Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Kostroma · Russia

Kologrivsky Nature Reserve

Research works
11
▲ 398% vs 2018-21
Citations
152
14.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
49%
world 40%
International
36%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Kologrivsky Nature Reserve is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Kologrivsky Nature Reserve work in?

In all years, 48% of research at Kologrivsky Nature Reserve is in Physical Sciences, 47% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (34%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (30%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (16%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 48.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 4 fractional works · 33.7% of its workEcology: 3 fractional works · 27.3% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 11.0% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workGeometry and Topology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workFuel Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLife Sciences: 5 fractional works · 47.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 29.8% of its workGenetics: 3 fractional works · 26.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 16.0% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 4.0% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 4.2% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workALL ITS WORKKologrivskyNature Reserve11fractional works, all years
Life Sciences47%Physical Sciences48%Health Sciences4%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 10 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science433.7%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences111.0%
    3. Engineering01.7%
    4. Mathematics01.6%
    5. Energy00.5%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology329.8%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences216.0%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology01.5%
    1. Health Professions03.1%
    2. Medicine01.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.88× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2.20× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Earth and Planetary Sciences: 16.00× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 2.60× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 7.91× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 7.11× its world share, 0 worksMathematics1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 16.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Earth and Planetary Sciences16.00×0 works
  2. Environmental Science7.91×1 works
  3. Mathematics7.11×0 works
  4. Energy2.60×0 works
  5. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.20×0 works
  6. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.88×0 works
  7. Engineering0.60×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Kologrivsky Nature Reserve?

Ranked on the quality score, Inna Voloshina lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Kologrivsky Nature Reserve.

  1. 1 Inna Voloshina Russia · #2,762,442 worldwide 682 citations · 50 works
All ranked researchers at Kologrivsky Nature Reserve

What are the most cited papers from Kologrivsky Nature Reserve?

The most cited paper from Kologrivsky Nature Reserve is "Genetic Status of Asiatic Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus) Reintroduced into South Korea Based on Mitochondrial DNA and Microsatellite Loci Analysis" (Yung-Kun Kim, Yoon‐Jee Hong, Mi‐Sook Min et al., 2011), with 67 citations. Next come "Using Scent‐Matching Dogs to Identify Individual Amur Tigers from Scats" (61) and "Genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from East Asia based on microsatellite loci analyses" (60).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Genetic Status of Asiatic Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus) Reintroduced into South Korea Based on Mitochondrial DNA and Microsatellite Loci Analysis Yung-Kun Kim, Yoon‐Jee Hong, Mi‐Sook Min et al. · Journal of Heredity 2011 67
2 Using Scent‐Matching Dogs to Identify Individual Amur Tigers from Scats Linda L. Kerley, Galina P. Salkina · Journal of Wildlife Management Jun 2007 61
3 Genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from East Asia based on microsatellite loci analyses Sung Kyoung Choi, Jieun Lee, Young Jun Kim et al. · BMC Genetics Open access 17 Jul 2014 60
4 Asia-wide phylogeography of wild boar (Sus scrofa) based on mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome: Revising the migration routes of wild boar in Asia Sung Kyoung Choi, Kyung Seok Kim, Maryana N. Ranyuk et al. · PLoS ONE Open access 24 Aug 2020 45
5 Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Sequence Variations and Population Structure of Siberian Chipmunk (Tamias sibiricus) in Northeastern Asia and Population Substructure in South Korea Mu‐Yeong Lee, A.A. Lissovsky, Sun-Kyung Park et al. · Molecules and Cells Open access Dec 2008 40
All 33 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Kologrivsky Nature Reserve publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Ecology and biodiversity studies, Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research, Marine and environmental studies and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies.

  1. 1 Ecology and biodiversity studies Ecology 0 works
  2. 2 Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research Genetics 0 works
  3. 3 Marine and environmental studies Oceanography 0 works
  4. 4 Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies Ecology 0 works
  5. 5 Geological Studies and Exploration Geology 0 works
  6. 6 Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  7. 7 Morphological variations and asymmetry Geometry and Topology 0 works
  8. 8 Aquatic and Environmental Studies Earth-Surface Processes 0 works
  9. 9 Tree Root and Stability Studies Mechanical Engineering 0 works
  10. 10 Soil and Environmental Studies Soil Science 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available49.4%not open50.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors35.5%domestic only64.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Kologrivsky Nature Reserve's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 398% higher than in 2018-2021.

201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Kologrivsky Nature Reserve as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000012% in 2023.

0.000025%0.000050%0.000075%Kologrivsky Nature Reserve0.000023% in 202420102020

Fractional works of Kologrivsky Nature Reserve over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Kostroma

All research institutions in Kostroma

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Kologrivsky Nature Reserve. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.