Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive
In research, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,159 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Psychology — Psychology is 8.3× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #18,525 of 28,054 · #25,549 all time
- Rank in France
- #852 of 1,422
- Research works
- 680 ▲ 37% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 11k 16.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 21% world 28%
What is Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #7,159 of 10,521 | 13.0% | 97 | #6980 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Psychology takes 8.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- PsychologyField · 37.5 works8.3×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 8.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 8.3×
- Neuroscience 4.5×
- Health Professions 3.2×
- Veterinary 3.2×
- Social Sciences 2.5×
- Arts and Humanities 1.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.1×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Nursing 0.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive?
Ranked on the composite score, Paula M. Niedenthal, Michel Fayol and Françoise Bernard lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive.
- 1 Paula M. Niedenthal France · #62,676 worldwide 449 citations · 48 works
- 2 Michel Fayol France · #119,550 worldwide 202 citations · 65 works
- 3 Françoise Bernard France · #231,975 worldwide 22 citations · 48 works
- 4 Michel Streith France · #283,613 worldwide 3 citations · 31 works
- 5 Martial Mermillod France · #322,660 worldwide 110 citations · 45 works
- 6 Patrick Bonin France · #330,348 worldwide 168 citations · 45 works
- 7 Jean‐Claude Croizet France · #497,585 worldwide 196 citations · 16 works
- 8 Armelle Nugier France · #499,474 worldwide 32 citations · 36 works
- 9 Pascal Huguet France · #520,231 worldwide 128 citations · 54 works
- 10 Alain Méot France · #530,785 worldwide 79 citations · 28 works
Which keywords describe research at Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Social Justice, Gender Studies, Resilience, Professional Practices, Public Action, Community Engagement and Public Policy.
- Sociolinguistics
- Neuroscience
- End-of-Life Care
- Self-Regulation
- Implicit Bias
- Social Identity
- Developmental Trauma
- Childhood Trauma
- Group Therapy
- Neural Correlates
- Palliative Care
- Attachment
- Neural Mechanisms
- Citizen Participation
- Sustainable Development
- Public Policy
- Globalization
- Public Action
- Resilience
- Social Justice
- Mental Health
- Gender Studies
- Professional Practices
- Community Engagement
- Local Development
- Territorial Governance
- Well-being
- Environmental Participation
- Social Determinants of Health
- Emotion Regulation
- Social Interaction
- Clinical Practice
- Social Cognition
- Language Development
- Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
- Environmental Attitudes
- Intergroup Contact
- Stereotype Threat
- Emotion
- Healthcare Quality Indicators
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mental Health16▲ 7.3×26 topics
- Social Justice8▲ 9.4×7 topics
- Gender Studies8▲ 33×2 topics
- Resilience7▲ 10×8 topics
- Professional Practices7▲ 123×1 topic
- Public Action7▲ 123×1 topic
- Community Engagement7▲ 14×4 topics
- Globalization7▲ 2.3×14 topics
- Local Development7▲ 40×2 topics
- Public Policy7▲ 9.2×3 topics
- Territorial Governance7▲ 36×2 topics
- Sustainable Development6▲ 2.5×5 topics
- Well-being5▲ 9.1×11 topics
- Citizen Participation5▲ 27×1 topic
- Environmental Participation5▲ 43×1 topic
- Neural Mechanisms5▲ 36×4 topics
- Social Determinants of Health5▲ 15×3 topics
- Attachment5▲ 36×4 topics
- Emotion Regulation4▲ 9.8×9 topics
- Palliative Care4▲ 17×3 topics
- Social Interaction4▲ 6.7×7 topics
- Neural Correlates4▲ 28×5 topics
- Clinical Practice4▲ 17×3 topics
- Group Therapy4▲ 69×2 topics
- Social Cognition4▲ 15×6 topics
- Childhood Trauma4▲ 40×2 topics
- Language Development4▲ 21×5 topics
- Developmental Trauma4▲ 101×1 topic
- Psychodynamic Psychotherapy4▲ 101×1 topic
- Social Identity4▲ 26×4 topics
- Environmental Attitudes3▲ 30×2 topics
- Implicit Bias3▲ 50×2 topics
- Intergroup Contact3▲ 87×1 topic
- Self-Regulation3▲ 13×4 topics
- Stereotype Threat3▲ 87×1 topic
- End-of-Life Care3▲ 18×2 topics
- Emotion3▲ 10×6 topics
- Neuroscience3▲ 7.1×7 topics
- Healthcare Quality Indicators3▲ 33×2 topics
- Sociolinguistics3▲ 11×5 topics
Which research topics does Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education, sociology, and vocational training, French Urban and Social Studies, Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research and Social and Intergroup Psychology.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, sociology, and vocational training Sociology and Political Science 7 works
- 2 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 5 works
- 3 Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research Clinical Psychology 4 works
- 4 Social and Intergroup Psychology Sociology and Political Science 3 works
- 5 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 3 works
- 6 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 3 works
- 7 Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Social Psychology 2 works
- 8 Agriculture and Rural Development Research Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2 works
- 9 Environmental Education and Sustainability Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
- 10 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 37% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Clermont-Ferrand
- Université Clermont Auvergne
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
- Unité de Nutrition Humaine
- Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d'Auvergne
- Centre Jean Perrin
- Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans
- Sigma Clermont
- France Business School
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.