- Research works
- 116 ▲ 7% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 2.9k 24.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.4% all institutions 10.0%
- Open access
- 67% world 40%
- International
- 48% world 18%
Not ranked overall: Instituto Pró-Carnívoros is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Which fields of science does Instituto Pró-Carnívoros work in?
In 2022-now, 59% of research at Instituto Pró-Carnívoros is in Physical Sciences, 19% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (54%), Psychology (11%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (7%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Physical Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences1759.3%
- Environmental Science1653.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences25.4%
- Computer Science00.4%
- Social Sciences619.3%
- Psychology311.0%
- Social Sciences25.7%
- Arts and Humanities12.4%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.2%
- Life Sciences412.3%
- Health Sciences39.1%
- Medicine14.6%
- Veterinary13.9%
- Health Professions00.4%
- Nursing00.2%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 29.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 14 fields, with their numbers
- Veterinary28.99×1 works
- Environmental Science10.77×16 works
- Psychology3.61×3 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences3.44×2 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.76×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.29×2 works
- Arts and Humanities0.83×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.77×1 works
- Social Sciences0.45×2 works
- Nursing0.33×0 works
- Medicine0.24×1 works
- Health Professions0.14×0 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.09×0 works
- Computer Science0.05×0 works
- Veterinary 29.0×
- Environmental Science 10.8×
- Psychology 3.6×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 3.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.3×
- Arts and Humanities 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.5×
- Nursing 0.3×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Health Professions 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Instituto Pró-Carnívoros?
Ranked on the quality score, Dênis A. Sana, Fernando César Cascelli de Azevedo and Cláudia Bueno de Campos lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Instituto Pró-Carnívoros.
- 1
Dênis A. Sana
Brazil · #512,085 worldwide 1.6k citations · 30 works
- 2
Fernando César Cascelli de Azevedo
Brazil · #754,478 worldwide 2.4k citations · 63 works
- 3
Cláudia Bueno de Campos
Brazil · #1,165,296 worldwide 1.3k citations · 38 works
- 4
Joares Adenílson May-Júnior
Brazil · #1,208,417 worldwide 1.1k citations · 56 works
- 5
Sandra M. C. Cavalcanti
Brazil · #1,218,232 worldwide 1.2k citations · 24 works
- 6
Henrique Villas Boas Concone
Brazil · #1,229,011 worldwide 357 citations · 20 works
- 7
Carolina Franco Esteves
Brazil · #1,847,285 worldwide 519 citations · 24 works
- 8
Ricardo Luiz Pires Boulhosa
Brazil · #2,263,733 worldwide 561 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at Instituto Pró-Carnívoros?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Population Dynamics, Habitat Selection, Animal Movement, Occupancy Rates, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Conservation and Conservation Biology.
- Hydrographic Basins
- Environmental Conservation
- Stress Indicators
- Rodent Eradication
- Mast Seeding
- Ecological Niche
- Predator-Prey Interactions
- Mammal Evolution
- Globalization
- Biogeography
- Road Ecology
- Habitat Connectivity
- Molecular Phylogeny
- Primates
- Conservation Biology
- Biodiversity
- Occupancy Rates
- Habitat Selection
- Population Dynamics
- Animal Movement
- Climate Change
- Conservation
- Invasive Species
- Social Behavior
- Environmental Impact
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Genetic Structure
- Epidemiology
- Island Ecosystems
- Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis
- Animal Welfare
- Genetic Diversity
- Remote Sensing
- Species Distribution Modeling
- Education
- Global Change
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 36 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 36 words, with their numbers
- Population Dynamics8▲ 113×6 topics
- Habitat Selection6▲ 304×2 topics
- Animal Movement6▲ 421×1 topic
- Occupancy Rates6▲ 421×1 topic
- Climate Change4▲ 5.2×17 topics
- Biodiversity4▲ 18×11 topics
- Conservation3▲ 25×8 topics
- Conservation Biology3▲ 83×3 topics
- Invasive Species2▲ 20×9 topics
- Primates2▲ 378×1 topic
- Social Behavior2▲ 125×1 topic
- Molecular Phylogeny2▲ 38×3 topics
- Environmental Impact2▲ 3.3×2 topics
- Habitat Connectivity2▲ 300×1 topic
- Habitat Fragmentation2▲ 25×4 topics
- Road Ecology2▲ 300×1 topic
- Genetic Structure1▲ 66×3 topics
- Biogeography1▲ 16×2 topics
- Epidemiology1◆ 1.08×12 topics
- Globalization1▲ 2.3×3 topics
- Island Ecosystems1▲ 124×2 topics
- Mammal Evolution1▲ 195×1 topic
- Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis1▲ 195×1 topic
- Predator-Prey Interactions1▲ 52×2 topics
- Animal Welfare1▲ 42×1 topic
- Ecological Niche1▲ 65×1 topic
- Genetic Diversity1▲ 8.4×6 topics
- Mast Seeding1▲ 182×1 topic
- Remote Sensing1▲ 3.0×2 topics
- Rodent Eradication1▲ 182×1 topic
- Species Distribution Modeling1▲ 65×1 topic
- Stress Indicators1▲ 123×1 topic
- Education1▲ 1.99×2 topics
- Environmental Conservation1▲ 34×1 topic
- Global Change1▲ 13×3 topics
- Hydrographic Basins1▲ 162×1 topic
Which research topics does Instituto Pró-Carnívoros publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Primate Behavior and Ecology, Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation and Evolution and Paleontology Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 6 works
- 2 Primate Behavior and Ecology Social Psychology 2 works
- 3 Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation Ecology 2 works
- 4 Evolution and Paleontology Studies Paleontology 1 works
- 5 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 1 works
- 6 Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies Ecology 1 works
- 7 Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies Small Animals 1 works
- 8 Geography and Environmental Studies Water Science and Technology 1 works
- 9 Human-Animal Interaction Studies Genetics 1 works
- 10 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Instituto Pró-Carnívoros's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 7% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Instituto Pró-Carnívoros as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000079% in 2024.
Fractional works of Instituto Pró-Carnívoros over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Atibaia
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Instituto Pró-Carnívoros. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.