Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

Nanocopoeia (United States)

Research works
10
▼ 62% vs 2018-21
Citations
151
15.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
13.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
20%
world 40%
International
8%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Nanocopoeia (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Nanocopoeia (United States) work in?

In all years, 49% of research at Nanocopoeia (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 28% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (27%), Engineering (19%), Environmental Science (16%).

Physical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 49.0% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 18.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 10.4% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 16.0% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 5.2% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 3.9% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 10.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 6.7% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 3.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBioengineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 28.1% of its workMedicine: 3 fractional works · 27.0% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 14.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 14.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 10.5% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 10.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 8.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workALL ITS WORKNanocopoeia(United States)10fractional works, all years
Life Sciences15%Physical Sciences49%Health Sciences28%Social Sciences8%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering218.7%
    2. Environmental Science216.0%
    3. Materials Science110.6%
    4. Computer Science01.4%
    5. Chemical Engineering01.2%
    6. Physics and Astronomy01.2%
    1. Medicine327.0%
    2. Health Professions01.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences110.5%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.6%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology01.8%
    1. Business, Management and Accounting03.5%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance03.5%
    3. Psychology01.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

What are the most cited papers from Nanocopoeia (United States)?

The most cited paper from Nanocopoeia (United States) is "Endothelial cell repopulation after stenting determines in-stent neointima formation: effects of bare-metal vs. drug-eluting stents and genetic endothelial cell modification" (Gillian Douglas, Erik-Jan Van Kampen, Ashley Hale et al., 2012), with 74 citations. Next come "Drug‐eluting stent coatings" (64) and "A Methodology for the Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Corn Fields Using High-Resolution RGB Imagery" (56).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Endothelial cell repopulation after stenting determines in-stent neointima formation: effects of bare-metal vs. drug-eluting stents and genetic endothelial cell modification Gillian Douglas, Erik-Jan Van Kampen, Ashley Hale et al. · European Heart Journal Open access 24 Sep 2012 74
2 Drug‐eluting stent coatings Judit Eva Puskas, Lyn G. Muñoz‐Robledo, Robert A. Hoerr et al. · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 28 Apr 2009 64
3 A Methodology for the Detection of Nitrogen Deficiency in Corn Fields Using High-Resolution RGB Imagery Dimitris Zermas, H. James Nelson, Panagiotis Stanitsas et al. · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 7 Oct 2020 56
4 Novel nanocomposite stent coating releasing resveratrol and quercetin reduces neointimal hyperplasia and promotes re-endothelialization James J. Kleinedler, John D. Foley, Elysse A. Orchard et al. · Journal of Controlled Release 17 Jan 2012 52
5 Synergistic effect of resveratrol and quercetin released from drug‐eluting polymer coatings for endovascular devices James J. Kleinedler, John D. Foley, Jonathan Steven Alexander et al. · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials 21 Sep 2011 33
All 19 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Nanocopoeia (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Smart Agriculture and AI, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Plant Disease Management Techniques and Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement.

  1. 1 Smart Agriculture and AI Plant Science 0 works
  2. 2 Remote Sensing in Agriculture Ecology 0 works
  3. 3 Plant Disease Management Techniques Plant Science 0 works
  4. 4 Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement Plant Science 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available19.7%not open80.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors8.2%domestic only91.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Nanocopoeia (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 62% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Nanocopoeia (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000064% in 2021.

0.000050%0.00010%Nanocopoeia (United States)0.0000093% in 202320102020

Fractional works of Nanocopoeia (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Saint Paul

All research institutions in Saint Paul

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Nanocopoeia (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.