Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Protist diversity and phylogeny

Protist diversity and phylogeny is a research topic within Molecular Biology. Science Explorer counts 27k research works in it since 1950. 22.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the global diversity and evolutionary origins of microbial eukaryotes, with a focus on plastid evolution, protist taxonomy, and genomic diversity. It delves into the phylogenetic analysis of marine eukaryotes, endosymbiotic associations, and environmental DNA sequencing to uncover the complexity of eukaryotic microbial communities in various environments.

  • Eukaryotic Microbes
  • Microbial Diversity
  • Evolutionary Origins
  • Plastid Evolution
  • Protist Taxonomy
  • Genomic Diversity
  • Marine Eukaryotes
  • Phylogenetic Analysis
  • Endosymbiotic Associations
  • Environmental DNA Sequencing
Research works
27k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
22.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+2%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Protist diversity and phylogeny research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (635 and 542 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 635 works
  2. 2 United States 542 works
  3. 3 Germany 186 works
  4. 4 Japan 183 works
  5. 5 France 166 works
  6. 6 Russia 142 works
  7. 7 United Kingdom 114 works
  8. 8 India 93 works
  9. 9 Spain 91 works
  10. 10 South Korea 78 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 28.5%United States: 24.3%Germany: 8.4%Japan: 8.2%6 others listed: 30.7%28%largest
China635 · 28.5%United States542 · 24.3%Germany186 · 8.4%Japan183 · 8.2%6 others listed684 · 30.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Protist diversity and phylogeny research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Sciences publishes the most Protist diversity and phylogeny research, followed by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Ocean University of China.

Who are the leading researchers in Protist diversity and phylogeny?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Protist diversity and phylogeny include Peer Bork, Hiroyuki Ogata and Erko Stackebrandt.

  1. 1 Peer Bork Germany 4.7k citations
  2. 2 Hiroyuki Ogata Japan 4.1k citations
  3. 3 Erko Stackebrandt Germany 2.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Protist diversity and phylogeny research done?

The largest centres of Protist diversity and phylogeny research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Paris (France), Qingdao (China) and Moscow (Russia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Qingdao.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 134 works
  2. 2 Paris France 74 works
  3. 3 Qingdao China 66 works
  4. 4 Moscow Russia 59 works
  5. 5 Tokyo Japan 41 works
  6. 6 Guangzhou China 36 works
  7. 7 Shanghai China 33 works
  8. 8 Nanjing China 30 works
  9. 9 Saint Petersburg Russia 29 works
  10. 10 Madrid Spain 26 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. QingdaoCN · 66.5 works6.7×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Protist diversity and phylogeny than the world average.

See Protist diversity and phylogeny on the map

Where is the best place to study Protist diversity and phylogeny?

Among universities, judged by research, Ocean University of China, Charles University and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 21.94%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Ocean University of China: 27, 23.0%Charles University: 15, 14.3%University of Chinese Academy of Sciences: 19, 28.5%University of Vienna: 10, 33.0%Xiamen University: 16, 22.7%University of Cologne: 11, 12.3%Sorbonne Université: 10, 20.0%University of Copenhagen: 9, 31.0%Shanghai Ocean University: 12, 13.0%Dalhousie University: 8, 21.6%University of ViennaUniversity of Chines…Ocean University of …Charles University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Ocean University of ChinaChina 64.823.0%17.8×27 +8.2%
2 Charles UniversityCzechia 58.314.3%11.7×15 +49.9%
3 University of Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 53.528.5%3.9×19 +86.4%
4 University of ViennaAustria 53.233.0%6.6×10 +10.7%
5 Xiamen UniversityChina 49.922.7%7.2×16 +16.9%
6 University of CologneGermany 48.112.3%11.9×11 +20.5%
7 Sorbonne UniversitéFrance 46.620.0%7.2×10 +9.9%
8 University of CopenhagenDenmark 46.031.0%4.5×9 +17.3%
9 Shanghai Ocean UniversityChina 45.313.0%18.4×12 +0.2%
10 Dalhousie UniversityCanada 43.421.6%8.0×8 -0.5%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Protist diversity and phylogeny research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 2% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Protist diversity and phylogeny.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.