Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Stockholm · Sweden

Marie Cederschiöld University

In research, Marie Cederschiöld University stands highest in Social Sciences (#4,736 of 9,585 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#3,075 of 5,988 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Health Professions (Health Professions is 5.2× its share of world research).

World rank, 2022-now
#11,824
of 22,385 · #9,877 all time
Rank in Sweden
#66
of 107
Research works
570
▲ 13% vs 2018-21
Citations
11k
19.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
11.6%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.04×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
48%
world 40%
International
17%
world 18%

What is Marie Cederschiöld University known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #4,736 of 9,585 13.7%93 #4482
Social SciencesField #3,075 of 5,988 13.3%67 #3935

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Marie Cederschiöld University sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Marie Cederschiöld University work in?

In 2022-now, 60% of research at Marie Cederschiöld University is in Social Sciences, 35% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (43%), Medicine (21%), Health Professions (14%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 104 fractional works · 60.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 73 fractional works · 42.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 31 fractional works · 17.8% of its workEducation: 15 fractional works · 8.7% of its workPublic Administration: 6 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 6 fractional works · 3.4% of its workHealth: 5 fractional works · 2.8% of its workSafety Research: 3 fractional works · 1.8% of its workDemography: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGender Studies: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychology: 23 fractional works · 13.4% of its workClinical Psychology: 18 fractional works · 10.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 3 fractional works · 1.9% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 3 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPhilosophy: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 1.5% of its workFinance: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 1.0% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 60 fractional works · 34.9% of its workMedicine: 35 fractional works · 20.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 12 fractional works · 6.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 6 fractional works · 3.8% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 4 fractional works · 2.3% of its workOncology: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEpidemiology: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHealth Professions: 24 fractional works · 13.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 18 fractional works · 10.3% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 3 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOccupational Therapy: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPhysical Sciences: 6 fractional works · 3.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 4 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEcology: 3 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workALL ITS WORKMarieCederschiöld…172fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences3%Health Sciences35%Social Sciences60%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences7342.5%
    2. Psychology2313.4%
    3. Arts and Humanities31.8%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance31.5%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting21.0%
    6. Decision Sciences00.2%
    1. Medicine3520.5%
    2. Health Professions2413.8%
    3. Nursing10.3%
    4. Veterinary00.2%
    5. Dentistry00.0%
    1. Environmental Science42.1%
    2. Engineering20.9%
    3. Computer Science00.2%
    4. Mathematics00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences21.1%
    2. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.1%
    3. Neuroscience00.1%
    4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Marie Cederschiöld University specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Health Professions takes 5.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Health ProfessionsField · 23.8 works5.2×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.23× its world share, 2 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.37× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.06× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.43× its world share, 4 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsDentistry: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 5.25× its world share, 24 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.07× its world share, 35 worksMedicineNursing: 0.61× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 1.42× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.62× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.30× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.72× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.38× its world share, 23 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.36× its world share, 73 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 19 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions5.25×24 works
  2. Psychology4.38×23 works
  3. Social Sciences3.36×73 works
  4. Veterinary1.42×0 works
  5. Medicine1.07×35 works
  6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.72×3 works
  7. Arts and Humanities0.62×3 works
  8. Nursing0.61×0 works
  9. Environmental Science0.43×4 works
  10. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.37×0 works
  11. Business, Management and Accounting0.30×2 works
  12. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.23×2 works
  13. Decision Sciences0.20×0 works
  14. Mathematics0.16×0 works
  15. Dentistry0.10×0 works
  16. Engineering0.06×2 works
  17. Neuroscience0.04×0 works
  18. Computer Science0.02×0 works
  19. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.01×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Marie Cederschiöld University?

Ranked on the quality score, Victor A. Pestoff, Anna Klarare and Åsa Kneck lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Marie Cederschiöld University.

  1. 1 Victor A. Pestoff Sweden · #955,412 worldwide 4.1k citations · 125 works
  2. 2 Anna Klarare Sweden · #956,157 worldwide 1.4k citations · 65 works
  3. 3 Åsa Kneck Sweden · #1,212,446 worldwide 730 citations · 53 works
  4. 4 Åsa Landberg Sweden · #1,273,503 worldwide 232 citations · 23 works
  5. 5 Jane Österlind Sweden · #1,577,698 worldwide 1k citations · 54 works
  6. 6 Agneta Cronqvist Sweden · #1,848,946 worldwide 901 citations · 38 works
  7. 7 Johan Hvenmark Sweden · #2,154,669 worldwide 252 citations · 57 works
  8. 8 Anette Alvariza Sweden · #2,171,846 worldwide 1.7k citations · 125 works
  9. 9 Jennifer Bullington Sweden · #2,295,442 worldwide 861 citations · 51 works
  10. 10 Malin Lövgren Sweden · #2,299,463 worldwide 1.5k citations · 117 works
All ranked researchers at Marie Cederschiöld University

What are the most cited papers from Marie Cederschiöld University?

