuroscience 3.0×
- Mathematics 2.0×
- Social Sciences 1.8×
- Health Professions 1.6×
- Decision Sciences 1.6×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.5×
- Veterinary 1.4×
- Chemical Engineering 1.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.0×
- Computer Science 1.0×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.5×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques?
Ranked on the composite score, Jean Gayon, Olivier Rey and Sylvie Allouche lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques.
- 1 Jean Gayon France · #110,299 worldwide 136 citations · 63 works
- 2 Olivier Rey France · #200,529 worldwide 33 citations · 46 works
- 3 Sylvie Allouche France · #277,750 worldwide 2 citations · 50 works
- 4 Tadaaki Kimoto France · #386,354 worldwide 1 citations · 40 works
- 5 Lucie Laplane France · #395,421 worldwide 55 citations · 32 works
- 6 Maël Montévil France · #409,578 worldwide 31 citations · 30 works
- 7 Marco Panza France · #419,508 worldwide 20 citations · 24 works
- 8 Michel Bourdeau France · #431,003 worldwide 5 citations · 33 works
- 9 Laurent Loison France · #487,991 worldwide 11 citations · 20 works
- 10 Fabrice Gzil France · #672,410 worldwide 1 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Philosophy of Science, Developmental Biology, Genetic Code, Evolutionary Synthesis, Mechanistic Explanation, History, Science and Ethics.
- Sociolinguistics
- Psychology
- Metaphysics
- Philosophy of Mind
- Cognitive Science
- Social Change
- Society
- Medicine
- Modal Logic
- Citizen Participation
- Perception
- Public Policy
- Sustainable Development
- Social Justice
- Colonialism
- Philosophy
- Ethics
- History
- Evolutionary Synthesis
- Developmental Biology
- Philosophy of Science
- Genetic Code
- Mechanistic Explanation
- Science
- Neuroscience
- Community Engagement
- Local Development
- Territorial Governance
- Culture
- Technology
- Truth
- Environmental Participation
- Religion
- Neoliberalism
- Cultural Evolution
- Biography
- Social Cognition
- Consciousness
- Phenomenal Experience
- Observations
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Philosophy of Science10▲ 224×3 topics
- Developmental Biology8▲ 212×2 topics
- Genetic Code8▲ 89×2 topics
- Evolutionary Synthesis8▲ 365×1 topic
- Mechanistic Explanation8▲ 365×1 topic
- History7▲ 7.6×8 topics
- Science7▲ 20×5 topics
- Ethics6▲ 10×17 topics
- Neuroscience6▲ 16×8 topics
- Philosophy6▲ 9.7×8 topics
- Community Engagement6▲ 12×4 topics
- Colonialism5▲ 8.5×9 topics
- Local Development5▲ 34×2 topics
- Social Justice5▲ 6.7×4 topics
- Territorial Governance5▲ 31×2 topics
- Sustainable Development5▲ 2.4×3 topics
- Culture5▲ 6.8×5 topics
- Public Policy4▲ 6.8×2 topics
- Technology4▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Perception4▲ 50×2 topics
- Truth4▲ 103×2 topics
- Citizen Participation4▲ 27×1 topic
- Environmental Participation4▲ 41×1 topic
- Modal Logic4▲ 114×2 topics
- Religion4▲ 6.6×9 topics
- Medicine4▲ 36×3 topics
- Neoliberalism4▲ 7.8×6 topics
- Society4▲ 14×3 topics
- Cultural Evolution4▲ 53×3 topics
- Social Change4▲ 21×3 topics
- Biography3▲ 123×2 topics
- Cognitive Science3▲ 42×2 topics
- Social Cognition3▲ 15×6 topics
- Philosophy of Mind3▲ 137×2 topics
- Consciousness3▲ 33×1 topic
- Metaphysics3▲ 52×2 topics
- Phenomenal Experience3▲ 166×1 topic
- Psychology3▲ 18×4 topics
- Observations3▲ 117×1 topic
- Sociolinguistics3▲ 11×4 topics
Which research topics does Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Philosophy and History of Science, French Urban and Social Studies, Philosophy and Theoretical Science and History of Science and Medicine.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Philosophy and History of Science History and Philosophy of Science 8 works
- 2 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 3 Philosophy and Theoretical Science Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3 works
- 4 History of Science and Medicine History and Philosophy of Science 3 works
- 5 Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 6 Classical Philosophy and Thought Philosophy 2 works
- 7 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 2 works
- 8 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 2 works
- 9 Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Philosophy 2 works
- 10 Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender Political Science and International Relations 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 23% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Paris
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Inserm
- Sorbonne Université
- Université Paris Cité
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
- Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
- Institut Pasteur
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.