Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Geophysics

Geological Formations and Processes Exploration

Geological Formations and Processes Exploration is a research topic within Geophysics. Science Explorer counts 9.2k research works in it since 1950. 9.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the tectonic evolution, geodynamic processes, and seismic structure of the Carpathian-Pannonian region, including the Alpine orogeny, Pannonian Basin formation, and Neogene continental collision. It explores crustal deformation, seismicity, and the geological history of the area during the Miocene period.

  • Carpathian-Pannonian region
  • tectonic evolution
  • Alpine orogeny
  • Pannonian Basin
  • geodynamic
  • Neogene
  • seismic structure
  • crustal deformation
  • Miocene
  • continental collision
Research works
9.2k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
878
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-1%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Geological Formations and Processes Exploration research?

By volume, Poland and Hungary publish the most (221 and 95 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Poland 221 works
  2. 2 Hungary 95 works
  3. 3 United States 87 works
  4. 4 Ukraine 73 works
  5. 5 Russia 73 works
  6. 6 Czechia 64 works
  7. 7 Germany 48 works
  8. 8 Slovakia 48 works
  9. 9 Croatia 44 works
  10. 10 Romania 44 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Poland: 27.7%Hungary: 12.0%United States: 10.9%Ukraine: 9.2%6 others listed: 40.2%28%largest
Poland221 · 27.7%Hungary95 · 12.0%United States87 · 10.9%Ukraine73 · 9.2%6 others listed321 · 40.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Geological Formations and Processes Exploration research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Polish Geological Institute publishes the most Geological Formations and Processes Exploration research, followed by AGH University of Krakow and Eötvös Loránd University.

Who are the leading researchers in Geological Formations and Processes Exploration?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Geological Formations and Processes Exploration include Suzanne Y. O’Reilly, Axel Gerdes and Urs Schaltegger.

  1. 1 Suzanne Y. O’Reilly Australia 2.2k citations
  2. 2 Axel Gerdes Germany 2.1k citations
  3. 3 Urs Schaltegger Switzerland 1.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Geological Formations and Processes Exploration research done?

The largest centres of Geological Formations and Processes Exploration research in 2022–2025 are Warsaw (Poland), Budapest (Hungary), Krakow (Poland) and Kyiv (Ukraine). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Bratislava, Zagreb and Krakow.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Warsaw Poland 93 works
  2. 2 Budapest Hungary 57 works
  3. 3 Krakow Poland 53 works
  4. 4 Kyiv Ukraine 44 works
  5. 5 Zagreb Croatia 36 works
  6. 6 Prague Czechia 36 works
  7. 7 Moscow Russia 36 works
  8. 8 Bratislava Slovakia 34 works
  9. 9 Belgrade Serbia 26 works
  10. 10 Sofia Bulgaria 23 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. BratislavaSK · 34.5 works36×
  2. ZagrebHR · 36.2 works31×
  3. KrakowPL · 52.8 works28×
  4. WarsawPL · 93.0 works27×
  5. BudapestHU · 57.1 works26×
  6. BelgradeRS · 25.9 works20×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Geological Formations and Processes Exploration than the world average.

See Geological Formations and Processes Exploration on the map

Where is the best place to study Geological Formations and Processes Exploration?

Among universities, judged by research, Eötvös Loránd University, University of Belgrade and AGH University of Krakow score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 9.43%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Eötvös Loránd University: 24, 18.4%University of Belgrade: 19, 12.7%AGH University of Krakow: 24, 10.0%University of Zagreb: 22, 7.3%University of Wrocław: 13, 12.6%Comenius University Bratislava: 11, 7.4%University of Warsaw: 17, 4.8%Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: 8, 3.9%University of Silesia in Katowice: 12, 6.7%University of Miskolc: 9, 10.5%Eötvös Loránd Univer…University of BelgradeAGH University of Kr…University of Zagreb
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Eötvös Loránd UniversityHungary 81.318.4%76.8×24 +9.8%
2 University of BelgradeSerbia 72.312.7%27.7×19 +59.3%
3 AGH University of KrakowPoland 70.710.0%53.8×24 +46.0%
4 University of ZagrebCroatia 62.17.3%34.8×22 +27.7%
5 University of WrocławPoland 57.512.6%55.8×13 -4.5%
6 Comenius University BratislavaSlovakia 51.47.4%51.4×11 +18.6%
7 University of WarsawPoland 48.64.8%30.0×17 -39.1%
8 Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivUkraine 47.63.9%27.1×8 +261.1%
9 University of Silesia in KatowicePoland 46.36.7%49.2×12 -14.2%
10 University of MiskolcHungary 46.010.5%62.8×9 -12.2%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Geological Formations and Processes Exploration research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 1% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2016. The fastest-growing topics are Geological Formations and Processes Exploration.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.