Science Explorer Back to mapMap

Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies is a research topic within Molecular Biology. Science Explorer counts 81k research works in it since 1950. 9.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the statistical analysis, alignment, and annotation of RNA sequencing data, including methods for transcript quantification, phylogenetic analysis, genome assembly, and quality assessment in functional genomics. It also covers tools for sequence variation analysis and metagenomics assembly.

  • RNA-seq
  • sequence alignment
  • phylogenetic analysis
  • genome annotation
  • transcript quantification
  • metagenomics assembly
  • sequence variation
  • phylogenetic tree
  • functional genomics
  • quality assessment
Research works
81k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
7.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
-4%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
China
39% of the 10 largest, 2022-now

Which countries lead Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (4.6k and 2.8k works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 China 4.6k works
  2. 2 United States 2.8k works
  3. 3 India 722 works
  4. 4 Germany 646 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 586 works
  6. 6 Japan 531 works
  7. 7 South Korea 507 works
  8. 8 France 501 works
  9. 9 Canada 351 works
  10. 10 Australia 333 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 39.4%United States: 24.6%India: 6.2%Germany: 5.6%6 others listed: 24.2%39%largest
China4,575 · 39.4%United States2,849 · 24.6%India722 · 6.2%Germany646 · 5.6%6 others listed2,809 · 24.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies research?

By volume in 2022-now, Chinese Academy of Sciences publishes the most Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies research, followed by Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

Who are the leading researchers in Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies include Eric S. Lander, Yoshua Bengio and Rob Knight.

  1. 1 Eric S. Lander United States 524k citations
  2. 2 Yoshua Bengio Canada 476k citations
  3. 3 Rob Knight United States 468k citations
  4. 4 Richard M. Durbin United Kingdom 410k citations
  5. 5 Mark J. Daly United States 403k citations
  6. 6 Stacey L. Gabriel United States 402k citations
  7. 7 Peer Bork Germany 396k citations
  8. 8 Robert John Tibshirani United States 396k citations
  9. 9 Bert Vogelstein United States 373k citations
  10. 10 Steven L. Salzberg United States 372k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies?

The most cited paper in Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies is "Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4" (Ulrich K. Laemmli, 1970), with 252,153 citations. Next come "Basic local alignment search tool" (95,803) and "Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs" (75,032).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 Ulrich K. Laemmli · Nature Open access Aug 1970 252,153
2 Basic local alignment search tool Stephen F. Altschul, Warren R. Gish, Webb Miller et al. · Journal of Molecular Biology Oct 1990 95,803
3 Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs Stephen F. Altschul · Nucleic Acids Research Open access Sep 1997 75,032
4 Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis Johannes Schindelin, Ignacio Arganda‐Carreras, Erwin Frise et al. · Nature Methods Open access 28 Jun 2012 73,171
5 Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data Anthony Bolger, Marc Lohse, Björn Usadel · Bioinformatics Open access Apr 2014 71,819
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies research done?

The largest centres of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Guangzhou (China), Paris (France) and Shanghai (China).

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BeijingChina 898 works
  2. 2 GuangzhouChina 236 works
  3. 3 ParisFrance 233 works
  4. 4 ShanghaiChina 181 works
  5. 5 NanjingChina 179 works
  6. 6 TokyoJapan 169 works
  7. 7 SeoulSouth Korea 160 works
  8. 8 KunmingChina 157 works
  9. 9 HangzhouChina 146 works
  10. 10 MoscowRussia 145 works
See Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Harvard University, University of Copenhagen and ETH Zurich score highest, combining citation excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 17.74%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Harvard UniversityETH ZurichUniversity of Copenh…University of Chines…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Citation excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Harvard UniversityUnited States 70.723.4%1.5×66 -25.7%
2University of CopenhagenDenmark 68.815.8%4.0×51 +42.0%
3ETH ZurichSwitzerland 64.118.8%3.0×28 +17.9%
4University of Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 62.913.6%3.8×84 +4.8%
5University of California, Santa CruzUnited States 61.615.7%8.3×20 +12.5%
6Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 60.719.6%1.7×35 +1.8%
7University of California, BerkeleyUnited States 60.518.6%2.8×37 -9.0%
8City University of Hong KongChina 60.123.1%2.0×15 +53.1%
9University of California San DiegoUnited States 59.813.9%3.9×52 -15.0%
10University of British ColumbiaCanada 59.314.9%2.4×38 +6.9%

Universities only. The score blends citation excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, country by country

Is Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 4% lower than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2021.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.060% in 2024.

still counting0.050%0.10%Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies0.057% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies9.5% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.