Science Explorer Back to mapMap

DNA Repair Mechanisms

DNA Repair Mechanisms is a research topic within Molecular Biology. Science Explorer counts 56k research works in it since 1950. 9.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the molecular mechanisms of the DNA damage response, including DNA repair pathways, genomic instability, the role of ATM and ATR kinases, homologous recombination, cell cycle checkpoints, and their implications in cancer biology. It also explores the involvement of histone H2AX and chromatin in maintaining genome stability.

  • DNA Damage
  • Repair
  • Genomic Instability
  • ATM and ATR Kinases
  • Homologous Recombination
  • Cell Cycle Checkpoints
  • Cancer
  • Histone H2AX
  • Chromatin
  • Genome Stability
Research works
56k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
5.5k
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
-14%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
United States
38% of the 10 largest, 2022-now

Which countries lead DNA Repair Mechanisms research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.7k and 977 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States 1.7k works
  2. 2 China 977 works
  3. 3 Japan 302 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 290 works
  5. 5 France 242 works
  6. 6 Germany 238 works
  7. 7 India 215 works
  8. 8 Italy 153 works
  9. 9 Russia 145 works
  10. 10 Canada 132 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 38.2%China: 22.4%Japan: 6.9%United Kingdom: 6.7%6 others listed: 25.8%38%largest
United States1,663 · 38.2%China977 · 22.4%Japan302 · 6.9%United Kingdom290 · 6.7%6 others listed1,124 · 25.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead DNA Repair Mechanisms research?

By volume in 2022-now, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique publishes the most DNA Repair Mechanisms research, followed by Russian Academy of Sciences and National Institutes of Health.

Who are the leading researchers in DNA Repair Mechanisms?

The most-cited researchers publishing on DNA Repair Mechanisms include Eric S. Lander, Richard M. Durbin and Mark J. Daly.

  1. 1 Eric S. Lander United States 524k citations
  2. 2 Richard M. Durbin United Kingdom 410k citations
  3. 3 Mark J. Daly United States 403k citations
  4. 4 Stacey L. Gabriel United States 402k citations
  5. 5 Peer Bork Germany 396k citations
  6. 6 Guido Kroemer France 386k citations
  7. 7 Bert Vogelstein United States 373k citations
  8. 8 Gad A. Getz United States 364k citations
  9. 9 Elaine R. Mardis United States 346k citations
  10. 10 Hermann Brenner Germany 343k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in DNA Repair Mechanisms?

The most cited paper in DNA Repair Mechanisms is "The Hallmarks of Cancer" (Douglas Hanahan, Robert A. Weinberg, 2000), with 28,893 citations. Next come "A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells" (20,633) and "Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer" (10,284).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The Hallmarks of Cancer Douglas Hanahan, Robert A. Weinberg · Cell Open access 2000 28,893
2 A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells S.A. Miller, Dale D. Dykes, Herbert F. Polesky · Nucleic Acids Research Open access 1988 20,633
3 Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative et al. · Nature Open access 14 Aug 2013 10,284
4 Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution Karolin Luger, Armin W. Mäder, Robin K. Richmond et al. · Nature Sep 1997 9,627
5 A Film Detection Method for Tritium‐Labelled Proteins and Nucleic Acids in Polyacrylamide Gels William M. Bonner, Ronald Alfred Laskey · European Journal of Biochemistry Open access Jul 1974 8,651
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is DNA Repair Mechanisms research done?

The largest centres of DNA Repair Mechanisms research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Paris (France), New York (United States) and Shanghai (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Bethesda and Novosibirsk.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BeijingChina 143 works
  2. 2 ParisFrance 110 works
  3. 3 New YorkUnited States 110 works
  4. 4 ShanghaiChina 85 works
  5. 5 TokyoJapan 83 works
  6. 6 LondonUnited Kingdom 78 works
  7. 7 GuangzhouChina 68 works
  8. 8 MoscowRussia 65 works
  9. 9 HoustonUnited States 61 works
  10. 10 HangzhouChina 53 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. BethesdaUS · 52.5 works8.0×
  2. NovosibirskRU · 37.8 works6.2×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in DNA Repair Mechanisms than the world average.

See DNA Repair Mechanisms on the map

Where is the best place to study DNA Repair Mechanisms?

Among universities, judged by research, Harvard University, Rockefeller University and Institute of Cancer Research score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 20.2%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Institute of Cancer …University of Cambri…Rockefeller UniversityHarvard University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Harvard UniversityUnited States 74.419.1%4.2×64 -23.3%
2Rockefeller UniversityUnited States 67.121.9%55.7×16 +3.1%
3Institute of Cancer ResearchUnited Kingdom 63.929.7%53.9×8 +4.6%
4University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 59.723.0%3.3×19 -15.6%
5University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 57.917.7%3.6×24 -40.4%
6Oncode InstituteNetherlands 53.720.3%62.3×8 -26.5%
7University of BirminghamUnited Kingdom 53.018.7%3.9×12 +10.3%
8University of SussexUnited Kingdom 51.023.8%8.4×10 -40.0%
9Cornell UniversityUnited States 50.811.5%4.3×27 -13.7%
10Stanford UniversityUnited States 50.616.3%2.4×17 -4.4%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in DNA Repair Mechanisms, country by country

Is DNA Repair Mechanisms research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 14% lower than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2013.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is DNA Repair Mechanisms as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.022% in 2024.

still counting0.050%0.10%0.15%DNA Repair Mechanisms0.021% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of DNA Repair Mechanisms over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%DNA Repair Mechanisms10.1% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about DNA Repair Mechanisms. Posts are plain text and can be reported.