Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences
In research, Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences stands highest in Social Sciences (#14,614 of 16,945 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#9,133 of 10,206 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Social Sciences — Social Sciences is 5.6× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #28,001 of 28,054 · #40,651 all time
- Rank in Russia
- #1,059 of 1,062
- Research works
- 345 ▲ 729% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 734 2.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 46% world 28%
What is Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #14,614 of 16,945 | 7.0% | 307 | |
| Social SciencesField | #9,133 of 10,206 | 6.4% | 238 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Social Sciences takes 5.6× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Social SciencesField · 44.9 works5.6×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Social Sciences 5.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.9×
- Energy 1.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.8×
- Decision Sciences 0.7×
- Arts and Humanities 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Health Professions 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences?
Ranked on the composite score, Gary Beckman and Gabriele Boccaccini lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
- 1 Gary Beckman Russia · #72,311 worldwide 82 citations · 69 works
- 2 Gabriele Boccaccini Russia · #252,872 worldwide 37 citations · 22 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: International Relations, Geopolitics, Sustainable Development, Belt and Road Initiative, Digital Economy, Global Trade, Economic Security and Globalization.
- Central Asia
- North Korea
- Identity
- Innovation
- Food Security
- Human Rights
- Shipping
- Economic Development
- Sustainability
- Christianity
- Philosophy
- Regulation
- Migration
- History
- Climate Change
- Eurasian Economic Union
- Economic Security
- Global Trade
- Belt and Road Initiative
- Geopolitics
- International Relations
- Sustainable Development
- Digital Economy
- Globalization
- Regional Integration
- High-Tech Sector
- Nationalism
- China
- Religion
- Governance
- Political Economy
- Confucianism
- Arctic
- Northern Sea Route
- Gender
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Regional Development
- Cultural Identity
- Digital Transformation
- Refugees
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- International Relations18▲ 118×5 topics
- Geopolitics16▲ 167×6 topics
- Sustainable Development11▲ 11×8 topics
- Belt and Road Initiative10▲ 444×3 topics
- Digital Economy10▲ 89×5 topics
- Global Trade10▲ 82×3 topics
- Globalization10▲ 7.6×13 topics
- Economic Security9▲ 69×3 topics
- Regional Integration9▲ 402×2 topics
- Eurasian Economic Union9▲ 825×1 topic
- High-Tech Sector9▲ 946×1 topic
- Climate Change7▲ 4.2×10 topics
- Nationalism7▲ 23×4 topics
- History7▲ 15×4 topics
- China6▲ 108×2 topics
- Migration6▲ 29×4 topics
- Religion6▲ 20×3 topics
- Regulation6▲ 17×2 topics
- Governance6▲ 27×2 topics
- Philosophy5▲ 19×2 topics
- Political Economy5▲ 33×5 topics
- Christianity5▲ 142×1 topic
- Confucianism5▲ 202×1 topic
- Sustainability5▲ 3.3×2 topics
- Arctic5▲ 64×2 topics
- Economic Development5▲ 8.9×8 topics
- Northern Sea Route4▲ 256×1 topic
- Shipping4▲ 142×1 topic
- Gender4▲ 11×3 topics
- Human Rights4▲ 5.5×4 topics
- Cultural Diplomacy4▲ 67×2 topics
- Food Security3▲ 9.5×4 topics
- Regional Development3▲ 14×3 topics
- Innovation3▲ 4.5×4 topics
- Cultural Identity3▲ 8.7×3 topics
- Identity3▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Digital Transformation2▲ 7.5×5 topics
- North Korea2▲ 557×1 topic
- Refugees2▲ 31×1 topic
- Central Asia2▲ 52×2 topics
Which research topics does Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Global Political and Economic Relations, Chinese history and philosophy, Arctic and Russian Policy Studies and Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Global Political and Economic Relations Political Science and International Relations 9 works
- 2 Chinese history and philosophy Sociology and Political Science 5 works
- 3 Arctic and Russian Policy Studies Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 4 Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 5 Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends Demography 2 works
- 6 Asian Culture and Media Studies Cultural Studies 2 works
- 7 Indian Economic and Social Development Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 8 Central Asia Education and Culture Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 9 Global trade and economics General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 works
- 10 Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation Political Science and International Relations 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 729% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Moscow
- Russian Academy of Sciences
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
- Sechenov University
- Bauman Moscow State Technical University
- Kurchatov Institute
- N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.