Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Company · York · United Kingdom

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)

In research, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) stands highest in Health Sciences (#4,679 of 11,982 worldwide), Medicine (#6,611 of 10,443 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#8,141 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in General Health Professions — General Health Professions is 4.5× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#12,417
of 28,054 · #9,219 all time
Rank in United Kingdom
#454
of 1,094
Research works
2.3k
▲ 101% vs 2013–17
Citations
39k
16.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.3%
record average 16.5%
Open access
31%
world 28%

What is Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Health SciencesDomain #4,679 of 11,982 8.2%193 #3293
MedicineField #6,611 of 10,443 7.8%154 #3764
Social SciencesDomain #8,141 of 10,521 9.3%144 #3748
Life SciencesDomain #6,529 of 7,800 5.3%65 #8973
Social SciencesField #5,615 of 6,365 11.1%67 #2991

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Health Sciences#3,293 #4,679
  2. Medicine#3,764 #6,611
  3. Social Sciences#3,748 #8,141
  4. Life Sciences#8,973 #6,529
  5. Social Sciences#2,991 #5,615
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

What does Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: General Health Professions takes 4.5× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. General Health ProfessionsSubfield · 27.0 works4.5×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.27× its world share, 6 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.40× its world share, 33 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.21× its world share, 10 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 2.18× its world share, 16 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.87× its world share, 1 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.28× its world share, 10 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.13× its world share, 8 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.39× its world share, 8 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.07× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.72× its world share, 4 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.22× its world share, 2 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.66× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 2.96× its world share, 34 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.83× its world share, 154 worksMedicineNursing: 1.66× its world share, 4 worksNursingVeterinary: 0.34× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 1.01× its world share, 13 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.60× its world share, 8 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.94× its world share, 12 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.84× its world share, 8 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.70× its world share, 36 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.20× its world share, 67 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 3.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)?

Ranked on the composite score, Marie Westwood, Robert Wolff and Kate Misso lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom).

  1. 1 Marie Westwood United Kingdom · #291,515 worldwide 121 citations · 21 works
  2. 2 Robert Wolff United Kingdom · #325,288 worldwide 169 citations · 15 works
  3. 3 Kate Misso United Kingdom · #375,279 worldwide 87 citations · 17 works
  4. 4 Nigel Armstrong United Kingdom · #431,373 worldwide 106 citations · 43 works
  5. 5 Dan Boghen United Kingdom · #436,147 worldwide 59 citations · 17 works
  6. 6 Steve Ryder United Kingdom · #439,182 worldwide 94 citations · 15 works
  7. 7 Steve Ruddock United Kingdom · #521,183 worldwide 0 citations · 58 works
  8. 8 Steven J. Zweig United Kingdom · #892,422 worldwide 33 citations · 60 works
  9. 9 Steven Duffy United Kingdom · #1,056,749 worldwide 36 citations · 15 works
  10. 10 Gemma Alderton United Kingdom · #1,219,026 worldwide 22 citations · 182 works
All ranked researchers at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)

Which keywords describe research at Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Medical Education, Epidemiology, Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing Education, Knowledge Management, Organizational Culture, Barriers and Facilitators and Healthcare Professionals.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology33▲ 1.93×92 topics
  2. Inflammation19▲ 2.1×57 topics
  3. Medical Education17▲ 15×9 topics
  4. Evidence-Based Practice16▲ 28×6 topics
  5. Knowledge Management15▲ 6.3×6 topics
  6. Nursing Education15▲ 25×4 topics
  7. Organizational Culture14▲ 8.1×4 topics
  8. Quality of Life14▲ 2.1×41 topics
  9. Barriers and Facilitators13▲ 166×1 topic
  10. Healthcare Professionals13▲ 166×1 topic
  11. Public Health13▲ 2.0×35 topics
  12. Globalization12▲ 1.45×31 topics
  13. Mental Health12▲ 1.92×25 topics
  14. Education12▲ 1.60×25 topics
  15. Risk Factors12▲ 2.4×27 topics
  16. Cardiovascular Disease11▲ 2.4×30 topics
  17. Treatment11▲ 2.1×34 topics
  18. Depression10▲ 2.5×17 topics
  19. Metabolic Syndrome9▲ 2.6×22 topics
  20. Social Media9▲ 1.38×14 topics
  21. Cancer8▲ 1.43×28 topics
  22. Meta-Analysis8▲ 3.2×12 topics
  23. Global Burden8▲ 3.4×10 topics
  24. Adolescents8▲ 4.7×9 topics
  25. Gender7▲ 3.1×11 topics
  26. Prevalence7▲ 3.8×9 topics
  27. Genetics7▲ 2.2×16 topics
  28. Clinical Trials6▲ 2.2×15 topics
  29. Emotion Regulation6▲ 4.7×8 topics
  30. Feminism6▲ 5.0×7 topics
  31. Heart Failure6▲ 3.2×10 topics
  32. Religion6▲ 2.9×14 topics
  33. Clinical Guidelines6▲ 4.6×9 topics
  34. Hypertension5▲ 4.2×12 topics
  35. Chronic Kidney Disease5▲ 4.4×8 topics
  36. Global South4▲ 15×2 topics
  37. Stereotypes4▲ 9.5×2 topics
  38. Activism4▲ 21×2 topics
  39. Cold War4▲ 13×1 topic
  40. Transnational4▲ 32×1 topic

Which research topics does Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Health Sciences Research and Education, Historical Gender and Feminism Studies, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews and Misinformation and Its Impacts.

  1. 1 Health Sciences Research and Education General Health Professions 13 works
  2. 2 Historical Gender and Feminism Studies Sociology and Political Science 4 works
  3. 3 Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 3 works
  4. 4 Misinformation and Its Impacts Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  5. 5 Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics Clinical Psychology 2 works
  6. 6 Mental Health Treatment and Access Social Psychology 2 works
  7. 7 scientometrics and bibliometrics research Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2 works
  8. 8 Gender Diversity and Inequality Gender Studies 2 works
  9. 9 Climate Change Communication and Perception Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  10. 10 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available31.3%not open68.7%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors42.4%domestic only57.6%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 101% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in York

All research institutions in York

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.