The most cited paper from Marie Cederschiöld University is "Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda" (Bram Verschuere, Taco Brandsen, Victor A. Pestoff, 2012), with 594 citations. Next come "Risk factors for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a case control study" (525) and "Combined analysis of risk factors for SUDEP" (504).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda Bram Verschuere, Taco Brandsen, Victor A. Pestoff · VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Open access 11 Sep 2012 594
2 Risk factors for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a case control study Lena Maria Nilsson, BY Farahmand, P Persson et al. · The Lancet Mar 1999 525
3 Combined analysis of risk factors for SUDEP Dale C. Hesdorffer, Torbjörn Tomson, Emma K. T. Benn et al. · Epilepsia 28 Jan 2011 504
4 Developing the Concept of Moral Sensitivity in Health Care Practice Kim Lützén, Vera Dahlqvist, Sture Eriksson et al. · Nursing Ethics 15 Feb 2006 356
5 Ethical and Methodological Issues in Interviewing Persons With Dementia Ingrid Hellström, Mike Nolan, Lennart Nordenfelt et al. · Nursing Ethics Sep 2007 353
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Marie Cederschiöld University?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, NGOs, Resilience, Ethical Considerations, Religion, Social Sciences, Social Support and Pedagogy.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Mental Health21▲ 8.5×25 topics
  2. Public Health10▲ 4.1×11 topics
  3. NGOs10▲ 63×3 topics
  4. Globalization10▲ 3.0×11 topics
  5. Quality of Life10▲ 3.9×22 topics
  6. Resilience9▲ 11×7 topics
  7. Ethical Considerations9▲ 15×8 topics
  8. Education9▲ 3.0×5 topics
  9. Qualitative Research9▲ 5.9×9 topics
  10. Religion8▲ 11×6 topics
  11. Social Sciences8▲ 33×3 topics
  12. Social Support8▲ 8.6×13 topics
  13. Pedagogy8▲ 9.1×3 topics
  14. Risk Factors7▲ 3.8×12 topics
  15. Job Satisfaction7▲ 8.8×8 topics
  16. Social Capital6▲ 7.3×4 topics
  17. Burnout6▲ 41×3 topics
  18. Adolescents6▲ 10.0×5 topics
  19. Development6▲ 10×3 topics
  20. Philanthropy6▲ 85×2 topics
  21. Secularism6▲ 35×4 topics
  22. Stress6▲ 9.7×4 topics
  23. Child Welfare6▲ 93×2 topics
  24. Mental Illness6▲ 48×3 topics
  25. Psychiatric Disorders6▲ 25×3 topics
  26. Community Development6▲ 18×4 topics
  27. Health-related Quality of Life6▲ 14×3 topics
  28. Well-being6▲ 8.4×8 topics
  29. Evidence-Based Practice6▲ 24×5 topics
  30. Nonprofit Sector5▲ 256×1 topic
  31. Prosocial Behavior5▲ 124×2 topics
  32. Volunteering5▲ 256×1 topic
  33. Psychological Impact5▲ 9.8×8 topics
  34. Discourse Analysis5▲ 12×1 topic
  35. End-of-Life5▲ 34×2 topics
  36. Learning5▲ 10×2 topics
  37. Methodology5▲ 62×1 topic
  38. Palliative Care5▲ 20×2 topics
  39. Cultural Competence5▲ 23×5 topics
  40. Civil Society5▲ 26×2 topics

Which research topics does Marie Cederschiöld University publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering, Social and Educational Sciences, Social Work Education and Practice and Religion, Society, and Development.

  1. 1 Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering Sociology and Political Science 5 works
  2. 2 Social and Educational Sciences Education 5 works
  3. 3 Social Work Education and Practice Public Administration 5 works
  4. 4 Religion, Society, and Development Sociology and Political Science 4 works
  5. 5 Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4 works
  6. 6 Homelessness and Social Issues General Health Professions 4 works
  7. 7 Child Abuse and Trauma Clinical Psychology 4 works
  8. 8 Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 4 works
  9. 9 Family Support in Illness Sociology and Political Science 3 works
  10. 10 Intimate Partner and Family Violence Health 3 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available48.3%not open51.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.6%domestic only83.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Marie Cederschiöld University's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 13% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Marie Cederschiöld University as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00058% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%Marie Cederschiöld University0.00083% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Marie Cederschiöld University over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

still counting10%20%Marie Cederschiöld University10.1% in 2025all institutions10.0% in 20252020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 16.1% in 2018.

Other research institutions in Stockholm

All research institutions in Stockholm

Share Marie Cederschiöld University's ranking

Marie Cederschiöld University on Science Explorer

A card with Marie Cederschiöld University's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Marie Cederschiöld University. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.