Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

KeraNetics (United States)

Research works
9
▲ 52% vs 2018-21
Citations
307
32.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
31.7%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
39%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: KeraNetics (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does KeraNetics (United States) work in?

In all years, 59% of research at KeraNetics (United States) is in Health Sciences, 28% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (59%), Engineering (17%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (7%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 6 fractional works · 59.2% of its workMedicine: 6 fractional works · 59.2% of its workDermatology: 2 fractional works · 16.2% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 9.4% of its workRehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 8.6% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 7.3% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 3.8% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 3.4% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 27.7% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 16.8% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 11.5% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workBiomaterials: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 5.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 5.3% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 13.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 7.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 6.1% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workALL ITS WORKKeraNetics(United States)9fractional works, all years
Life Sciences13%Physical Sciences28%Health Sciences59%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 6 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine659.2%
    1. Engineering216.8%
    2. Materials Science15.5%
    3. Computer Science05.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology17.0%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences16.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at KeraNetics (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Luke Burnett and Seth Tomblyn lead among researchers whose main affiliation is KeraNetics (United States).

  1. 1 Luke Burnett United States · #880,475 worldwide 1.4k citations · 34 works
  2. 2 Seth Tomblyn United States · #1,589,459 worldwide 804 citations · 24 works
All ranked researchers at KeraNetics (United States)

What are the most cited papers from KeraNetics (United States)?

The most cited paper from KeraNetics (United States) is "Development and Characterization of a 3D Printed, Keratin-Based Hydrogel" (Jesse K. Placone, Javier Navarro, Gregory W. Laslo et al., 2016), with 126 citations. Next come "Hemostatic properties and the role of cell receptor recognition in human hair keratin protein hydrogels" (126) and "Tunable Keratin Hydrogels for Controlled Erosion and Growth Factor Delivery" (112).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Development and Characterization of a 3D Printed, Keratin-Based Hydrogel Jesse K. Placone, Javier Navarro, Gregory W. Laslo et al. · Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29 Apr 2016 126
2 Hemostatic properties and the role of cell receptor recognition in human hair keratin protein hydrogels Luke Burnett, Mária B. Rahmany, Jillian R. Richter et al. · Biomaterials 20 Jan 2013 126
3 Tunable Keratin Hydrogels for Controlled Erosion and Growth Factor Delivery Trevor R. Ham, Ryan T. Lee, Sangheon Han et al. · Biomacromolecules Open access 4 Dec 2015 112
4 Keratin Hydrogel Enhances In Vivo Skeletal Muscle Function in a Rat Model of Volumetric Muscle Loss Juliana A. Passipieri, Hannah B. Baker, Mevan L. Siriwardane et al. · Tissue Engineering Part A Open access 7 Feb 2017 99
5 Keratin hydrogel carrier system for simultaneous delivery of exogenous growth factors and muscle progenitor cells Seth Tomblyn, Elizabeth L. Pettit Kneller, Stephen J. Walker et al. · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials Open access 7 May 2015 77
All 26 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does KeraNetics (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity, Effects of Radiation Exposure, Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies and Dermatologic Treatments and Research.

  1. 1 Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity Dermatology 0 works
  2. 2 Effects of Radiation Exposure Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
  3. 3 Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies Epidemiology 0 works
  4. 4 Dermatologic Treatments and Research Dermatology 0 works
  5. 5 Silk-based biomaterials and applications Biomaterials 0 works
  6. 6 Cancer and Skin Lesions Dermatology 0 works
  7. 7 Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers Building and Construction 0 works
  8. 8 Burn Injury Management and Outcomes Epidemiology 0 works
  9. 9 Wound Healing and Treatments Rehabilitation 0 works
  10. 10 Tendon Structure and Treatment Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available38.9%not open61.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors8.9%domestic only91.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has KeraNetics (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 52% higher than in 2018-2021.

2005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is KeraNetics (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000014% in 2023.

0.000020%0.000040%0.000060%KeraNetics (United States)0.000015% in 202420102020

Fractional works of KeraNetics (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Winston-Salem

All research institutions in Winston-Salem

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about KeraNetics (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.