Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics
In research, Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics stands highest in Physical Sciences (#11,924 of 12,888 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Geophysics and Earth and Planetary Sciences — Geophysics is 129.3× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #25,350 of 28,054 · #27,848 all time
- Rank in Russia
- #850 of 1,062
- Research works
- 602 ▼ 23% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 7.6k 12.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 4.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 26% world 28%
What is Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #11,924 of 12,888 | 5.0% | 78 | #15219 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Geophysics takes 129.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- GeophysicsSubfield · 38.0 works129×
- Earth and Planetary SciencesField · 47.4 works36×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 36.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 36.0×
- Mathematics 3.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 2.1×
- Computer Science 1.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.8×
- Engineering 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Chemical Engineering 0.4×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics?
Ranked on the composite score, V. I. Keilis‐Borok, В. Ф. Писаренко and V. G. Kossobokov lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics.
- 1 V. I. Keilis‐Borok Russia · #112,046 worldwide 206 citations · 42 works
- 2 В. Ф. Писаренко Russia · #152,743 worldwide 326 citations · 34 works
- 3 V. G. Kossobokov Russia · #585,237 worldwide 132 citations · 43 works
- 4 G. M. Molchan Russia · #698,251 worldwide 91 citations · 19 works
- 5 П. Н. Шебалин Russia · #1,081,251 worldwide 51 citations · 33 works
- 6 Alik Ismail‐Zadeh Russia · #1,161,219 worldwide 62 citations · 45 works
- 7 М. В. Родкин Russia · #1,222,320 worldwide 57 citations · 35 works
- 8 A. Soloviev Russia · #1,351,692 worldwide 34 citations · 19 works
- 9 M. G. Shnirman Russia · #1,466,063 worldwide 24 citations · 19 works
- 10 Alexander Shapoval Russia · #1,611,215 worldwide 7 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Geodetic Measurements, Subduction, Earthquakes, Plate Boundaries, Plate Tectonics, Ionospheric Anomalies, Seismic Electromagnetics and Tectonics.
- Synchronization
- Seismic Noise
- Inverse Problems
- Sea Level
- Magnetosome Formation
- Wave Propagation
- Rock Mechanics
- Zircon
- Mineral Prospectivity
- geology
- Geological Mapping
- Arctic
- Continental Margin
- Seismic Signals
- Mantle Dynamics
- Tomography
- Seismic Electromagnetics
- Machine Learning
- Plate Boundaries
- Subduction
- Geodetic Measurements
- Earthquakes
- Plate Tectonics
- Ionospheric Anomalies
- Tectonics
- Crystal Structure Prediction
- Earthquake Detection
- Remote Sensing
- Crustal Structure
- Hyperspectral Imaging
- Petroleum
- Compositional Data Analysis
- Geochronology
- Climate Change
- Seismicity
- Geomagnetic Field
- Holocene
- Sea Level Rise
- Solar Wind
- Surface Wave
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Geodetic Measurements18▲ 196×2 topics
- Subduction17▲ 276×2 topics
- Earthquakes17▲ 351×1 topic
- Plate Boundaries17▲ 351×1 topic
- Plate Tectonics10▲ 77×3 topics
- Machine Learning10▲ 3.5×5 topics
- Ionospheric Anomalies9▲ 290×1 topic
- Seismic Electromagnetics9▲ 290×1 topic
- Tectonics8▲ 83×3 topics
- Tomography7▲ 45×2 topics
- Crystal Structure Prediction6▲ 142×1 topic
- Mantle Dynamics6▲ 142×1 topic
- Earthquake Detection5▲ 299×1 topic
- Seismic Signals5▲ 299×1 topic
- Remote Sensing5▲ 4.8×3 topics
- Continental Margin5▲ 94×2 topics
- Crustal Structure5▲ 94×2 topics
- Arctic5▲ 49×2 topics
- Hyperspectral Imaging4▲ 18×2 topics
- Geological Mapping4▲ 62×2 topics
- Petroleum4▲ 107×1 topic
- geology4▲ 209×1 topic
- Compositional Data Analysis4▲ 75×1 topic
- Mineral Prospectivity4▲ 75×1 topic
- Geochronology4▲ 65×1 topic
- Zircon4▲ 65×1 topic
- Climate Change3▲ 1.46×8 topics
- Rock Mechanics3▲ 37×2 topics
- Seismicity3▲ 97×1 topic
- Wave Propagation3▲ 31×1 topic
- Geomagnetic Field2▲ 116×1 topic
- Magnetosome Formation2▲ 116×1 topic
- Holocene2▲ 21×2 topics
- Sea Level2▲ 25×2 topics
- Sea Level Rise2▲ 15×2 topics
- Inverse Problems2▲ 17×2 topics
- Solar Wind1▲ 18×2 topics
- Seismic Noise1▲ 33×1 topic
- Surface Wave1▲ 33×1 topic
- Synchronization1▲ 13×2 topics
Which research topics does Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: earthquake and tectonic studies, Earthquake Detection and Analysis, High-pressure geophysics and materials and Seismology and Earthquake Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 earthquake and tectonic studies Geophysics 17 works
- 2 Earthquake Detection and Analysis Geophysics 9 works
- 3 High-pressure geophysics and materials Geophysics 6 works
- 4 Seismology and Earthquake Studies Artificial Intelligence 5 works
- 5 Geological Studies and Exploration Geology 4 works
- 6 Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping Artificial Intelligence 4 works
- 7 Geological and Geochemical Analysis Geophysics 4 works
- 8 Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering Mechanics of Materials 3 works
- 9 Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies Molecular Biology 2 works
- 10 Seismic Waves and Analysis Geophysics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 23% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Moscow
- Russian Academy of Sciences
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
- Sechenov University
- Bauman Moscow State Technical University
- Kurchatov Institute
- N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.