Institute for History of Natural Sciences
In research, Institute for History of Natural Sciences stands highest in Social Sciences (#3,209 of 10,206 worldwide), Social Sciences (#5,838 of 16,945 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#15,947 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #21,771 of 42,892
- Rank in China
- #2,257 of 3,536
- Research works
- 490 ▼ 22% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 574 1.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 19.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 12% world 28%
What is Institute for History of Natural Sciences known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesField | #3,209 of 10,206 | 5.7% | 147 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,838 of 16,945 | 5.6% | 279 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #15,947 of 21,541 | 3.2% | 155 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute for History of Natural Sciences sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 7.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 7.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 4.6×
- Social Sciences 2.5×
- Health Professions 1.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.1×
- Decision Sciences 1.0×
- Environmental Science 1.0×
- Psychology 0.7×
- Materials Science 0.6×
- Engineering 0.6×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.4×
- Neuroscience 0.4×
- Chemical Engineering 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Institute for History of Natural Sciences?
Ranked on the composite score, Hubert Steinke lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for History of Natural Sciences.
- 1 Hubert Steinke China · #357,122 worldwide 13 citations · 30 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute for History of Natural Sciences?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: History, Cultural Heritage, Religion, Philosophy, Nationalism, China, Confucianism and Regulation.
- Media Ecology
- Telemedicine
- Digital Fabrication
- Communication
- Algorithmic Bias
- Digital Media
- Accountability
- Digitalization
- Craftivism
- Feminism
- Society
- Design
- Biodiversity
- Artificial Intelligence
- Globalization
- Iron Production
- Regulation
- China
- Philosophy
- Cultural Heritage
- History
- Religion
- Nationalism
- Confucianism
- Archaeological Analysis
- Sustainability
- Raman Spectroscopy
- Technology
- Ethics
- Hyperspectral Imaging
- X-Ray Fluorescence
- Big Data
- Handicraft
- European Union
- Cultural Studies
- Neuroscience
- Fairness
- Cultural Landscape
- Medical History
- Literacy
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- History6▲ 14×7 topics
- Cultural Heritage5▲ 17×5 topics
- Religion5▲ 18×4 topics
- Philosophy4▲ 18×3 topics
- Nationalism4▲ 16×2 topics
- China4▲ 76×3 topics
- Confucianism4▲ 157×1 topic
- Regulation4▲ 12×1 topic
- Archaeological Analysis4▲ 665×1 topic
- Iron Production4▲ 665×1 topic
- Sustainability4▲ 2.6×6 topics
- Globalization3▲ 3.1×7 topics
- Raman Spectroscopy3▲ 29×3 topics
- Artificial Intelligence3▲ 4.0×9 topics
- Technology3▲ 9.3×6 topics
- Biodiversity2▲ 6.0×3 topics
- Ethics2▲ 9.3×4 topics
- Design2▲ 26×3 topics
- Hyperspectral Imaging2▲ 15×1 topic
- Society2▲ 23×4 topics
- X-Ray Fluorescence2▲ 204×1 topic
- Feminism2▲ 13×2 topics
- Big Data2▲ 3.8×3 topics
- Craftivism2▲ 280×1 topic
- Handicraft2▲ 280×1 topic
- Digitalization2▲ 17×2 topics
- European Union2▲ 14×3 topics
- Accountability2▲ 28×2 topics
- Cultural Studies2▲ 7.9×2 topics
- Digital Media2▲ 17×2 topics
- Neuroscience2▲ 10×3 topics
- Algorithmic Bias2▲ 43×1 topic
- Fairness2▲ 34×1 topic
- Communication2▲ 8.8×2 topics
- Cultural Landscape2▲ 86×2 topics
- Digital Fabrication2▲ 36×2 topics
- Medical History2▲ 73×3 topics
- Telemedicine2▲ 21×2 topics
- Literacy1▲ 34×1 topic
- Media Ecology1▲ 594×1 topic
Which research topics does Institute for History of Natural Sciences publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Chinese history and philosophy, Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts, Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis and Crafts, Textile, and Design.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Chinese history and philosophy Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 2 Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts Archeology 4 works
- 3 Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis Archeology 2 works
- 4 Crafts, Textile, and Design Museology 2 works
- 5 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 2 works
- 6 Media, Communication, and Education Communication 1 works
- 7 Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials Building and Construction 1 works
- 8 German Security and Defense Policies Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 9 Zoonotic diseases and public health Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 10 Graphic Design and Typography History and Philosophy of Science 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute for History of Natural Sciences's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 22% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Beijing
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Tsinghua University
- Peking University
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Beihang University
- Beijing Institute of Technology
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
- North China Electric Power University
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.