Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies is a research topic within Molecular Biology. Science Explorer counts 46k research works in it since 1950. 14.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the formation of magnetosomes in prokaryotes, the study of geomagnetic field variations over centuries, the application of dynamo simulations, and the analysis of magnetic properties and biomineralization processes. It also includes research on paleomagnetic data, environmental magnetism, and the development of geomagnetic models.

  • Magnetosome Formation
  • Geomagnetic Field
  • Magnetotactic Bacteria
  • Paleomagnetic Data
  • Dynamo Simulations
  • Magnetic Properties
  • Biomineralization
  • Secular Variation
  • Geomagnetic Model
  • Environmental Magnetism
Research works
46k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
14.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+1%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (884 and 835 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 884 works
  2. 2 United States 835 works
  3. 3 Russia 614 works
  4. 4 France 239 works
  5. 5 Germany 222 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 219 works
  7. 7 India 198 works
  8. 8 Japan 165 works
  9. 9 Italy 107 works
  10. 10 Spain 79 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 24.8%United States: 23.4%Russia: 17.2%France: 6.7%6 others listed: 27.8%25%largest
China884 · 24.8%United States835 · 23.4%Russia614 · 17.2%France239 · 6.7%6 others listed991 · 27.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Sciences publishes the most Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies research, followed by Lomonosov Moscow State University and Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation.

Who are the leading researchers in Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies include S. S. Meyer.

  1. 1 S. S. Meyer United States 7.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies research done?

The largest centres of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Moscow (Russia), Paris (France) and Wuhan (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in North Laurel, Greenbelt and Perm.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 348 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 291 works
  3. 3 Paris France 98 works
  4. 4 Wuhan China 81 works
  5. 5 Boulder United States 77 works
  6. 6 Tokyo Japan 47 works
  7. 7 Yekaterinburg Russia 46 works
  8. 8 Saint Petersburg Russia 45 works
  9. 9 Washington D.C. United States 44 works
  10. 10 London United Kingdom 40 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. North LaurelUS · 21.8 works78×
  2. GreenbeltUS · 29.1 works68×
  3. PermRU · 21.1 works29×
  4. BoulderUS · 77.0 works25×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies than the world average.

See Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Colorado Boulder, China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Lomonosov Moscow State University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 16.5%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Colorado Boulder: 27, 20.9%China University of Geosciences (Beijing): 22, 20.3%Lomonosov Moscow State University: 43, 3.8%China University of Geosciences: 23, 12.2%University of Chinese Academy of Sciences: 40, 17.5%Beihang University: 28, 18.3%University of New Hampshire: 8, 20.7%Wuhan University: 36, 15.0%Princeton University: 9, 29.5%Macau University of Science and Technology: 10, 6.8%University of Colora…China University of …China University of …Lomonosov Moscow Sta…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of Colorado BoulderUnited States 65.020.9%15.4×27 +24.0%
2 China University of Geosciences (Beijing)China 59.120.3%17.0×22 -25.7%
3 Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussia 56.03.8%11.2×43 +50.2%
4 China University of GeosciencesChina 53.212.2%11.1×23 -0.9%
5 University of Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 52.617.5%5.4×40 +38.0%
6 Beihang UniversityChina 51.718.3%5.5×28 +72.7%
7 University of New HampshireUnited States 51.520.7%20.0×8 -11.7%
8 Wuhan UniversityChina 50.115.0%6.5×36 +7.8%
9 Princeton UniversityUnited States 48.929.5%4.7×9 +22.2%
10 Macau University of Science and TechnologyMacau 48.56.8%10.2×10

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 1% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2014. The fastest-growing topics are Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.