Earthquake Detection and Analysis
Earthquake Detection and Analysis is a research topic within Geophysics. Science Explorer counts 39k research works in it since 1950. 14.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the study of various phenomena that may serve as potential earthquake precursors, including ionospheric anomalies, seismic electromagnetics, pre-earthquake signals, thermal infrared emission, lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling, electromagnetic radiation, and geoelectric potential changes. The research also involves monitoring seismic activity and developing earthquake prediction models.
- Ionospheric Anomalies
- Seismic Electromagnetics
- Pre-earthquake Signals
- Thermal Infrared Emission
- Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling
- Electromagnetic Radiation
- Seismic Activity Monitoring
- Geoelectric Potential Changes
- ULF Geomagnetic Variations
- Earthquake Prediction Models
- Research works
- 39k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 5.4k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 14.0% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +93% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Earthquake Detection and Analysis research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (3.5k and 1.2k works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 3.5k works
- 2 China 1.2k works
- 3 Russia 635 works
- 4 India 420 works
- 5 Japan 268 works
- 6 Italy 201 works
- 7 Türkiye 166 works
- 8 France 142 works
- 9 United Kingdom 120 works
- 10 Germany 116 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Earthquake Detection and Analysis research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Purdue University West Lafayette publishes the most Earthquake Detection and Analysis research, followed by University of California, Berkeley and University of California, Davis.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Purdue University West Lafayette United States 977 works
- 2 University of California, Berkeley United States 361 works
- 3 University of California, Davis United States 252 works
- 4 University of Toledo United States 250 works
- 5 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center United States 191 works
- 6 China Earthquake Administration China 102 works
- 7 University of Arizona United States 94 works
- 8 Aerodyne Research United States 91 works
- 9 Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth Russia 74 works
- 10 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Italy 60 works
Who are the leading researchers in Earthquake Detection and Analysis?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Earthquake Detection and Analysis include Xiaogang Wang.
- 1 Xiaogang Wang 13k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Earthquake Detection and Analysis research done?
The largest centres of Earthquake Detection and Analysis research in 2022–2025 are West Lafayette (United States), Beijing (China), Berkeley (United States) and Moscow (Russia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Billerica, Toledo and West Lafayette.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 West Lafayette United States 977 works
- 2 Beijing China 422 works
- 3 Berkeley United States 363 works
- 4 Moscow Russia 315 works
- 5 Davis United States 252 works
- 6 Toledo United States 250 works
- 7 St Louis United States 192 works
- 8 Tucson United States 115 works
- 9 Washington D.C. United States 111 works
- 10 Wuhan China 111 works
Where it is the local speciality
- BillericaUS · 91.1 works230×
- ToledoUS · 250.2 works143×
- West LafayetteUS · 976.6 works126×
- CheyenneUS · 23.5 works102×
- ObninskRU · 36.6 works97×
- MurmanskRU · 20.6 works60×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Earthquake Detection and Analysis than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Earthquake Detection and Analysis?
Among universities, judged by research, Purdue University West Lafayette, China University of Mining and Technology and California Institute of Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purdue University West Lafayette United States | 62.3 | 0.1% | 127.8× | 977 | +1336.0% |
| 2 | China University of Mining and Technology China | 60.6 | 40.9% | 7.3× | 46 | +85.1% |
| 3 | California Institute of Technology United States | 51.6 | 43.0% | 6.8× | 13 | -19.6% |
| 4 | University of California, Berkeley United States | 48.9 | 0.7% | 53.6× | 361 | +25.2% |
| 5 | University of Toledo United States | 46.8 | 0.0% | 164.8× | 250 | — |
| 6 | China University of Geosciences China | 46.2 | 24.1% | 6.1× | 22 | +105.7% |
| 7 | V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Ukraine | 45.7 | 19.6% | 10.7× | 17 | +11.0% |
| 8 | National Central University Taiwan | 45.2 | 18.8% | 11.4× | 13 | -6.2% |
| 9 | ETH Zurich Switzerland | 43.9 | 45.7% | 1.8× | 10 | +25.0% |
| 10 | University of California, Davis United States | 43.8 | 0.1% | 42.7× | 252 | -25.8% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Earthquake Detection and Analysis research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 93% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2022. The fastest-growing topics are Earthquake Detection and Analysis.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.