- Research works
- 62 ▼ 76% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 62 1.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 77% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Multnomah County Library is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which keywords describe research at Multnomah County Library?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Diversity, Library Services, Social Inclusion, Academic Libraries, Technology Integration, Educational Technology, User Engagement and Digital Textbooks.
- National Identity
- Empire
- Cultural Exchange
- Competitive Advantage
- Open Innovation
- Health Policy
- Culture
- Cultural Studies
- Organizational Culture
- Colonialism
- Leadership
- Public Health
- Information Behavior
- Globalization
- Digital Literacy
- Social Media
- Digital Textbooks
- Educational Technology
- Academic Libraries
- Library Services
- Diversity
- Social Inclusion
- Technology Integration
- User Engagement
- E-Books
- Web 2.0
- Education
- History
- Information Literacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Literature
- Identity
- Social Support
- Nursing Education
- Society
- Nursing Advocacy
- Change Management
- Cultural Diversity
- Educational Leadership
- Employee Engagement
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Diversity14▲ 128×2 topics
- Library Services14▲ 1349×1 topic
- Social Inclusion14▲ 623×1 topic
- Academic Libraries12▲ 413×3 topics
- Technology Integration6▲ 46×4 topics
- Educational Technology5▲ 13×3 topics
- User Engagement5▲ 188×2 topics
- Digital Textbooks4▲ 597×1 topic
- E-Books4▲ 597×1 topic
- Social Media4▲ 8.5×1 topic
- Web 2.04▲ 358×1 topic
- Digital Literacy4▲ 22×3 topics
- Education4▲ 4.3×6 topics
- Globalization3▲ 2.9×4 topics
- History3▲ 6.7×6 topics
- Information Behavior3▲ 338×1 topic
- Information Literacy3▲ 43×1 topic
- Public Health3▲ 3.4×3 topics
- Artificial Intelligence2▲ 4.6×3 topics
- Leadership2▲ 11×4 topics
- Literature2▲ 7.6×4 topics
- Colonialism2▲ 6.5×3 topics
- Identity2▲ 4.2×3 topics
- Organizational Culture2▲ 12×2 topics
- Social Support2▲ 7.0×2 topics
- Cultural Studies2▲ 7.9×2 topics
- Nursing Education2▲ 25×2 topics
- Culture2▲ 5.5×3 topics
- Society2▲ 12×3 topics
- Health Policy2▲ 16×1 topic
- Nursing Advocacy2▲ 132×1 topic
- Open Innovation2▲ 51×2 topics
- Change Management1▲ 70×3 topics
- Competitive Advantage1▲ 52×2 topics
- Cultural Diversity1▲ 11×1 topic
- Cultural Exchange1▲ 16×2 topics
- Educational Leadership1▲ 24×1 topic
- Empire1▲ 25×2 topics
- Employee Engagement1▲ 23×2 topics
- National Identity1▲ 18×2 topics
Which research topics does Multnomah County Library publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Privacy, Security, and Data Protection.
- 1 Privacy, Security, and Data Protection Sociology and Political Science 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
How has Multnomah County Library's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 76% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Portland
- Oregon Health & Science University
- Portland State University
- University of Portland
- Lewis & Clark College
- Reed College
- Portland VA Medical Center
- Pacific Northwest Research Station
- Oregon Medical Research Center
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.