Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Warsaw · Poland

Institute of Computer Science

In research, Institute of Computer Science stands highest in Physical Sciences (#5,166 of 12,888 worldwide), Computer Science (#2,368 of 4,667 worldwide) and Artificial Intelligence (#1,609 of 1,884 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence — Computational Theory and Mathematics is 14.0× its share of world research.

ipipan.waw.plROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022–2025
#8,507
of 28,054 · #8,485 all time
Rank in Poland
#92
of 318
Research works
3.4k
▼ 19% vs 2013–17
Citations
45k
13.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
15.5%
record average 16.5%
Open access
31%
world 28%

What is Institute of Computer Science known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Physical SciencesDomain #5,166 of 12,888 13.8%252 #5952
Computer ScienceField #2,368 of 4,667 14.1%165 #1236
Artificial IntelligenceSubfield #1,609 of 1,884 12.8%73 #1060

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute of Computer Science sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Physical Sciences#5,952 #5,166
  2. Computer Science#1,236 #2,368
  3. Artificial Intelligence#1,060 #1,609
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

What does Institute of Computer Science specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Computational Theory and Mathematics takes 14.0× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Computational Theory and MathematicsSubfield · 20.8 works14×
  2. Artificial IntelligenceSubfield · 72.7 works8.7×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.14× its world share, 2 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.86× its world share, 16 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.21× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.82× its world share, 5 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.44× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemical Engineering: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.36× its world share, 2 worksChemistryComputer Science: 6.09× its world share, 165 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.18× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.92× its world share, 48 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.33× its world share, 6 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.16× its world share, 2 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 4.03× its world share, 16 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 1.45× its world share, 11 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.21× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.32× its world share, 21 worksMedicineNursing: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.60× its world share, 6 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.54× its world share, 6 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.89× its world share, 10 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.37× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.75× its world share, 8 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.37× its world share, 16 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Computer Science, 6.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Institute of Computer Science?

Ranked on the composite score, Adam Przepiórkowski, Piotr Dembiński and Wojciech Froelich lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute of Computer Science.

  1. 1 Adam Przepiórkowski Poland · #383,022 worldwide 86 citations · 45 works
  2. 2 Piotr Dembiński Poland · #519,629 worldwide 28 citations · 20 works
  3. 3 Wojciech Froelich Poland · #676,673 worldwide 76 citations · 20 works
  4. 4 Wojciech Penczek Poland · #757,213 worldwide 97 citations · 44 works
  5. 5 Paweł Morawiecki Poland · #888,251 worldwide 51 citations · 16 works
  6. 6 Józef Winkowski Poland · #984,945 worldwide 22 citations · 21 works
  7. 7 Franciszek Seredyński Poland · #1,191,470 worldwide 49 citations · 43 works
  8. 8 Małgorzata Marciniak Poland · #1,253,554 worldwide 9 citations · 17 works
  9. 9 J. Szwed Poland · #1,362,212 worldwide 33 citations · 17 works
  10. 10 Anna Wawrzynczak Poland · #1,469,071 worldwide 22 citations · 25 works
All ranked researchers at Institute of Computer Science

Which keywords describe research at Institute of Computer Science?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Neural Networks, Feature Selection, Classification, Model Checking, Anomaly Detection and Distributed Systems.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Deep Learning43▲ 3.6×61 topics
  2. Machine Learning40▲ 3.5×61 topics
  3. Neural Networks26▲ 4.8×31 topics
  4. Feature Selection12▲ 16×6 topics
  5. Classification10▲ 6.4×11 topics
  6. Data Mining10▲ 3.9×8 topics
  7. Model Checking9▲ 58×3 topics
  8. Anomaly Detection9▲ 8.7×5 topics
  9. Distributed Systems9▲ 15×5 topics
  10. Evolutionary Algorithms8▲ 22×5 topics
  11. Text Classification8▲ 14×3 topics
  12. Sociolinguistics7▲ 11×5 topics
  13. Language7▲ 8.1×7 topics
  14. Information Retrieval7▲ 9.0×4 topics
  15. Knowledge Representation6▲ 21×5 topics
  16. IoT Security6▲ 5.5×3 topics
  17. Temporal Logic6▲ 54×2 topics
  18. Time Series6▲ 9.7×3 topics
  19. Rough Sets6▲ 55×2 topics
  20. High-Performance Computing6▲ 20×2 topics
  21. Lexicography6▲ 18×2 topics
  22. High-Dimensional Data6▲ 10×3 topics
  23. Decision Analysis6▲ 86×1 topic
  24. Granular Computing6▲ 86×1 topic
  25. Resource Management5▲ 9.1×3 topics
  26. Description Logics5▲ 30×2 topics
  27. Ethnography5▲ 8.1×2 topics
  28. Topic Modeling5▲ 9.6×2 topics
  29. Machine Translation5▲ 8.3×1 topic
  30. Translation5▲ 8.0×3 topics
  31. Word Representation5▲ 11×1 topic
  32. Ethnolinguistics5▲ 40×1 topic
  33. Multilingualism5▲ 7.8×1 topic
  34. Deep Neural Networks4▲ 12×3 topics
  35. Data Integration4▲ 7.6×5 topics
  36. Parallel Computing4▲ 11×3 topics
  37. Clustering Algorithms4▲ 17×3 topics
  38. Genetic Algorithm4▲ 8.6×6 topics
  39. Workflow Management4▲ 18×2 topics
  40. Outlier Detection4▲ 8.7×2 topics

Which research topics does Institute of Computer Science publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Topic Modeling, Language and Culture and Natural Language Processing Techniques.

Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic6Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic: 6 fractional worksTopic Modeling5Topic Modeling: 5 fractional worksLanguage and Culture: 5 fractional worksNatural Language Processing Techniques: 4 fractional worksAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications: 3 fractional worksData Mining Algorithms and Applications: 3 fractional worksNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection: 3 fractional worksFormal Methods in Verifi…3Formal Methods in Verification: 3 fractional worksNeural Networks and Applications: 3 fractional worksLogic, programming, and type systems: 3 fractional works
Computational Theory and MathematicsArtificial IntelligenceLinguistics and LanguageInformation Systems1 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic Computational Theory and Mathematics 6 works
  2. 2 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 5 works
  3. 3 Language and Culture Linguistics and Language 5 works
  4. 4 Natural Language Processing Techniques Artificial Intelligence 4 works
  5. 5 Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications Artificial Intelligence 3 works
  6. 6 Data Mining Algorithms and Applications Information Systems 3 works
  7. 7 Network Security and Intrusion Detection Computer Networks and Communications 3 works
  8. 8 Formal Methods in Verification Computational Theory and Mathematics 3 works
  9. 9 Neural Networks and Applications Artificial Intelligence 3 works
  10. 10 Logic, programming, and type systems Artificial Intelligence 3 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available30.8%not open69.2%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors20.6%domestic only79.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Institute of Computer Science's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 19% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Warsaw

All research institutions in Warsaw

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.